Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
wherever crayons are sold.Pros: is nice to people who support him.
Cons: Is verbally and physically abusive to those who don't support him, doesn't understand foreign policy (thinks a totally nuclear Asia is OK) or conservative values (i.e. Said he thinks the federal government should run health care and education); believes women who get abortions should be punished...
Boy, where do I sign up with the other Trumpkins?
Qaz you are correct "sold"...if they were a Bernie or Billary supporter they would expect the government or Soros to give it them free.wherever crayons are sold.
No, they use pens. The good ones too. Gel-based.Qaz you are correct "sold"...if they were a Bernie or Billary supporter they would expect the government or Soros to give it them free.
Can they get them where they get their free Obama phones and government cheese?No, they use pens. The good ones too. Gel-based.
This is the problem with conservatives attempting humor, you only know how to punch down, not up. So your go to move is making fun of poor people.Can they get them where they get their free Obama phones and government cheese?
I did reference Clinton's emails in another thread, but you ignored posting in it, because I think even you have to admit now that the path this "inquiry" is taking doesn't look good for her in any way. She's a corrupt, lying POS, who will do and say almost anything to get elected. And BTW, she's taking money from places like Saudi Arabia, Russia, and Qatar for her campaign through the Clinton Foundation. Hmmm, what kind of influence peddling is going on there?This is the problem with conservatives attempting humor, you only know how to punch down, not up. So your go to move is making fun of poor people.
Which makes no sense when talking about Hillary Clinton. You could have referenced her email and said did she get it the same place she got her email server. Or you ref her issues with taking money from Wall Street and say did she get them free from Bear Stearns?
But all you know is poor people suck.
Didn't realize the government was giving out free pens, a trillion here a trillion there to a liberal it doesn't matter..No, they use pens. The good ones too. Gel-based.
lol at the idea that today is worse than the late 70s economically under almost any possible metric, except maybe the stagnation of real wages that has gone on more or less SINCE the late 70s (thanks Obama).I did reference Clinton's emails in another thread, but you ignored posting in it, because I think even you have to admit now that the path this "inquiry" is taking doesn't look good for her in any way. She's a corrupt, lying POS, who will do and say almost anything to get elected. And BTW, she's taking money from places like Saudi Arabia, Russia, and Qatar for her campaign through the Clinton Foundation. Hmmm, what kind of influence peddling is going on there?
I didn't say "poor people suck", you did. It's not the government's job to give people free Obama phones. This is a program in which there is rampant abuse and lots of fraudulent claims for the phones.
When I was growing up as a kid, my family was by no means or measure rich. My parents struggled to make ends meet. Instead of relying on government handouts to get by, they worked multiple, low paying jobs and eventually got back on their feet. My father worked in the Union of Operating Engineers as a heavy equipment operator, and there was a period where he had to collect unemployment. (He used it for it's intended purpose - to get back on his feet, which he eventually did.) The union wouldn't let him take non-union jobs when he was out-of-work. The Carter years sucked ass, and under Obama things have been even worse than they were under Carter for people who try to work in jobs like my parents had back then.
This is by all measures the most anemic "recovery" since the Great Depression. The reported unemployment rate is going down, but the jobs being created are mostly low-paying service jobs, many of which are part-time to boot, so employers can skirt the Obamacare rules. The real unemployment rate is significantly higher than the reported rate. Millions of people have quit looking for work completely and rely almost entirely on the government for their well-being now.lol at the idea that today is worse than the late 70s economically under almost any possible metric, except maybe the stagnation of real wages that has gone on more or less SINCE the late 70s (thanks Obama).
lol at railing against "abuses" in free phones or apparently government cheese when the real abuses in military procurement, tax avoidance by corporations, or crony capitalism so far outweigh any "abuses" in free phones that discussing the first is like complaining about a hangnail on a severed arm.
Bruce,Hey Qaz, do yourself a favor a take a break from posting. I think you need to get some help. Your candidate lost in spite of huge Main Street media bias, a DNC that torpedoed Sanders, and a full court press by the President and First Lady. HRC and the Dems lost mainly because they completely lost touch with working class White American citizens. It's just that simple. At this point history will write Pres. Obama's legacy.
Remember all the pre vote rehetoric about whether or not Trump would accept the results if he lost? Well, no one ever asked HRC..... or you.
Bruce,
No need to gloat.
"Main Street media bias"Hey Qaz, do yourself a favor a take a break from posting. I think you need to get some help. Your candidate lost in spite of huge Main Street media bias, a DNC that torpedoed Sanders, and a full court press by the President and First Lady. HRC and the Dems lost mainly because they completely lost touch with working class White American citizens. It's just that simple. At this point history will write Pres. Obama's legacy.
Remember all the pre vote rehetoric about whether or not Trump would accept the results if he lost? Well, no one ever asked HRC..... or you.
I did reference Clinton's emails in another thread, but you ignored posting in it, because I think even you have to admit now that the path this "inquiry" is taking doesn't look good for her in any way. She's a corrupt, lying POS, who will do and say almost anything to get elected. And BTW, she's taking money from places like Saudi Arabia, Russia, and Qatar for her campaign through the Clinton Foundation. Hmmm, what kind of influence peddling is going on there?
I didn't say "poor people suck", you did. It's not the government's job to give people free Obama phones. This is a program in which there is rampant abuse and lots of fraudulent claims for the phones.
When I was growing up as a kid, my family was by no means or measure rich. My parents struggled to make ends meet. Instead of relying on government handouts to get by, they worked multiple, low paying jobs and eventually got back on their feet. My father worked in the Union of Operating Engineers as a heavy equipment operator, and there was a period where he had to collect unemployment. (He used it for it's intended purpose - to get back on his feet, which he eventually did.) The union wouldn't let him take non-union jobs when he was out-of-work. The Carter years sucked ass, and under Obama things have been even worse than they were under Carter for people who try to work in jobs like my parents had back then.