I think he is misleading about carrying a weapon in war insinuating he was in harms way and we have no weapons of war. It’s just another brick in his wall of crazy feelings. If he were interested in lowering deaths close the border and lead a charge against abortion. Those two have led to more deaths than guns even if you included suicide and multiplied the deaths by a thousand
Actually, you have described a common fault in all liberals. There exists a certain mental flaw of neurosis to want to control from cradle to grave as though they know pushing for a revolution rather than a possible evolution. It goes back to everyone has an island of knowledge and some islands are larger than others, but all are dwarfed by the sea (of ignorance). When things don't work out they will try again with a new face believing the problem was the one in charge, rather than the product implemented. Truly the schools have failed in producing an educated voter...The guy is a control freak. Won't be happy until the state rules every tiny aspect of your life. Absolute wingnut ticket.
It is their voter block. They are not smart enough to know the difference in a lot of things. This just happens to be one easy to see... That said, it is effective for their votersMakes it pretty clear that his "Military Service" meant nothing if he doesn't know the difference between a semi-automatic AR and a fully auto M16 that the military would carry.
I've found my liberal friends are usually somewhat lazy in that don't want to read, to listen, or to find out real answers. ABC, MSNBC, CNN are their bibles, and Fox is controlled by the Anti-Christ.It is their voter block. They are not smart enough to know the difference in a lot of things. This just happens to be one easy to see... That said, it is effective for their voters
No question those sites are a favorite for them as well as the View. It also can appear that they are immune from understanding the circular speech that goes on. Where it appears to me a major difference is the value of a historical perspective. I think conservatives more than libs are influenced by a historical perspective and as we should ALL know the vices of man have not changed over thousands of years. He still has his flaws. Therefore conservatives that hold the constrained view understand that, and seek to move a bit slower fully aware that "everyone has an Island of knowledge and some have islands larger than others, but ALL are dwarfed by the sea (of ignorance). Libs leaning more to the unconstrained view believe that man is very moldable and that they can make the world what it needs to be...not constrained by a historical understanding of man through history. They just need the right molder of man because "they" know what needs to be done to make man how they want.I've found my liberal friends are usually somewhat lazy in that don't want to read, to listen, or to find out real answers. ABC, MSNBC, CNN are their bibles, and Fox is controlled by the Anti-Christ.