Last season, Purdue was fourth in the Big Ten during conference games in rebounding margin with the three teams above them all losing their best rebounders. Purdue was also virtually tied with Iowa for the best conference offensive rebounding percentage.
However, defensive rebounding was an issue, with Purdue yielding 207 offensive rebounds in 18 conference games, most in the Big Ten. Part of the reason for that was that Hammons challenged a lot of shots (and rarely boxed out well) and that Purdue was not big at the forward positions.
With Swanigan in the mix, I am hoping that Purdue can take a big step forward in defensive rebounding while also improving offensive rebounding. When Hammons challenges shots, Swanigan, Edwards, Davis, and others hopefully can clean up the boards.
Purdue needs to capitalize on its size and strength and make rebounding a huge advantage this season.
However, defensive rebounding was an issue, with Purdue yielding 207 offensive rebounds in 18 conference games, most in the Big Ten. Part of the reason for that was that Hammons challenged a lot of shots (and rarely boxed out well) and that Purdue was not big at the forward positions.
With Swanigan in the mix, I am hoping that Purdue can take a big step forward in defensive rebounding while also improving offensive rebounding. When Hammons challenges shots, Swanigan, Edwards, Davis, and others hopefully can clean up the boards.
Purdue needs to capitalize on its size and strength and make rebounding a huge advantage this season.