We will certainly find out. Taylor, prior to his injury in hs, was a fairly well regarded player.Originally posted by *4purdue*:
That just like when everyone compared Tacos to Zeller. No comparison. CS would have been the star on this team, Taylor probably won't play. I just don't see minutes for him.
Deuce....one simple question....How is it a "Blow" to the program? Every coach, including Cal and K and Bo has misses. When they do, is that a blow to their program or do they move on?Originally posted by boiler-deuce:
Sorry, not landing Swanigan is a blow. No matter how hard we try to spin it into something it's not.....we all wanted the kid. It's not about MSU cheating, it's not about some player we have is better...it's a hit to the program. Trust me, it's ok to admit it hurts. Just face it.....we have to move on, but this one stings a bit as I really thought we had a shot. Turns out maybe we didn't.
I don't always agree with everything you post, but I agree with 95% of this one, all but the last sentence. Why anyone would believe Purdue didn't have a shot is beyond me. I think people too often forget a kid can only pick one school, it's not like he can divide his time. Does 2nd place suck? Yeah, of course. But that doesn't mean the kid's list of finalist schools/teams were junk and/or didn't have a chance of getting him. They were finalists for a reason, but in the end, a kid must narrow down his choice to only 1, and there are arguably dozens of factors that contribute to that. So I agree it was a tough blow for Purdue to come so close, but to say there was never a shot is such a defeatist way of looking at it.Originally posted by boiler-deuce:
Sorry, not landing Swanigan is a blow. No matter how hard we try to spin it into something it's not.....we all wanted the kid. It's not about MSU cheating, it's not about some player we have is better...it's a hit to the program. Trust me, it's ok to admit it hurts. Just face it.....we have to move on, but this one stings a bit as I really thought we had a shot. Turns out maybe we didn't.
So Swanigan was scared off by Taylor? What are you talking about?Originally posted by PU52Chevy:
hmmmm I disagree......Taylor is going to shock us all not in the know next year.....
Saw him work out in person....gazelle with hops and muscle and competitive.....kids a winner.
He is better than CS and that is why CS took the M$U spot taking Dawson's spot.
Believe in what we have at Purdue because next few years will be very special.
The reason it's a blow moreso to us than the other coaches is they land other Blue Chippers, we don't. He was the only big player we've had a legit shot at in a while. Those other programs land other Blue Chip....not just once a decade. I wanted this kid. Not just for getting him but hoping to build momentum. Every time we swing and miss it's another chance Painter lost to show everyone what he can do with a top prospect. You can't spin this into anything but a blow. Sorry, I stand by my thoughts.Ok, I'll try to answer two comments here:
Originally posted by TwinDegrees2:
Deuce....one simple question....How is it a "Blow" to the program? Every coach, including Cal and K and Bo has misses. When they do, is that a blow to their program or do they move on?Originally posted by boiler-deuce:
Sorry, not landing Swanigan is a blow. No matter how hard we try to spin it into something it's not.....we all wanted the kid. It's not about MSU cheating, it's not about some player we have is better...it's a hit to the program. Trust me, it's ok to admit it hurts. Just face it.....we have to move on, but this one stings a bit as I really thought we had a shot. Turns out maybe we didn't.
Personally, I don't think missing Swanigan is any more devastating than any other coach missing on any other player.
Remember, two days ago, Zo was landing the class of the century, and by missing Swanigan himself, he'll be out of a job in a year.
Caleb has "HANDLERS" who are pushing him where THEY want him to go. I'm glad Painter doesn't have to deal with that kind of situation.
Yeh, wft? Simpson was contributing and improving when he went down - leave him out of this.Originally posted by Poprudy:
Don't throw Simpsons name out there.
Originally posted by PU52Chevy:
hmmmm I disagree......Taylor is going to shock us all not in the know next year.....
Saw him work out in person....gazelle with hops and muscle and competitive.....kids a winner.
He is better than CS and that is why CS took the M$U spot taking Dawson's spot.
Believe in what we have at Purdue because next few years will be very special.
First you declare he isn't as good,now you're asking how good he is. You have likely not seen either one of them play.Originally posted by seminolesboilers:
okay...he is athletic. how is his basketball skills?