ADVERTISEMENT

Pathetic

This is why millennials get a bad name. You deserve to have an opinion. Backing it up with the age comment completely invalidates anything you said prior to or after.
This team is not average. Perhaps in time you'll have enough data to realize it.
He said "in March" which is being nice. We haven't even been average in March, we've been bad in the NCAA tourney of late.
 
It would of stopped the 3s they were hitting today. The corners are what kills a 3-2 zone not straight on 3s. Clueless...
Your telling me they couldn't adjust and shoot from the corners? They weren't missing anything. The reason they were hitting from the top is because they were shooting from the top because they were running high ball screen action. You shut down deep shooting off of high ball screens by switching. That worked in half two. Extending a zone that far opens it up and exposes the middle. So yeah. Clueless.
 
He said "in March" which is being nice. We haven't even been average in March, we've been bad in the NCAA tourney of late.
Well then, I strongly disagree. THIS team hasn't played in March at all. If you want to look at averages then out of 350+ teams, the average would be around 175 or so. I am pretty sure, even when adding in the down years in Painters career, Purdue has been well above average. That's math and all ya know.
 
I know you guys think Michigan was godly today but saying changing the defense would of been dumb makes no sense. Honestly Purdue was lucky to get back into it. Their d wasnt much better in the 2nd half Michigan just missed a bunch of wide open 3s. If you watched the 2nd half you would of seen that just because their 3s didnt go in doesn't mean Purdue was playing better D. Michigan had every chance to end Purdue's run before it got to 6 its not like Purdue locked them up.
So you don't believe that changing the way man to man is played changed its effectiveness. OK. I'm done wasting time with a nag student.
 
  • Like
Reactions: boiler-deuce
Dear god Michigan hit crazy shots in the first half and missed easy ones in the second half. You liking Matt Painter can't change that so you guys just resort to calling me clueless. Why do these boards have to have everyone like minded? Yes I don't like Painter but I still love the Boilers and support the players. I know that's hard for some fans to wrap their heads around but I'm tired of being an average/below average team in March and I blame Painter. You guys can blame whatever you want but I blame Painter for two pathetic first round exits the last two years. Look at his last three tournaments: Kansas, Cincinatti, and Little Rock all were big leads blown. I don't mark those up to bad luck. Now I am a younger fan so I am not as used to being average as you old timers but I think it sucks. I know I will take a lot of heat from the old "tough guys" on here but I don't care.
Try backing your opinion with an explanation related to how the game is played instead if attacking age or at least the age you assume us to be. The clueless description eminates from the tired refrain of blaming a coach, any coach for a loss that was earned by the players on the floor, from both sides. Your defense was that Michigan would not have been able to hit all those threes from the corners if we played a 3-2. I don't get the tough guys comment at all. Haven't seen anyone threaten you in any way. Just disagree with you. If that's tough, so be it.
 
What is this? A Dumber and Dumber skit???
Nah, just a Purdue message board where tiny penis mentalities of all opposing views cannot speak respectfully. IU fans are called heinous names. Purdue fans who disagree with something are called heinous names. Purdue fans who have a belief are called heinous names. Make this a FB log in with real names confirmed and many of these folks go quiet.
 
Nah, just a Purdue message board where tiny penis mentalities of all opposing views cannot speak respectfully. IU fans are called heinous names. Purdue fans who disagree with something are called heinous names. Purdue fans who have a belief are called heinous names. Make this a FB log in with real names confirmed and many of these folks go quiet.

I'm not getting into the other stuff in this thread, but this one comment is absolutely true.
 
I can't imagine anyone thinking a zone would have stopped the outside shot. Most folks fully understand that a zone basically in an attempt to shut down penetration and give up the outside shooting. You're telling your opponent to take the 3. A silly argument.
 
Dear god Michigan hit crazy shots in the first half and missed easy ones in the second half. You liking Matt Painter can't change that so you guys just resort to calling me clueless. Why do these boards have to have everyone like minded? Yes I don't like Painter but I still love the Boilers and support the players. I know that's hard for some fans to wrap their heads around but I'm tired of being an average/below average team in March and I blame Painter. You guys can blame whatever you want but I blame Painter for two pathetic first round exits the last two years. Look at his last three tournaments: Kansas, Cincinatti, and Little Rock all were big leads blown. I don't mark those up to bad luck. Now I am a younger fan so I am not as used to being average as you old timers but I think it sucks. I know I will take a lot of heat from the old "tough guys" on here but I don't care.

No one called you clueless. You were the one who used the word and your use of the word was being questioned. Now you are offended by the word? Don't be so sensitive.
 
No one called you clueless. You were the one who used the word and your use of the word was being questioned. Now you are offended by the word? Don't be so sensitive.
No Andy I did call him clueless. You just missed that. Not sure if "clueless" is the heinous name to which hoodoo is refering but if it is then either he needs to sack up or I need sensitivity training. Oh well. Have good day.
 
Last edited:
No Andy I did call him clueless. You just missed that. Not sure if "clueless" is the heinous name to which hoodoo is refering but if it is then either he needs to sack up or I need sensitivity training. Oh well. Have good day.
Ah, OK. I assumed he was referring to Mathboy asking about his use of the word. I would say that if he is sensitive about others using the word to describe him, he shouldn't use the word to describe others. But then, I'm apparently one of those "old guys" who grew up without a safe space to run to when a "tough guy" said something on the internet that I didn't like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dakota Girl
Ah, OK. I assumed he was referring to Mathboy asking about his use of the word. I would say that if he is sensitive about others using the word to describe him, he shouldn't use the word to describe others. But then, I'm apparently one of those "old guys" who grew up without a safe space to run to when a "tough guy" said something on the internet that I didn't like.
I think BF35 was the first to use the word "clueless" in this thread, so I do have some problem with his drama. He quickly resorted to name calling, so maybe he can put a hold on his pretend outrage, eh? Now, in his defense, his posts were mixed into posts from several real trolls that often come in at these times, like ZZ and that Illuminati twit. Sometimes in response to these other morons, a post of differing opinion, such as his, gets swept into the troll assault/response.

BF35 is certainly welcome to his own opinion, and if he thinks a zone defense 2-3 or 1-3-1 or what ever is used to stop a hot 3-pt shooting team, well that is his special privilege. However, I would suggest that switching man-to-man is a far better way to push shooters off the 3-pt line. That UM guy was 6' 10" tall that was hitting those shoots. Who is going to guard him? Sometimes, kids just hit shots on their court, during senior night, and they can't be stopped. It is a wonderful part of the game when it's your kids. Not so much when the other guys do it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT