Is this what is playing out at Purdue? Summarizing, the principle says as you move up the ladder in your profession you advance as you successfully show your ability at each level. You continue to advance until you reach your level of incompetence. Then you remain at a level of incompetence unless you get fired or are demoted back to a level you can handle. Do we have coaches who have reached their level of incompetence and need to regress back to a level they can handle? I like this ”Principle”. Over the years I have observed it playing out many times in Engineering and Architectural offices as well as in industry. It doesn’t work in government jobs because once you are in it’s almost impossible to get fired and many times you can be incompetent and still advance. It also doesn’t work for elected officials as their advancement often is based on their ability to campaign (i.e. market themselves) and raise money rather than actual job performance. And we end up with the what we have in Washington and many states.
Sorry to get off on a tangent but back to the original question. Do we have coaches who have reached their level of incompetence?
Sorry to get off on a tangent but back to the original question. Do we have coaches who have reached their level of incompetence?