You think because you have a tricky new username to fool all of us, I am suddenly concerned about your position?
I don't think it's Scott at all. I'll go all in on one of Desantis or Haley, with a long shot being to GOP congresswoman from NY.
Well Trump said not Haley the other day. Desantis, good choice. Doubt he makes it though.
I mean, you've asked me what my position is multiple times in this thread, so it certainly seems like you do.
I've already stated my view that Morrell's testimony doesn't support the notion that the Biden campaign "worked with" anyone at all on this issue. It, in fact, says the opposite, at least in regards to Morrell himself and, by extension, the others who signed the letter. Not being a member of the FBI at the time, Morrell would have no information to provide regarding whether the Biden campaign worked with the FBI.
Maybe not from ND, but I think his moderate stance brings Nikki's folks over to the Trump ticket. Still believe it will be Desantis or Haley.
It can’t be Desantis. Nor Rubio. Same state of residence. Anyways. Long been known Desantis doesn’t want to be VP. Being Gov of Fl is a better job. He’ll run again in 28.
Rubio has stated he will change his residence to another state if selected, which will allow him to be VP. Desantis could do the same, but I think Desantis likes his current job enough to stay as Governor.
Sorry to say, I cannot think of any repub women who would be good VPs, and thus one heartbeat away. Likewise for the dems - most notably with their DEI VP.
As you suggested, I checked a Fox article, which says: Morell testified that the Biden campaign "helped to strategize about the public release of the statement."
It would, if said Fox article accurately summarized the testimony, which it does not.
So, now that you sense you won't be able to support your original position that Blinken asked Morrell for help much longer, you're preemptively changing the definition of "working with."
Tulsi Gabbard has left the Demonicrat party and is rumored to be a strong contender for DJT's VP.
To keep it simple, I told you above that whether Blinkee told him or not, the big thing is that someone got the dishonest letter together and then Crow used it to lie. Right?
She backed Bernie for President in 16, way too much tape on her to be his choice, Burgum or Scott. There was a time Noem would have been the pick, she took herself out of the running with stupid decisions.
I answered by saying I didn't read the testimony, therefore I cannot answer it.
Then certainly you'll agree that you should stop making claims using said testimony as evidence, since you are unaware of what it says.
No, I was hoping you were intellectually honest to come to your conclusions based on ALL of the evidence, not just the parts of it that you like. Alas, my hopes have been dashed, as appear unwilling to engage with some of that evidence.
There are ways around it obviously but I would prefer Rs don’t bend rules after the fact to win the election . That’s a Democrat thing to do.
Huckabee.....maybe. 10 years ago, I'd have worked my ass off for Condi had she ran.
If you want to engage, why don't you just tell me what the testimony says that absolves Blinkee -- or the Crow campaign itself -- from any involvement in the letter, right up to Crow using the letter to lie to the voters during the debate. The latter will be a tough one since he is on video telling the lie, but let's see what you can do.
Condi is too old given Trump's age, and is tied to the Bush Iraq fiasco,
I already informed you of the relevant part of the testimony (but, for review, it's the part where, when asked if Blinken asked Morrell to take any action, Morrell said no), and indicated just one of many places where you could verify it. I'm not doing your homework for you. Biden's use of the letter in the debate is a separate issue that we can't even get to because you are unwilling to accept that fact.
That is racist and one of the reasons why most blacks do not vote Republican. Republicans hate diversity. As much as I despise Tim Scott, he is more than qualified for VP. Rice is qualified. Even though she is not a MAGA cultist. She won’t be picked as Chump’s VP.
Hard to believe she was qualified when she couldn’t answer what is a woman. And she’s a Supreme Court justice. Wow!
She is a progressive. Therefore, she did not want to answer that question because she is anticipating any transgender issues that may reach the Supreme Court in the future.
Is Scott a self-hating black man? Is Vivek a self-hating Indian-American? What about Haley?
With Trump now polling at about 28% with blacks, up from 13%, there's going to be a lot of self hating blacks by the time November rolls around.
Isn't the interview process used by Congress to shed light on a persons views, political, moral qualifying and otherwise.
Either did Pence, he was likely to lose in Indiana, Trump wants someone loyal to him. Burgum is really rich, that plays in his favor. I mean, I don’t know for sure, those two would be my guess, I guess Vance is in the photo.
