Very good post! Fran put it best. Play your young players early so you can figure out what you'll get from them. You know what your experienced players will do.
And that's why Fran is no longer in coaching.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Very good post! Fran put it best. Play your young players early so you can figure out what you'll get from them. You know what your experienced players will do.
Here's the reality. Its okay to have a down year after the run we've had. Your not going to be in the top 2 or 3 every year. So in that respect I'm not surprised or upset about what looks to be a mediocre year.
The problem is that I don't see another class like Edwards, Mathias, Hass and PJ followed up by Biggie and then Carsen coming in to rebuild.
Vince Edwards, Mathias, and Haas all contributed their freshman year. For that matter so did Davis, Hammons, and Carsen. Even Stephens averaged 8 points a game as a freshmen. The last time Purdue didn't have a freshman score at least 5 points a game was 2010-2011 when Terone Johnson scored 4.9 points per game on the team with Moore and Johnson.
Haarms is the only freshman or sophomore scoring more than 6 points per game. Purdue only has one true freshman in the rotation and he is scoring 2 points per game and finally next years recruiting class isn't highly rated.
That's why I'm concerned.
And that's why Fran is no longer in coaching.
Not why at all.
To say that Painter cannot coach is ridiculous. A few games ago, they listed the numbrr of B1G COY awards. Painter has won 3 iirc. That was approximately 4-5th on the list all-time. You do not get thst by being incompetent.
Having said that, he has shortcomings. The primary one is closing on recruits and not being in 2nd place. The job of a staff is to shore up in areas where the boss is weaker. I place a lot of the problem there. Recruiting has suffered and we did not exploit the strong runs of recent years as they warranted.
No, Painter does not play young guys. In the first game of the season against Fairfield, Eifert played 28 minutes. Why? You know what Eifert will give you against the top teams. A good coach who realizes the limitations of his team gives most of those minutes to someone else. Give 18 of those 28 minutes to Wheeler, Hunter, or Williams, and maybe they would be producing now. It’s unfair to thrust Wheeler, Hunter, or Williams into games against Michigan and other top teams and expect them to not look lost.THAT'S THE SCARY THING
regardless of how you feel about painter, one thing you can't accuse him of is being scared to play freshman. He's always played young guys, throughout his tenure. Only way to read this is these guys just aren't good enough to see minutes. As bad as this team looks, for this to be true, well it spells some ugly times in the near future.
And probably hates losing the first game in the tourney with those great recruits every year like Shaka has for 5 years in row. Oh wait, maybe not.He probably also hates getting out-recruited by Shaka too...
Actually, it's the boss's job to build a diverse staff that fills any fundamental skill gaps. He apparently hasnt done that in recruiting. We're probably saying the same thing for the most part. But Painter is responsible, not his staff.
What are these things that you're talking about? This team would be far better if Painter played Wheeler and Hunter significantly more early on in the season. It's too late now to get them up to speed. You know what you're getting from guys like Eifert.....0's on the stat line
Nope, I’m not surprised by this loss do no need to rub it in. I’m just enjoying the melt down.