ADVERTISEMENT

Question for board Cons

Thank you for finally admitting the unequal justice under the Dem DOJ & FBI.

Took awhile, but some nuts are harder to crack. LOL.
I said I knew of no arrests for sedition in Seattle.. I stated a fact......which you were just waiting for to spring your trap.........and somehow come to the conclusion I admitted your fantasy is true. Pretty big reach there ace.......that because there were no sedition charges in Seattle it of course means that the DOJ doesn't/didn't administer equal justice. I guess that goes for the DOJ under trump too.

It couldn't be that Barr didn't think Seattle fit the sedition statute, or he didn't have evidence, or didn't think he could prove it in court. And you have no knowledge of the details of the case in DC, no knowledge of what is yet to come. I don't think you are a lawyer or an expert in the law.

But somehow you know that if the DC case is judged as sedition, the Seattle case should be as well, and therefore justice is not blind. Once again, as always, not matter what the circumstances, trump and his republicans are the victims.
 
LOL, I never said it happened everywhere. One of the videos you linked was already in the building. The other is outside. So you have one outside where they were fighting and I have one where they were let in. The other video you linked seems to be broken. LOL reality denier. That's rich.
Of course you didn't. You just throw out one instance of where the clear pattern of violent entry didn't happen, use that as an argument, then pretend that's the norm.

More video of the cops opening the gates.

 
Of course you didn't. You just throw out one instance of where the clear pattern of violent entry didn't happen, use that as an argument, then pretend that's the norm.
Bob, the Capital Police had guns, pepper spray, rubber bullets, live ammo, tear gas. They didn't use any of it because they are nancyboy cowards.

Back in the early 1960s that was a TV show named Branded starring Chuck Conners. He played an Army officer back in the old days who had disgraced himself. In the opening scene, his commanding officer took his sword from him and broke it over his knee, then ripped the epaulets off of his shoulders, and then back-handed him out of the Army. That’s what should be done to the Capital Police.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boiler Buck
Bob, the Capital Police had guns, pepper spray, rubber bullets, live ammo, tear gas. They didn't use any of it because they are nancyboy cowards.

Back in the early 1960s that was a TV show named Branded starring Chuck Conners. He played an Army officer back in the old days who had disgraced himself. In the opening scene, his commanding officer took his sword from him and broke it over his knee, then ripped the epaulets off of his shoulders, and then back-handed him out of the Army. That’s what should be done to the Capital Police.
Ok Rambo. I'm sure it would have turned out better for everybody if the police had just started firing on the crowd. I'm sure their rules of engagement included shooting unarmed civilians.

Would have been a good look for the trump admin too..........bodies and blood on the steps of the building where the greatest democracy in the world resides. Trump probably would have stood and watched that happen too, reveling in all the citizens dying for his lie.
 
Ok Rambo. I'm sure it would have turned out better for everybody if the police had just started firing on the crowd.
Bob, you missed the part where I said ". . . the Capital Police had guns, pepper spray, rubber bullets, live ammo, tear gas. . . ."

No, I didn't say 'shoot 'em all in the head'. The Capital Police should have used whatever force was needed to keep the mob out of the Capital building. One more time, focus now, OK? The Capital Police should have used whatever force was needed to keep the mob out of the Capital building.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Boiler Buck
Of course you didn't. You just throw out one instance of where the clear pattern of violent entry didn't happen, use that as an argument, then pretend that's the norm.

More video of the cops opening the gates.

I never acted like it was the norm. Nice video of about 15 people trying to get through the fence there. Could this be the breach team half full of feds while Trump was still speaking? LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: guidelinesa2
So again, if they had control of the Capitol, why give it up so easily? Wouldn’t that have prevented certification? Why not chase after the representatives?

The “insurrectionists” had control of the Capitol and they just ….gave it up. Why?
An educated guess is that they ran out of paper to draw the ugly pictures on. Speaking of real threats in thousands of locations I was a bit surprised the Texas Hostage taker wasn't a white supremist named Joe Smith. Anyone know if Malik Faisal Akram belongs to the religion of peace? https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/attacks.aspx?Yr=Last30
FJPr-C-WYAIRUgK
 
I never acted like it was the norm. Nice video of about 15 people trying to get through the fence there. Could this be the breach team half full of feds while Trump was still speaking? LOL
So what do you mean when you say something like "You obviously didn't see the video of the police opening the gates and waving people in."?

That the gate opening was an isolated incident? Then your statement means nothing. That it happened everywhere? Not supported by the facts. So you're saying what, exactly? Just finding a crack or an inconsistency so you can keep up the argument while not admitting what is obvious? Anecdotal BS. Worst of all, you know you're doing it and you're fine with it..........cause it's all about winning, not the truth.

Which trump media group is telling you the breach team was full of feds? Were they following Ray's orders too?
 
So what do you mean when you say something like "You obviously didn't see the video of the police opening the gates and waving people in."?

That the gate opening was an isolated incident? Then your statement means nothing. That it happened everywhere? Not supported by the facts. So you're saying what, exactly? Just finding a crack or an inconsistency so you can keep up the argument while not admitting what is obvious? Anecdotal BS. Worst of all, you know you're doing it and you're fine with it..........cause it's all about winning, not the truth.

Which trump media group is telling you the breach team was full of feds? Were they following Ray's orders too?
I feel like the point is pretty obvious. That not everyone that went up to the Capitol was violent. From what I've seen, the violent people was a very small number of the total.
 
So what do you mean when you say something like "You obviously didn't see the video of the police opening the gates and waving people in."?

That the gate opening was an isolated incident? Then your statement means nothing. That it happened everywhere? Not supported by the facts. So you're saying what, exactly? Just finding a crack or an inconsistency so you can keep up the argument while not admitting what is obvious? Anecdotal BS. Worst of all, you know you're doing it and you're fine with it..........cause it's all about winning, not the truth.

Which trump media group is telling you the breach team was full of feds? Were they following Ray's orders too?
Come on, Bob.

I mean one day it was antifa storming the Capitol. Then another it was BLM. Then it was an inside job by the FBI. Then it was just some tourists who got carried away. Then it was the Capitol police being pussies who should let everyone in and then should have opened fire. But the one person who was rightly shot wasn’t doing anything wrong, so she’s a martyr for all the aggrieved and oppressed right wingers out there. But there’s no need for an investigation, which is odd because if it really was Antifa and blm, one would think the folks on here would be all about it. Any other spots the goalposts haven’t been moved to yet?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BuilderBob6
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT