ADVERTISEMENT

Red Tidal Wave is coming. Poor Chuckie and Joe

The fact that you agree that democrats are the source of voter fraud, but then say it's not that big of a deal.
I didn’t agree Democrats are the source of voter fraud. From what I have seen, in 2020 there are as many cases of fraudulent votes on the right as there were on the left. I think both sides cheat. I know that historically, there have been instances of Democratic voter fraud, but that doesn’t mean there was widespread fraud in 2020 that “stole the election.” There have also been instances of Republican voter fraud.

We’ve spent millions in taxpayer dollars in places like Michigan, Nevada, and Arizona trying to uncover massive voter fraud, and we’ve found shit. In one state, we are prosecuting four voters for fraud… out of more than 3 million votes cast.

You’re a mark. That’s all you are to Trump. A mark.
 
I didn’t agree Democrats are the source of voter fraud. From what I have seen, in 2020 there are as many cases of fraudulent votes on the right as there were on the left. I think both sides cheat. I know that historically, there have been instances of Democratic voter fraud, but that doesn’t mean there was widespread fraud in 2020 that “stole the election.” There have also been instances of Republican voter fraud.

We’ve spent millions in taxpayer dollars in places like Michigan, Nevada, and Arizona trying to uncover massive voter fraud, and we’ve found shit. In one state, we are prosecuting four voters for fraud… out of more than 3 million votes cast.

You’re a mark. That’s all you are to Trump. A mark.
Keep watching MSNBC.....You'll be fed the news you want to hear.
 
I think if Donald Trump Truthed that there would be a flock of unicorns flying over southwestern Wyoming on Thanksgiving, there would be a ****ing MAGA convention there over the four day weekend, and you guys would blame the thickness of the ionosphere for why you didn’t see it.
 
I don’t watch cable news, mark. Got evidence?

Didn’t think so.
Predictably, you don't seem to know the difference between evidence and proof.

The evidence is that your views tend to be so 'literally' absurd that it is hard to believe you came up with them yourself, suggesting you heard them from well-known sources that spout some of the same nonsense.

However, if you truly came up with your nonsense on your own and can prove it, that would negate the evidence. Can you?

Didn't think so.
 
Donald Trump willfully and without evidence undermined confidence in American elections and it worked. Look no further than the marks in this thread who have devoured every bit of it hook, line, and sinker, without a shred of evidence that would have changed the outcome in 2020 at all.

He as much as told you he thought Republican voters were dumb two decades ago, and told you he could say what he wanted knowing you’d buy it, and every day, you prove him right.
Yeah, the Democrats have never questioned election integrity and/or undermined confidence in American elections. Going all the way back to 2000
 
Donald Trump willfully and without evidence undermined confidence in American elections and it worked. Look no further than the marks in this thread who have devoured every bit of it hook, line, and sinker, without a shred of evidence that would have changed the outcome in 2020 at all.

He as much as told you he thought Republican voters were dumb two decades ago, and told you he could say what he wanted knowing you’d buy it, and every day, you prove him right.
What’s your opinion on politicians who willfully and without evidence undermined confidence in American elections before Trump was involved in politics? It’s been happening for a long time and in all honesty, it didn’t start with Trump. I’m not excusing what he’s said in the past, by the way.
 
What’s your opinion on politicians who willfully and without evidence undermined confidence in American elections before Trump was involved in politics? It’s been happening for a long time and in all honesty, it didn’t start with Trump. I’m not excusing what he’s said in the past, by the way.
What do you think my opinion is?

Are you referring to Hillary? Because while a deplorable human being and someone I hope we never hear from again (just like Trump!), what she did in suggesting Russian collusion wasn't quite as bad as Trump saying that Democrats won the election because of "massive fraud". There was an investigation into Russian collusion... and it was found to be bullshit... and we moved on from it... well, except the MAGA cult that brings it up to excuse the current and ongoing lie they like to believe.

Have we moved on from Trump's Big Lie? Has he?

We have armed vigilantes in Arizona camping out at ballot boxes because they believe ballots will be stuffed in there... even though there is no evidence of "massive fraud" in the last election.

There WAS evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election, but there WAS NOT evidence that Trump or his campaign was tied to it. Of course, you'd have to be very naive to believe that China and Russia don't meddle in elections using Twitter bots, propaganda, etc., in order to get the candidate they think suits their interests.

The interesting part of the Russia thing was that all of the MAGA morons touted how there wasn't collusion, but kinda ignored the fact that it was obvious the Russians wanted Trump to be President because they believed it would weaken America.

And yes, I am aware of efforts to undermine elections even before that... lots of them. Lots of cheating scandals and accusations.

What I am NOT aware of is a sitting president (and now former President) going on publicly for almost THREE YEARS about how the election was stolen from him without being able to provide a shred of evidence to support his claim bold-faced lies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BuilderBob6
Interesting how the polls and media are still showing a lead of Fetterman...Seriously???

I'm still puzzled how defunding police, no cash bail, and emptying jails of violent criminals would have those candidates supporting those policies leading our US Citizens anywhere be it cities, counties, states and Federal.

It's mind boggling that after watching that debacle of a debate by Fetterman that people would think he's actually capable of holding office...
 
  • Like
Reactions: SDBoiler1
It's mind boggling that after watching that debacle of a debate by Fetterman that people would think he's actually capable of holding office...
Fetterman will recover from his stroke, there’s nothing that Oz will recover from that will make him decent.
 
Fetterman will recover from his stroke, there’s nothing that Oz will recover from that will make him decent.
Fetterman is unfit to hold office right now and should be convalescing to try to get better. Anyone who watched that debate could see that Fetterman is not fit to be a Senator anytime soon. The fact that the PA Dems tried to hide his condition from the public is much more concerning. But I guess since the Ds got away with it with Joe Biden hiding in his basement in 2020, they think PA voters are too dumb to know any better, too.
 
Fetterman will recover from his stroke, there’s nothing that Oz will recover from that will make him decent.
Are you a doctor? And you've assessed that Fetterman will make enough of a recovery that he'd be capable of holding office? What he should have done is step aside and let a more capable candidate run in his place until he recovers. Instead he continued to hide the seriousness of his condition until 2 weeks prior to election day and after many early voting ballots. To me that's about as disingenuous as it gets. And quite frankly, it should be illegal.
 
Fetterman is unfit to hold office right now and should be convalescing to try to get better. Anyone who watched that debate could see that Fetterman is not fit to be a Senator anytime soon. The fact that the PA Dems tried to hide his condition from the public is much more concerning. But I guess since the Ds got away with it with Joe Biden hiding in his basement in 2020, they think PA voters are too dumb to know any better, too.
I’ll never stop being in awe of your descent into full-on right wing nonsense. Your party has Lauren Boebert and MTG, some of the dumbest people to ever hold office. I would tell you to raise yourself up a level above the rest of the MAGA klan on here, but you’re obviously a lost cause.
 
  • Like
Reactions: indy35
New Haven and Bridgeport, CT too. In the last two gubernatorial elections in CT the R candidate showed a 2-2.5 percentage point lead at midnight only to wake up the next morning and find out he lost by a couple percent when a bunch of New Haven precincts had votes show up all of a sudden. Shortly thereafter the D was declared the winner. They always attribute it to machine glitches or issues with counting ballots. It’s hor$e$hit.
Do you think it takes longer to count and report a few hundred votes in a small town, or tens of thousands of votes in a city?
I don’t think you’ve stumbled onto a Democratic nefarious plot of it taking longer to count something when there’s more of it.
Or maybe you think it should take the e same amount of time to count 400 votes and is does 40,000 votes, in which case I don’t think anyone can really help you with that.
 
Are you a doctor? And you've assessed that Fetterman will make enough of a recovery that he'd be capable of holding office? What he should have done is step aside and let a more capable candidate run in his place until he recovers. Instead he continued to hide the seriousness of his condition until 2 weeks prior to election day and after many early voting ballots. To me that's about as disingenuous as it gets. And quite frankly, it should be illegal.

Are you a doctor either? No? Then maybe stfu as well.
 
Are you a doctor? And you've assessed that Fetterman will make enough of a recovery that he'd be capable of holding office? What he should have done is step aside and let a more capable candidate run in his place until he recovers. Instead he continued to hide the seriousness of his condition until 2 weeks prior to election day and after many early voting ballots. To me that's about as disingenuous as it gets. And quite frankly, it should be illegal.

I’m not a doctor but I can listen to the doctors that explain the auditory processing issue that is often part of the stroke recovery process. I’m listening to doctors while you’re listening to right wing pundits. There’s a difference in the quality of information that we are getting to come to each of our positions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BuilderBob6
Do you think Fetterman is currently unfit to serve before he’s fully recovered if he ever fully recovers? You can play arrogant liberal all you want but nobody knows if anyone will fully recover from strokes and you’re being intellectually dishonest if you really believe he’s currently fit to serve. Step out and think on your own for once. Don’t be a slave to your party masters. Use your eyes and ears.
His opening debate line says it better than we can. “Good night!”
 
  • Like
Reactions: purduepat1969
I’m not a doctor but I can listen to the doctors that explain the auditory processing issue that is often part of the stroke recovery process. I’m listening to doctors while you’re listening to right wing pundits. There’s a difference in the quality of information that we are getting to come to each of our positions.

But NONE of the doctors that are explaining this have examined him or understand the extent of his stroke. They're only going by the info Fetterman himself is releasing. I find it interesting that he refuses to allow his own medical doctor to provide a report of his condition in order to support his claims. If it's only auditory, why wouldn't he prove it?
 
I’ll never stop being in awe of your descent into full-on right wing nonsense. Your party has Lauren Boebert and MTG, some of the dumbest people to ever hold office. I would tell you to raise yourself up a level above the rest of the MAGA klan on here, but you’re obviously a lost cause.
That’s funny when you have brain surgeons and rocket scientists like Maxine Waters and AOC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG
Do you think it takes longer to count and report a few hundred votes in a small town, or tens of thousands of votes in a city?
I don’t think you’ve stumbled onto a Democratic nefarious plot of it taking longer to count something when there’s more of it.
Or maybe you think it should take the e same amount of time to count 400 votes and is does 40,000 votes, in which case I don’t think anyone can really help you with that.
It’s simply Dem-controlled incompetence.
 
I’m not a doctor but I can listen to the doctors that explain the auditory processing issue that is often part of the stroke recovery process. I’m listening to doctors while you’re listening to right wing pundits. There’s a difference in the quality of information that we are getting to come to each of our positions.
Do you really want someone needing speech processing equipment trying to make legislative decisions? Call me an “ableist” - the newest harangue you jagoffs have come up with - sexist, homophobic, Islamophobic, racist……, but Fetterman has no business holding office right now. I hope he makes a full recovery - but just not as a US Senator.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BSIT
Are they brighter than AOC and Tlaib? Klan with a K? You’re mad today after you were put into timeout on here for over a month. Keep taking your misery out on Republicans here. You’re doing great!!! May be time to message a mod and play victim.

Why do you think aoc and tlaib aren’t bright?
 
Why do you think aoc and tlaib aren’t bright?
Because they aren’t? AOC is a complete airhead spouting off the latest Progressive talking points. How many YouTube videos do you need to see to make this point? There are hundreds of them showing her saying completely asinine comments. She should have stayed as a barista. She’d be much better than as a US Representative.

Tlaib is an anti-Semite and also a gasbag Progressive. She’s somewhat brighter than AOC, but that’s not saying much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BSIT
Do you really want someone needing speech processing equipment trying to make legislative decisions? Call me an “ableist” - the newest harangue you jagoffs have come up with - sexist, homophobic, Islamophobic, racist……, but Fetterman has no business holding office right now. I hope he makes a full recovery - but just not as a US Senator.
And I thought the Dems called someone a racist who puts a shotgun in an innocent unarmed black man's chest? As usual from the hypocrite party
 
Because they aren’t? AOC is a complete airhead spouting off the latest Progressive talking points. How many YouTube videos do you need to see to make this point? There are hundreds of them showing her saying completely asinine comments. She should have stayed as a barista. She’d be much better than as a US Representative.

Tlaib is an anti-Semite and also a gasbag Progressive. She’s somewhat brighter than AOC, but that’s not saying much.

So she isn’t bright because you disagree with her?
 
  • Like
Reactions: indy35
Because they aren’t? AOC is a complete airhead spouting off the latest Progressive talking points. How many YouTube videos do you need to see to make this point? There are hundreds of them showing her saying completely asinine comments. She should have stayed as a barista. She’d be much better than as a US Representative.

Tlaib is an anti-Semite and also a gasbag Progressive. She’s somewhat brighter than AOC, but that’s not saying much.
Racist hypocrites
 
  • Like
Reactions: bonefish1
That’s funny when you have brain surgeons and rocket scientists like Maxine Waters and AOC.
Lol I mean if that’s all you’ve got to compare to Lauren and Marge you have proved my point tenfold. What a mess you’ve become. Alex Jones would be proud.
 
It’s simply Dem-controlled incompetence.
Alright, so talking about it in political terms won’t get us anywhere. Let’s use something simple. Say apples, there’s a cart of about 400 apples and another cart of about 40,000 apples. If you had to count each cart and report exactly how many there were, do you think it would take longer to count the 40,000 apples?

I hope this was broken down simply enough for you to follow and that you can realize it’s not a conspiracy that larger numbers take longer to count.
 
Do you really want someone needing speech processing equipment trying to make legislative decisions? Call me an “ableist” - the newest harangue you jagoffs have come up with - sexist, homophobic, Islamophobic, racist……, but Fetterman has no business holding office right now. I hope he makes a full recovery - but just not as a US Senator.
I guess you’re also in favor of kicking out anyone that needs a hearing aid?
 
Alright, so talking about it in political terms won’t get us anywhere. Let’s use something simple. Say apples, there’s a cart of about 400 apples and another cart of about 40,000 apples. If you had to count each cart and report exactly how many there were, do you think it would take longer to count the 40,000 apples?

I hope this was broken down simply enough for you to follow and that you can realize it’s not a conspiracy that larger numbers take longer to count.
There was actually a time when SD would engage with you on topics. Those days are sadly long gone. Your odds are better if you try to converse with the aluminum foil hat he’s wearing.
 
There was actually a time when SD would engage with you on topics. Those days are sadly long gone. Your odds are better if you try to converse with the aluminum foil hat he’s wearing.
No, the SDBoiler I know used to argue stuff like it was a fact that Obama was a secret gay man, and as proof he was using something like the National Enquirer. I certainly don’t remember a reasonable guy.
 
No, the SDBoiler I know used to argue stuff like it was a fact that Obama was a secret gay man, and as proof he was using something like the National Enquirer. I certainly don’t remember a reasonable guy.
Well the bar I was comparing him to was buried about ten feet below ground. He argued at about five feet below ground but if that’s what he was arguing yeah then he’s just a fukking whacko too.
 
Well the bar I was comparing him to was buried about ten feet below ground. He argued at about five feet below ground but if that’s what he was arguing yeah then he’s just a fukking whacko too.
I hope you two enjoy the drubbing the Ds are going to take on 11/8. Maybe you’ll finally wake up to the fact that Progressive policies are not as popular as you seem to think they are. It’s moronic to think that running on abortion, the Green New Deal, and DACA nationwide is wise when inflation is running rampant and millions of American see the economy going in the shitter as gas, heating costs, electric bills, food, clothes and other necessities keep going up and up. Now I suppose you’ll try to argue “it’s NOT the economy, stupid?”
 
  • Like
Reactions: tjreese
I hope you two enjoy the drubbing the Ds are going to take on 11/8. Maybe you’ll finally wake up to the fact that Progressive policies are not as popular as you seem to think they are. It’s moronic to think that running on abortion, the Green New Deal, and DACA nationwide is wise when inflation is running rampant and millions of American see the economy going in the shitter as gas, heating costs, electric bills, food, clothes and other necessities keep going up and up. Now I suppose you’ll try to argue “it’s NOT the economy, stupid?”
It’s a trip watching you double down on your ignorance and stupidity, SD. Sheeeeeeeep!!!
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT