And programs line that usually are found to be cheating or turning a blind eye to some horrific things...see Ole Miss and their 13 Level 1 infractions and Baylor. I'd rather do things the right way at Purdue.
Speaking only about recruiting:
Ok, so you will agree that a couple of schools came out of nowhere and maybe cheated and broke the NCAA recruiting rules. the list is long of teams that have violated NCAA rules And it includes Purdue's name in both mens' and womens' sports. Purdue is no better or worse than the vast majority of other major schools. the other schools just receive more publicity.
Mississippi violated a bunch of recruiting rules. But in so doing, it led to wins and continued success. They probably felt the end justified the means.
Admittedly, teams have lost Bowl bids and basketball tourney appearances, and scholarship limitations. They essentially sacrificed one year for future success.
a tough question and I'm not sure what my answer would be. Given a choice of doing it the right way and going 1-11 . 2-10. 3-9. and 2-10 or going 8-4, 10-2, 12-0, 8-4 and being forced to vacate the wins from one of those 4 seasons, which route would you choose? I know the answer the majority of posters here would say. But I'm not sure the majority of fans, students and alum would feel the same way. I say this because I once worked at Auburn, and their fans believe they have very high morals, and the NCAA rules are wrong, and they are justified in breaking them.
I believe Purdue can and should be able to have a recruiting class in the top 50 this year and/ or the very near future. And we should be able to have a better class than IU, U of I, and Minn every year. top 25? Can we do it without cheating?
MSU fans probably believe Purdue violated some type of NCAA rule, or at least an unwritten rule or ethical one by stealing Swanigan. I doubt any Purdue fan sees it that way. MSU fans probably feel Purdue cheats as much as Louisville does.
it's a matter of perspective.