ADVERTISEMENT

PJ Fleck: Western Mich HC

Jamey Chadwell is a better coach than Spack, Stitt has an innovative offense. I really wanted Dino Babers, but they didn't have enough balls to fire Hazell. My List for best coaches to hire for Purdue this season include P.J. Fleck, Jeff Brohm, Scott Satterfield, Mike Leach, any of the sucessful Big 12 Offensive coordinators, any of Ohio State's coordinators, Kevin Sumlin, and on the bottom of the list is the FCS guys (Jamey Chadwell, Bob Stitt, Brock Spack).
Chadwell doesn`t have the experience that Spack has so I disagree that he is a better coach.Except for Leach Spack has more coaching experience than any that you named.
 
I think you're underestimating him -- he was Tiller's #2 for a reason, and Tiller's a pretty good judge of coaching talent.

If he was that great, and we didn't pay our coordinators worth a damn, someone would have poached him for more money. That never happened...
 
  • Like
Reactions: boilerpt
Oh, so we should hire Chadwell because he's a "better coach" than Spack. That explains it? At the risk of exploring the depths of your analysis beyond the surface, let me then ask, WHY do you think he's a better coach? I seem to recall that Spack also has some experience with innovative offenses.
What? At Purdue? You know he was the DC right?
 
If he was that great, and we didn't pay our coordinators worth a damn, someone would have poached him for more money. That never happened...

No, you're wrong. Wisconsin offered him their DC spot in 06, I believe it was, to replace Bielema after he took over for Alvarez. It was widely known that Alvarez thought Spack had been the best DC in the B1G for years, especially at doing more with less. But Spack turned them down when PU countered, even though PU countered at way less than Wisky offered, because Spack was told by MB that he was the heir apparent to Tiller. And Tiller clearly wanted Spack to be his successor because he thought Spack was the most qualified guy in his coaching tree.

The biggest mistake Spack ever made in his coaching career was turning down Wisky. Had he gone in 2006, all us dumb PU fans would have blamed the program's stagnation at the end of the Tiller era on the absence of Spack, and he would have been welcomed back by PU in 2009 as the savior. Instead, he got thrown out with the bath water. That was PU's loss -- time to fix it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TopSecretBoiler
What? At Purdue? You know he was the DC right?

Do you actually think the DC and Asst. HC doesn't know his own team's offense? In Tiller's book, he mentions that his version of the "basketball on grass" offense was developed through "war-gaming" it against Spack.
 
No, you're wrong. Wisconsin offered him their DC spot in 06, I believe it was, to replace Bielema after he took over for Alvarez. It was widely known that Alvarez thought Spack had been the best DC in the B1G for years, especially at doing more with less. But Spack turned them down when PU countered, even though PU countered at way less than Wisky offered, because Spack was told by MB that he was the heir apparent to Tiller. And Tiller clearly wanted Spack to be his successor because he thought Spack was the most qualified guy in his coaching tree.

The biggest mistake Spack ever made in his coaching career was turning down Wisky. Had he gone in 2006, all us dumb PU fans would have blamed the program's stagnation at the end of the Tiller era on the absence of Spack, and he would have been welcomed back by PU in 2009 as the savior. Instead, he got thrown out with the bath water. That was PU's loss -- time to fix it.

Tell him hi at thanksgiving for us. He's not what we need sorry. Don't give a damn about the supposed Wisconsin thing, never happened. Not like he has been a hot commodity lately.
 
Tell him hi at thanksgiving for us. He's not what we need sorry. Don't give a damn about the supposed Wisconsin thing, never happened. Not like he has been a hot commodity lately.

Funny!

I don't know him other than speaking with him a few times at JPC meetings.

Are you suggesting the Wisky offer never happened? Then you'd be wrong again. That whole dance is public knowledge and was covered closely by GBI at that time.

As for what we need, thankfully, it's not your call to decide.
 
Funny!

I don't know him other than speaking with him a few times at JPC meetings.

Are you suggesting the Wisky offer never happened? Then you'd be wrong again. That whole dance is public knowledge and was covered closely by GBI at that time.

As for what we need, thankfully, it's not your call to decide.

No I'm saying I don't care because he didn't take that job. Fact is he never left Purdue, defenses got worse the longer he was here, and he hasn't sniffed a P-5 job since. Like I said not really a hot commodity. Wouldn't do squat for the team or fans.
 
No I'm saying I don't care because he didn't take that job. Fact is he never left Purdue, defenses got worse the longer he was here, and he hasn't sniffed a P-5 job since. Like I said not really a hot commodity. Wouldn't do squat for the team or fans.

Wow, so one has to be a "hot commodity" to make your cut, sorta like DH2 was a few years back? What you really mean is that you haven't heard Spack's name on espn multiple times in the last few weeks.
 
Wow, so one has to be a "hot commodity" to make your cut, sorta like DH2 was a few years back? What you really mean is that you haven't heard Spack's name on espn multiple times in the last few weeks.

Quit grasping. You read and interpret what you want. What I am saying and read this next part slowly... If he was such a great coach, like you claim, he would have offers coming in from schools similar to us. He hasn't and he won't. There's a reason he is at the FCS level. If he was what you want him to be he'd have another opportunity at the FBS level already, because he has won games at ISU. There's a reason he hasn't been given that chance. Outside of Urban or Sabban, and a few others very few are mentioned on ESPN often so your reaching is laughable. He's done well at Illinois State, nothing against the man. You think he'd be great here as the head coach, I don't. Nothing more to it.
 
Last edited:
Quit grasping. You read and interpret what you want. What I am saying and read this next part slowly... If he was such a great coach, like you claim, he would have offers coming in from schools similar to us. He hasn't and he won't. There's a reason he is at the FCS level. If he was what you want him to be he'd have another opportunity at the FBS level already, because he has won games at ISU. There's a reason he hasn't been given that chance. Outside of Urban or Sabban, and a few others very few are mentioned on ESPN often so your grasping is laughable. He's done well at Illinois State, nothing against the man. You think he'd be great here as the head coach, I don't. Nothing more to it.

Grasping?

So in your world, all human capital is in equilibrium, everyone is employed where they deserve, no one's career gets sidetracked by uncontrollable circumstances (i.e., nothing is path dependent), and there are no undervalued assets. I think it's safe to say that you wouldn't have hired Joe Tiller, either. Like Morgan, you probably would have gone for the big name first, Bob Dave, wasn't it, or maybe Glen Mason?
 
You're impossible. This is hilarious, I can't go back and forth with you because clearly you have issue with me saying we have differing opinions on him being a good fit. Or maybe I'll just agree with you Spack for HC 2017. Make Purdue coaches have a Mustache again!
 
You're impossible. This is hilarious, I can't go back and forth with you because clearly you have issue with me saying we have differing opinions on him being a good fit. Or maybe I'll just agree with you Spack for HC 2017. Make Purdue coaches have a Mustache again!

No, I don't have an issue with you having a different opinion -- I'm just saying the basis for your opinion, as you've explained, makes no sense to me, or maybe I should say it suggests to me that you just want to hire a guy whose name pops up a lot on ESPN.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JohnnyDoeBoiler
No, I don't have an issue with you having a different opinion -- I'm just saying the basis for your opinion, as you've explained, makes no sense to me.

Because you've twisted every word to fit your agenda of Spack 17! More power to you, if that's your guy that's your guy. He's just far from the direction I think we should go. Is that okay sir? I'll number my reasons for you

1. His defenses got worse the longer he coached here.
2. I don't think he could recruit at a level we need to rebuild our roster.
3. There's a reason he hasn't been given another opportunity at a high level such as P-5. What that is I couldnt tell you.
4. He would do very little to excite the fanbase, as a large majority wanted to see him go because his defenses underperformed late in his time here.
5. Our program is in shambles and a Brock Spack hire would do nothing to rejuvinate it, again my opinion.
6. I believe he would have very similar results to Danny Hope, again personal opinion, but I'd rather go for something greater.
 
Last edited:
Because you've twisted every word to fit your agenda of Spack 17! More power to you, if that's your guy that's your guy. He's just far from the direction I think we should go. Is that okay sir? Or is that confusing?

No, I get it. You don't want to hire Spack because that wouldn't be a "hot commodity" hire that would impress everyone on ESPN, like hiring DH2 was impressive (somewhat) 3 years ago. I was just suggesting that your reasoning is flawed, but you're certainly entitled to your opinions.
 
No, I get it. You don't want to hire Spack because that wouldn't be a "hot commodity" hire that would impress everyone on ESPN, like hiring DH2 was impressive (somewhat) 3 years ago. I was just suggesting that your reasoning is flawed, but you're certainly entitled to your opinions.

Jesus I couldn't care less about freaking ESPN. It's like talking to a wall. I'll see y'all at the game Saturday, need a break from this place.
 
Because you've twisted every word to fit your agenda of Spack 17! More power to you, if that's your guy that's your guy. He's just far from the direction I think we should go. Is that okay sir? I'll number my reasons for you

1. His defenses got worse the longer he coached here.
-- because talent fell off in Tiller's last few years due to PU falling further behind in facilities -- and what talent they did have was cherry picked by the offense -- this is Tiller's explanation for the D's decline at the end of his run.

2. I don't think he could recruit at a level we need to rebuild our roster.
-- so this is like a "feeling" you have, or is it based in something more substantive? Tell me. Maybe I'm missing something?

3. There's a reason he hasn't been given another opportunity at a high level such as P-5. What that is I couldnt tell you.
-- just when would that have happened? He just took the ILL State position as a rebuilding job in 2009. Only his last couple teams have reflected what he can do. Regardless, so you're saying we shouldn't hire him because nobody else already hired him? Isn't that sort of how good looking girls don't get asked to the prom?

4. He would do very little to excite the fanbase, as a large majority wanted to see him go because his defenses underperformed late in his time here.
-- yes, well the football acumen of our "fan base" is well documented. They will get excited when we win. I could care less if they're excited before the next coach's first game. We all got excited about DH2, until we saw him coach -- what has that gotten us?!

5. Our program is in shambles and a Brock Spack hire would do nothing to rejuvinate it, again my opinion.
-- yes, your opinion, and you're entitled to it -- although it might be more or less relevant to the rest of us if we knew if there's a substantive basis for it, other than feelings.

6. I believe he would have very similar results to Danny Hope, again personal opinion, but I'd rather go for something greater.
-- well, by all means, I'm for the greatest we can get. But we don't really know who the greatest will be until after they've been here a few years, right. This along with your "hot commodity" comment is what suggests to me that you just want a name fans across the country will view as recognizable (as in a household name on ESPN).
 
I support P.J. Fleck because I think he would be a good pick.
 
Because you've twisted every word to fit your agenda of Spack 17! More power to you, if that's your guy that's your guy. He's just far from the direction I think we should go. Is that okay sir? I'll number my reasons for you

1. His defenses got worse the longer he coached here.
2. I don't think he could recruit at a level we need to rebuild our roster.
3. There's a reason he hasn't been given another opportunity at a high level such as P-5. What that is I couldnt tell you.
4. He would do very little to excite the fanbase, as a large majority wanted to see him go because his defenses underperformed late in his time here.
5. Our program is in shambles and a Brock Spack hire would do nothing to rejuvinate it, again my opinion.
6. I believe he would have very similar results to Danny Hope, again personal opinion, but I'd rather go for something greater.

ESPN TAKEAWAY:

Illinois State: The Redbirds suffered a 37-3 loss in their previous visit to Ryan Field in 2010. That was coach Brock Spack's second season and Saturday's result shows how far the program has come since then. With Kolbe and Warrum leading a high-powered offensive attack, the Redbirds should again be one of the better teams in FCS.
 
ESPN TAKEAWAY:

Illinois State: The Redbirds suffered a 37-3 loss in their previous visit to Ryan Field in 2010. That was coach Brock Spack's second season and Saturday's result shows how far the program has come since then. With Kolbe and Warrum leading a high-powered offensive attack, the Redbirds should again be one of the better teams in FCS.

Couldn't care less bud. We've established we differ on Spack. Move on.
 
Couldn't care less bud. We've established we differ on Spack. Move on.

Open minded, huh?

No matter, I wasn't posting it for you -- we've established that your opinion isn't a product of substance.

But I see several others here on the board -- in other threads -- were impressed by the Redbirds today, and recognize that what Spack has done at ILL State shouldn't be dismissed so flippantly.
 
Open minded, huh?

No matter, I wasn't posting it for you -- we've established that your opinion isn't a product of substance.

But I see several others here on the board -- in other threads -- were impressed by the Redbirds today, and recognize that what Spack has done at ILL State shouldn't be dismissed so flippantly.

You copied my post how is that not posting it for me. Move on. I said nothing wrong and you toss insults on a message board, whatever makes you feel good friend. I've never once bad mouthed him. Said I appreciate what he did while he was here, and he's done well at ISU. That doesn't mean I have to want him, it's perfectly okay that someone doesn't feel the same way you do.
 
You copied my post how is that not posting it for me. Move on. I said nothing wrong and you toss insults on a message board, whatever makes you feel good friend. I've never once bad mouthed him. Said I appreciate what he did while he was here, and he's done well at ISU. That doesn't mean I have to want him, it's perfectly okay that someone doesn't feel the same way you do.

It's a thread. Threads build on previous posts. That doesn't mean subsequent posts are intended only for the author of the post one replies to.
 
It's a thread. Threads build on previous posts. That doesn't mean subsequent posts are intended only for the author of the post one replies to.

I mean it's not required to copy someone's. It's one of many features. This is pointless, move on. Head over to ESPNU and watch Etling likely kill it, and make all of our stumachs churn with disappointment that DH2 ruins QB's.
 
Sumlin isnt going anywhere...especially to Purdue. Timing is totally out of kilter with our immediate situation.
 
The people up in here that said that Fleck wasn't a good candidate need to get out. Him and Hazell are only similar in that coached at MAC schools (So did Nick Saban and Urban Meyer), that's where the similarities end and differences begin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: studed
34-10 in the 4th. And he shows emotion/excitement on the sideline. We haven't seen any emotion in 4 seasons.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT