52 years ago for me a new ice age was coming...that was the scientist dominant thought at the time. I thought I read somewhere a couple of years ago that some Russian scientists still believe in an ice age. Whatever the belief of some we know a lot of money flows as a result that benefits some greatly and has some political power as well. Everyone has an island of knowledge and some islands are bigger than others, but ALL are dwarfed by the sea (of ignorance)
that's the problem with the low information voter, which most democrats are: They believe what a celebrity tells them when that celebrity knows nothing more that dribbling a ball or shaking their ass on stage.
Crazy America-hating Dementia Donald really poking the bear.
Does Taylor Swift's tour allow her to make an appearance at the Dem Convention? Trump may be too dementia-ridden to understand, but he's trolling her into doing so.
The Dems are gonna get Michelle O there, and here's the prediction: Steph Curry, maybe Beyonce, and now maybe Taylor Swift.
Y'all may think that celebrity endorsements aren't relevant. While they don't affect policy, they affect elections, both for better and for worse. A Taylor Swift/Steph Curry combo beats the hell out of Scott Baio.
.
unfortunately we are living in an age where understanding science is becoming more important for the collective dummies and many have no idea of anything to do with science, but they do understand playing with a ball or shaking an a$$ as you stated. You see, they haven't assimilated as an intelligent voter and the USA has not created enough importance for them to do so...and some want more dependency on the government "because" as we know through history ...the government is here to help you and knows "more than you" in what you need and how your money should be spent. Still facts are not important, but hope and JOY are as we have noticed by the side of the aisle that has censored freedom of speech and continues to do so and by that same side that also wants to censor guns which protects ALL other rights and the need to do so hiding the largest massacre in the USA (Meadows), but all over the world over many centuries consequences.
Yeah, it's a terrible argument, and I'd have thought folks who are ostensibly Purdue grads would have more respect for science in general and NASA in particular. You're basically saying "Cause A has had Effect B in the past. Now they're telling us that Cause C can have Effect B, but in the past, it was Cause A, so clearly it can't be Cause C." Sorry, but that logic doesn't logic.
Actually your causes could be different, but more in sign. If you have a curvilinear relationship rather than a linear relationship, then obviously your window of data is very important to capture the curve. If you included enough data to know it was curvilinear and depending on how symmetrical it was the variable measured and in question "might" have the same effect at equal but opposite signage (going up and coming down). However, the interaction at various settings with other variables might alter the answer more than the variable in interest. Hydrogen is a gas...oxygen is a gas, but the interaction at h2o is water. Although main variables may have different effects at different conditions and the interactions as well, main variables that are significant typically remain significant even if the value of it at different settings may be different. All kinds of potential problems can exist when speculating outside the window of data.
OMG, the effect is climate change.
It's easy to understand, but the fact the climate can change naturally does not disprove the notion that it can also be changed artificially. That's why it's a crappy argument. Evolution happens naturally, too, and has happened for billions of years absent humans. Do you think we can't change that either?
Biden and Harris along with Pelosi and Schumer all wanted a free and open boarder. To them, locking up the migrant vote was/is far more important than a few murders by those who crossed illegally.
Here's a question....if we go all electric, stop cows from farting in the USA, is that going to stop global warming or are other countries such as China, India, Pakistan, and many other countries continued use of fossil fuels and bad practices going to negate what we do and only make our lives more miserable? BTW....climate is and always has been cyclical.
So dumb. If other countries aren't going to help, then it becomes that much more important that the countries who are willing to do something actually follow through. If we accept the premise that fewer CO2 emissions is better (I acknowledge you probably don't accept this, but you'd have to for your argument to be of any use), then the US reducing emissions while China increases is still better than the US AND China both increasing. It's not as good as the US and China both decreasing, but we can only control ourselves and do our best to influence others. We've all done group projects where one or more group members don't do the work. The project still has to get done if you, the one actually doing the work, wants to get a decent grade.
FFS. The entirety of the scientific community that accepts that man-made climate change is real already knows this and, yet, they still say there's a separate issue. Or do you think that you should point out to the scientists that they missed something? That they just plum forgot to account for the natural cycles? Come back when you have your Nobel in hand.
Think for a minute, man is going to cause historic flooding, out of control wild fires, man made deserts, hurricanes and volcanic eruptions.
imprimis.hillsdale.edu
Do you believe, as many scientists do, that the cause of the dinosaurs becoming extinct was a massive change in the climate, specifically, an increase in temperatures?
Do you ride a bike to work?
These are different things. But, for the record, I'm pretty sure climate change doesn't affect volcanoes. But we've already caused more wildfires and more severe hurricanes. So, this doesn't really hold up. As for creating rain, you're conflating changes to the overall climatic conditions that have knock-on effects to us trying to create rain in a specific place at a specific time. You've basically created a strawman here.
Ok, cool.
Hillsdale lolGlobal Warming: Man-Made or Natural?
I believe that sound science and good sense will prevail in the face of irrational and scientifically baseless climate fears.
science.nasa.gov
All irrelevant.
Global Warming: Man-Made or Natural?
I believe that sound science and good sense will prevail in the face of irrational and scientifically baseless climate fears.
What are you doing to the rear ends of cows to make you wish that?
Most of what you don't like about Trump are related to his personality.
None. I'm already married.
None. I have my own kids.
None. Not my job. It's a culture thing.....
Maybe a few.
Not sure. Didn't ask.
"Rules for thee, not for me?"
Bingo. His personality is narcissistic, anti-rule of law, really old, unserious, anti-democracy, and erratic.
I care about more than just myself.
How is this relevant to whether or not climate change is real? I get that you can't actually support the notion that it's not with any kind of good evidence, so you're left to change the subject, but this line of attack doesn't gain you anything in the argument.
So it sounds like you obviously don't actually care about these issues, since you've not taken much action to help.
What? I proposed no rules to apply to anyone in that post.
Aggressive tariffs on China steel created a trade war.
Now that I am done laughing, can you try to explain what you think urban radio meant by these items you think you heard?
You obviously don't work in corporate America.
Ok, then give me an example of how climate change has impacted someone you know?
I care about this issues in the sense that I can point to something someone is doing wrong and tell them to correct it. I'm not going to correct it for them. That's were things like personal responsibility come it. You know, the old saying about leading a horse to water.....
What argument are you referring to? Is it the one about doing something personally to solve a societal problem?
Expecting others to solve a problem while you stand around and watch.
This is debatable from an economic impact perspective. The intention was to bring back more steel manufacturing jobs and prevent China from dumping steel on the US and deflating prices.
That's pretty vague. Do you mean when he fast tracked the vaccine? I thought libs like yourseld were in favor of vaccine mandates?
You love this dem lefty lib talking point but you only parrot it, you don't understand what it means.
it was in process until dems stopped it. Funny thing is, Biden is rebuilding a wall. Weird how that turned out.
