R's, Ind's & Libertarians -- who is your lead person Pre-Debate?
- Thread starter Boiler Buck
- Start date
Yeah. Independent minds. Tucker is so down the middle.
It couldn’t be that trump took actions that caused him to be indicted, not by Biden or the DOJ, but by citizens who looked at the evidence. But independents everywhere don’t view him as being responsible for his actions, but as a victim.
Geez dude......How about you wait until all the silly cases are done, and all the appeals are up before you decide on his guilt or innocence??
The way you post ....this post & others, you already have convicted him in your mind.
Last edited:
Trump is guilty of everything imaginable (TDS) in Bob’s mind. He probably dreams about this everyday thinking it’s all true even though it’s only subconsciously.
So you are saying that Chump is innocent of the all of the 90 or so charges?
I have no idea. Most of the charges are and have been beyond ridiculous.
As this diversion plays out, the real threat to democracy is happening right before our eyes. Most people can’t see the forest through the trees.
You can’t make false statements loser. A real loser. I look forward to taking lots of money from my nice fat little …..
Not to mention that many of the charges have been addressed before and were deemed nothing.
In the words of dem icon Nancy Pelosi, Trump will have a chance to prove his innocence in court.
Don't you agree with that, bni?
I didn’t even imply he was guilty. I said he was indicted. Fact.
You called them “silly” cases. Which one of us has already decided? Nice hypocrisy, especially for some who supposedly doesn’t like trump anymore.
Why did you delete “Independent minds. Tucker is so down the middle” from your reply? You essentially said you and Tucker think alike. He’s doesn’t have an independent bone in his body.
Yeah. Spend your time speculating what’s in my head and not giving a FF about the evidence we know about against trump.
What’s beyond ridiculous? Another MAGA calling yourself an independent while claiming trump is innocent…..of everything.
HA!!!! From the king of someone that makes comments and never backs them up
@BuilderBob6 , no need to speculate, we all know your head is a hollow sphere with ears. Man up sometime !
Right on cue, here come the Democrats “supporting” Christie.
How many Democrats do your think will be voting Republican next November….. I know, <2% and that’s only if inflation stays elevated and the economy stays in the tank
Former MSNBC host Chris Matthews deemed Christie “the liberal pinup boy right now” and New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg wrote how “amusing” it is to watch Christie rip former President Donald Trump while other candidates pledge to support him if he again wins the nomination.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/04/new-hampshire-democrats-chris-christie-00111379#:~:text=But%20a%20decade%20later%2C%20it's,with%20Democratic%20%E2%80%9Cleaners%E2%80%9D%20included.
If Republicans had a half a brain, they’d change their affiliation and all vote for Kennedy in primaries….just like the Democrats do
Here’s another Democrat revealing the real reasons Democrats support Christie….
Dick Polman, Author at New Jersey Monitor
newjerseymonitor.com
Last edited:
Is he ready? Am I ready? Ready for what?Right on cue, here come the Democrats “supporting” Christie.
How many Democrats do your think will be voting Republican next November….. I know, <2% and that’s only if inflation stays elevated and the economy stays in the tank
Former MSNBC host Chris Matthews deemed Christie “the liberal pinup boy right now” and New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg wrote how “amusing” it is to watch Christie rip former President Donald Trump while other candidates pledge to support him if he again wins the nomination.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/09/04/new-hampshire-democrats-chris-christie-00111379#:~:text=But%20a%20decade%20later%2C%20it's,with%20Democratic%20%E2%80%9Cleaners%E2%80%9D%20included.
If Republicans had a half a brain, they’d change their affiliation and all vote for Kennedy in primaries….just like the Democrats do
Here’s another Democrat revealing the real reasons Democrats support Christie….
Dick Polman, Author at New Jersey Monitor
You know what.
Just to be clear, what crime is he guilty of so far in all these indictments? Aside from documents that your boy Biden also had too.
Last edited:
That is why I call this MAGA thing a cult. Chump has put the whammy on these folks since 2015. He is one of the biggest con men I've seen. They bought into it and won't let go. These folks have defended this flawed and evil man to no end. At the same time, they will call decent republicans RINOs who are more conservative than Chump will ever be.
Lol.
Reading this @Telling The Truth poster, I'm very sure it's not my words, and I'm pretty damn sure it's not original content.
The guy is just cutting and pasting someone else I do believe. You guys are funny and a bit dense - those posts are most certainly NOT the sayings of anyone I would ever want to attribute to my name.
Comical coming from you. You made a hurtful comment to me re the benefits of weed legalization in CO and haven't backed it up after my reply.
That is why you are using a fake username, of course.
And that is why you are admitting you do believe what "Truth" is cutting and pasting.
FAKE NEWS is the enemy of the people, and Jan. 6 was a very interesting day because they don’t report it properly. People in that crowd said it was the most beautiful day they ever experienced. There was love and unity. I have never seen such spirit and such passion and such love.
ANTIFA ALERT. They’ll attack your homes if Joe’s elected. Become a Diamond Club Member.
Who is not counted in the unemployment rate?
The unemployment rate measures the share of workers in the labor force who do not currently have a job but are actively looking for work. People who have not looked for work in the past four weeks are not included in this measure.
Can you read, Google or comprehend what you are looking at?
The % unemployment rate we speak of, as I have stated on here for 20 years, is a small snap shot in time. In others words persons unemployed for 4 weeks, 6 months at max.
The labor participation rate is what matters.
The Stormy Daniels case. The FEC and other NY prosecutors have already looked into it some time back and deemed there was nothing there. But that didn't stop Bragg, even though he had expressed doubt about it himself. Nope, gotta get Trump!
Don’t convince me. Convince the Chumpers. When bragging about Chump’s unemployment numbers they never say that it just a small snap shot in time. That’s the point I’m trying to make. The numbers are good under Chump. Under Obama, all kinds of excuses to why so low under Obama. Hannity and other Faux News fools even went so far as saying that the Obama admin cooked the books to explain why the Obama unemployment rate was so low at the time.
Well when you pay people to stay at home and not look for jobs, it makes unemployment look good. This is what pretty much every Dem administration does.
Here are labor participation rates.
Labor Force Participation Rate
View data of the percentage of the total U.S. population that is neither employed nor actively seeking work.
fred.stlouisfed.org
You can see labor participation was growing and then started to stagnate under Carter, then shot up under Regan. The Bush's and Clinton didn't do much to change things, but under Obama there was a steady decline. It didn't reverse course until Trump. Then you can see the obvious Covid dip. The recovery from Covid is what our current mumbling clown is bragging about. My cat could have had a similar recovery.
Last edited:
You say "pay people tot stay at home and not look for work" Now there is another excuse to not give Obama credit for getting the unemployment rate from 9% to 4.5%. Black unemployment from 14-16% down to just under 7%.Well when you pay people to stay at home and not look for jobs, it makes unemployment look good. This is what pretty much every Dem administration does.
Here are labor participation rates.
Labor Force Participation Rate
View data of the percentage of the total U.S. population that is neither employed nor actively seeking work.fred.stlouisfed.org
You can see labor participation was growing and then started to stagnate under Carter, then shot up under Regan. The Bush's and Clinton didn't do much to change things, but under Obama there was a steady decline. It didn't reverse course until Trump. Then you can see the obvious Covid dip. The recovery from Covid is what our current mumbling clown is bragging about. My cat could have had a similar recovery.
It's not an excuse. It's reality. A large reason why unemployment went down under Obama is because the labor participation rate decreased every year he was in office. That's just a fact. You can see the data for yourself. It didn't flat line and then increase until Trump took over. That's just another fact and proof that 1. trickle down does work (to use Democrats stupid terminology) and 2. Trump was better for the economy than Obama.
Labor participation dropped 5 points under Obama. That's HUGE. It completely reversed the increase from Reagan and then some.
Again,
Under the Trump ADM job participation was at an all time high.
The job participation rate however, % of eligible workers compared to people working,
was 3rd highest all time.
The Country needs to get the eligible workers working.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
Purdue men's basketball Talking Purdue-IU with the Journal Gazette's Dylan Sinn- Latest: Casey Bartley
-
-