What am I missing? It's not where the ball crosses the out of bounds marker. It's where he lands because he wasn't out of bounds until he landed...
Why wouldn’t it be?So they said the spot is where the ball crosses the out of bounds line not where it finishes? Guess I never realized that...
I don't think that's the full rule...So they said the spot is where the ball crosses the out of bounds line not where it finishes? Guess I never realized that...
because you're not out until you land out. It's not a plain to cross. I think they f'd that up in the booth.Why wouldn’t it be?
we squandered great field position too much.Tate smells blood in water....D better step it up
It's correct call, just like a punt or kickoff, when it cross out of bounds line that's where it is marked. It is an invisible wall of sorts to infinity.because you're not out until you land out. It's not a plain to cross. I think they f'd that up in the booth.
so if your streaking down the sidelines in bounds but stick the ball out over the line it out of bounds? I think not. So why is it on this type play.
exactlyso if your streaking down the sidelines in bounds but stick the ball out over the line it out of bounds? I think not. So why is it on this type play.
For example, think a diving tip toe sideline catch at the goal line. If I catch it inbounds and the ball doesn't go inside of the pylon ever it is marked where the ball left the field if I never brought it back in. Even though my body may have fallen across the goaline if the ball was outside the pylon (sideline side) it is not a TD.You mean if I am running down the sideline with the ball in my arm over the out of bounds and my feet in the ball goes there?
don't we have any screen plays?So you are telling me that a runner or receiver running down the sideline and stays totally inbounds but his arm carrying the ball goes over the line that play is halted?
I have never seen that call made and I do not believe it.
show me the rule.It's correct call, just like a punt or kickoff, when it cross out of bounds line that's where it is marked. It is an invisible wall of sorts to infinity.
Also if we don't win I'm banning Foster Farms products with my Home Owner's Association for the neighborhood.
The play would never be stopped as you were not down or touched out of bounds. This only comes into play if the runner is down, wherever the ball broke the out of bounds line is it marked, if it was not brought back into the field of play before the runner down.So you are telling me that a runner or receiver running down the sideline and stays totally inbounds but his arm carrying the ball goes over the line that play is halted?
I have never seen that call made and I do not believe it.
not if you had a foot down lol...good try. he was established in bounds and fell out of bounds. Your comparison is terrible.For example, think a diving tip toe sideline catch at the goal line. If I catch it inbounds and the ball doesn't go inside of the pylon ever it is marked where the ball left the field if I never brought it back in. Even though my body may have fallen across the goaline if the ball was outside the pylon (sideline side) it is not a TD.
So if the ball is out of bounds but my arms catch the ball and both feet are in bounds. Is it a catch?
This really require clarification? Bailey has been solid. Anthony...meh21 is Bailey, so what are you on about?
i mean we need new rules on the spot. clearly makes the game better.today that would not be ruled a catch
For example, think a diving tip toe sideline catch at the goal line. If I catch it inbounds and the ball doesn't go inside of the pylon ever it is marked where the ball left the field if I never brought it back in. Even though my body may have fallen across the goaline if the ball was outside the pylon (sideline side) it is not a TD.