On this day one year ago
- Thread starter FreedomWins
- Start date
What are you implying? I mean just say it.
Do you mean the circumstances of the shooting don't matter? Your points are more important? You're saying the racial side of this is more important than anything else? You're a freaking idiot, Jesus.
Law and Order…
Hey Republicans, that’s were they actually prosecute cases. Soemthing that pretty much all Democrat elected prosecutors have failed to do over the past two years. So AG Garland is just going with the flow.
Move along….nothing to see here
There you go again making BS statements. "pretty much all Democrat elected prosecutors"? Where do you get that from?
Nice deflection as usual.
It's more than $12....From $44 in Dec. 20th, to $71 yesterday. That is in the Silverado. it's 4.00 a gallon for the Vette.
Sort of like…all/most of the people at the Capitol were insurrectionists carrying “weapons”
1,300 times is way too low...way too low. It also confirmed and removed any potential hope that a citizen had the same protection and interest as royalty which was about as clear as could be made. What Washington strived for in refusing to be the king and in believing in the common man to sometimes break away from drudges of the farm and serve in public before returing back into society for another to serve his time is long gone.Or this
BLM riots caused 1,300 times as much damage as Jan. 6 violence: Analysis * WorldNetDaily * by Bob Unruh
An analysis by Real Clear Investigations reveals that the BLM and Antifa related riots across all of America in 2020 caused 1,300 times as much damage as the violence at the U.S. Capitol a year ago.www.wnd.com
Stop avoiding the question. You say stuff out of your ass and then you want to deflect AGAIN.
So now you can Tell me about the Democratic prosecutors AND the claims that all/most of the people at the Capital were carrying weapons. That's BS too.
Actually I cut some off, because I thought no reason in going there at this time. It is all about control and there are people on both sides of the aisle that are comfy with the way things are and do not want it disturbed. Trump obviously was a threat to them. Few people could stand the public hate and have the money to be on their own and so why else do people hate him? Sure he had tweets that some thought were mean and his life was not that of a saint, but look at the option. His policies were generally a blessing to many even if not of royalty. Look at the huge damage the chinese virus has caused, not just in whatever teh real number of lives lost is, but the financial destruction as well.
None of that considers the even larger damage due to the election resulting from the virus and yet..."WHO" do you hear talking about a need to eliminate that from happening again? Where are the ideas? Are they just waiting for someone to go first stating it as a goal to show some interest? Shouldn't that be getting some air time and then follow that up on investigations into the wealth these politicians grown while in the office? Just a few days ago Facebook banned children books with bios of Thomas Sowell, Ronald Reagan and Amy Coney Barrett. I just wish there were 90 % of the Facebook people that knew something about these three. The schools have successfully dumbed us down to the point that individual thought never happens. It wouldn't take a lot of understanding or awareness to see the attack on the first two amendments...which is also a priority numbering system.
Look at the suppression of information on the virus to anything and everything in potential conflict with those in high tech. Science not required to defend itself is propaganda. All of science should be able to sustain inquiry from all sources. Instead the word "science" is thrown around like stating a fact rather than a hypothesis based upon current understanding. Either side wants to throw out "science" as though that is a trump card, when in fact...let that science have scrutiny rather than trying to shut someone down. There is nothing wrong with inquiry from different angles
We’ll said. Is there any greater oxymoron term than political science
Why did they leave and who told them to do so? What was their intent? They were yelling "hang Pence", "where is Nancy". Were they just joking? I don't think an insurrection requires designated weapons, improvised ones will do.
I don’t know why they left or who told them to, but they did. Don’t you think all these people saying this could have done it if they really wanted to? I think so. There was little to no resistance by law enforcement to stop them. No politician was hurt or killed, no one occupied the capital overnight, or the next day, and there was no follow through. Doesn’t seem like the country was in much danger of an overthrow or insurrection to me. Peaceful protest no, but not nearly as violent as what went on in our cities during the prior year.
These media outlets promoting this insurrection agenda is truly dividing the country. Biden the unifier, is doing his best to keep us at each other’s throat.
Admittingly unfortunately I have nowhere near the historical understanding I should have. However, since the beginning of time, and in all the locations across the globe where a revolution, an overthrow of the government took place can you state a single time it was with improvised weapons in any location, at any time? If you can’t, is it possible that you have an emotional feeling absent supporting evidence in any of the thousands of years or thousands of miles covered?
Would you be so defensive if the mob actually had gotten a hold of Pence or pelosi. The scene that comes close is the French revolution.
Hypotheticals of your imagination is what you described and in no way did you refute that there has never been a revolution or government overthrown with improvised weapons. You just shifted from one imaginary thing to another. I'm old enough I didn't have safe places and so my mind can't begin to look at things the way you might.
That said there are others that feel just as you as well as others that think like me. I don't need to attempt to change your feelings.
So, it's OK because these idiots did not actually get a hold of Pence or Pelosi? This is supposed to be a country of law and order as embodied in the Constitution. Shi* like this is supposed to happen elsewhere. Beyond that, Trump violated his oath of office. Admittedly this thing gained a life of its own and Trump is culpable.
Good lord and you were a teacher. Thinking like this makes the schools scary.
Actually an award winning teacher. No, the schools are scary now. I haven't taught in over 10 years. Instead of getting personal why do tell me where you disagree and why?
Congrats to you then. Your hypothetical about what could of happened and didn’t happen. Had the protesters mob or whatever they were wanted to hurt or kill one of those people it would have occurred. It didn’t, and people say and think all kinds of things they never ever do. I’m sure you have as I certainly have. This was one of those times.
I’m way more concerned about the lawlessness going on in the cities with murders and blatant crime. Personally just tired of the media pushing this insurrection garbage as it’s not nearly as big an issue as these murders and crime.
My understanding is Pence was hustled off to a safe place. The mob appeared to have the intent. What happens if Trump runs in 24 and doesn't win? I am concerned about all of it. I have posted here many times about the rampant crime in the cities. It is not surprising. The law is not enforced especially in places like Cali. Criminals take notice and act accordingly. They do a risk benefit analysis just like any company or investor.
You have much more to fear from terrorists organizations like BLM/Antifa than a bunch of people trespassing on the capital.
I'm certainly not confused about law and order. I responded to a post stating that all those legal American that were trespassing should bear the brunt of the law, but it should not be as severe as those millions of illegals that trespass daily. I assume then that you too agree about the law for all the illegals. Is that a correct assumption? Then we can go to the lack of law exhibited for months and months in many cities, which I assume you too were against the dems fanning the flames. Is that a correct assumption? Supporting Law & order implied in your posts suggests you never agreed with the democrats making the police the enemy. Is that a correct assumption? I must also then assume, you were in disagreements with defunding the police that the democrats wanted. Is that another correct assumption? If so, then you can't be a supporter of the democrats or against Trump as that would be one major schizophrenic take. I really don't think it is a good look to support democrats on law and order, but that is just me.
Now, I'm guessing you finally came to realize how emotionally immature it was to talk about improvised weapons along with this two year French Revolution and so it should cause reflections into potential other imaginary hypothetical emotional outbursts and to prevent them before they happen, but I know this is not an overnight thing and will take time which takes me to Trump being culpable which has already been proven that he was not.
Still, in trying to meet your needs I'll approach this as many of us were approached years ago in our childhood about blaming others. I assume you were taught to not deflect as well...unless you are young enough that it was not in fashion. Many old enough with some emotional maturity remember sayings from parents or teachers when someone did something (borrowed from Omar-democrats) that they shouldn't and tried to "blame-shift" (Blame-shifting is when a person does something wrong or inappropriate, and then dumps the blame on someone else to avoid taking responsibility for their own behavior. Every day and in every way a person has a choice and that choice is theirs not one made by someone else.
None of this I enjoyed writing for a variety of reasons
What if Trump does run and wins? Trump, with a GOP house and senate with four years and no retribution, no phony impeachment trials would be a wonderful opportunity to set the courts for two lifetimes. And truly make America great again.
Polarizing figure for sure, It is too bad he can't control the bad side and let his policy speak for him and shut his mouth
What would you say Harris and Biden were doing by calling Trump an illegitimate president?? They had ZERO PROOF TO BACK IT UP! Step up and defend your president and VP, tough guy. Like the rat you are, you scattered when those videos of them saying that were posted… hypocrite bitch
Where to start? First of all you spent a great deal of time talking about Democrats and the crime plagueing cities. The topic of the thread is January 6. What you are doing is called deflecting. It makes for long, ineffective threads. Try to stay on topic.I'm certainly not confused about law and order. I responded to a post stating that all those legal American that were trespassing should bear the brunt of the law, but it should not be as severe as those millions of illegals that trespass daily. I assume then that you too agree about the law for all the illegals. Is that a correct assumption? Then we can go to the lack of law exhibited for months and months in many cities, which I assume you too were against the dems fanning the flames. Is that a correct assumption? Supporting Law & order implied in your posts suggests you never agreed with the democrats making the police the enemy. Is that a correct assumption? I must also then assume, you were in disagreements with defunding the police that the democrats wanted. Is that another correct assumption? If so, then you can't be a supporter of the democrats or against Trump as that would be one major schizophrenic take. I really don't think it is a good look to support democrats on law and order, but that is just me.
Now, I'm guessing you finally came to realize how emotionally immature it was to talk about improvised weapons along with this two year French Revolution and so it should cause reflections into potential other imaginary hypothetical emotional outbursts and to prevent them before they happen, but I know this is not an overnight thing and will take time which takes me to Trump being culpable which has already been proven that he was not.
Still, in trying to meet your needs I'll approach this as many of us were approached years ago in our childhood about blaming others. I assume you were taught to not deflect as well...unless you are young enough that it was not in fashion. Many old enough with some emotional maturity remember sayings from parents or teachers when someone did something (borrowed from Omar-democrats) that they shouldn't and tried to "blame-shift" (Blame-shifting is when a person does something wrong or inappropriate, and then dumps the blame on someone else to avoid taking responsibility for their own behavior. Every day and in every way a person has a choice and that choice is theirs not one made by someone else.
None of this I enjoyed writing for a variety of reasons
The events of Jan. 6 took on a life of its own. Fortunately no member of Congress nor Pence were injured or killed. Probably more a function of luck than anything else. It was a very dangerous incident without precedent and cannot be allowed to occur again. Trump bears much of the blame.
Do try to remember you are talking to another adult, save your approach for your kids or grandkids.
snip...snip...By the way: Did you know that more people refused to accept the results of the 2016 election than the 2020 election? It’s true, according to the Washington Examiner’s Byron York, who writes that while 58% of Republicans today say Biden wasn’t legitimately elected, 67% of Democrats said the same thing about Trump back in 2017.
Byron York’s Daily Memo: Declining faith in democracy? How did that happen? - Washington Examiner
Welcome to Byron York's Daily Memo newsletter.Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here to receive the newsletter.DECLINING FAITH IN DEMOCRACY? HOW DID THAT HAPPEN? For the last year, we've seen one article after another, and one cable TV segment after another, telling us that American...
www.washingtonexaminer.com
it was about law and order and yes this whole emotional, imaginary, outburst is about as puerile as possible. You went after trump and originally tried to say he caused it and then thought better by saying " Trump bears much of the blame." which again ignores the reality of deflection from those that tresspassed and Trump who didn't. You have dropped the imaginary French Revolution as well as the improvised weapons to overthrow. Good for you to see how childish that was. I have no idea who you are...whether an XY or and XX and at what mental maturity you have or some other imaginary thing, but when the comments are rather childish perhaps the Freudian part of the inner self wrote that which apparently you took to understand, but this whole phucking thing about the country being overthrown and such plays to mental midgets, and so it is really hard to imagine a mature mind thinking that people would overthrow the "Republic" with imaginary weapons. It really is and I tried by asking you to take a historical perspective outlook into reality in this area and yet, that never phased you. How mentally mature should I take someone that is so gullible? FWIW, I'm sorry if I hurt your feelings. I tried very hard not to do that.
you're just like Trump. Saying mean things even if they are true.
It is just hard to think you can have a sincere discussion about january 6 being an overthrow and such. It just boggles my mind that anyone can swallow that and blame Trump for the riots. Particular with the obvious not discussing the events much worse that went on for months. Hell, they should have cleaned it up years ago in "occupy wallstreet". I have no desire to be mean, but truth in context outweighs those desires. How anyone could begin to think Jan 6 is a threat and not publically post about real threats like artwork from Hunter and the attack on teh 1st and 2nd tells all that needs understood and I certainly don't have to stop there. Russia had useful idiots and the dems have theirs as James Carvalle stated. "This entire 'presidency' is like being tied to a chair and watching a toddler play with a loaded pistol."
First of, remember this is an anonymous message board. Given that, you cannot hurt my feeling simply because I don't and never will know you. My wife, kids etc. may, you are not capable of that that.
No Trump did not physically trespass on Capitol grounds. He simply inspired it. Did he not ask Pence to overturn the election results? Do you think that he has ever even glanced at the Constitution? Why exactly were the trespassers yelling for Pence? Was he not Trump's right hand man? It was a very dangerous incident.
As far as your rants about immaturity and gullibility goes, here is a suggestion. Watch Fox, CNN and MSNBC. Get varying takes and perspectives and then draw your own conclusion. Ours is not a maturity issue, we simply disagree.
what is up is now down, what is down is now up. Head spinning crap going on in our government. For me I did not notice much or was uninterested until Obama cam along. I watched every video I could get my hands on of Jan 6th and thought this is a nothingburrger. I underestimated the liberals' once again. At some point there will be push back and it won't look anything like what happened on Jan 6th. It will be real next time.
Glad your feelings were not hurt. However, to raise the event to the significance sought by the dems and to your fear does require a lot of touchy, feely emotional buy in because the mature mind knows there never was an overthrow threat. That was theater to their emotional voters or democrats in general and still theater because that is how the dems arouse their emotional base. Meanwhile real important things are going on much more a threat to this country and crickets. Played like pawns...yes, we disagree
Where is Susan Rice these days?
Also, if Mike Pence would have walked out into the rotunda and started to yell at people to sit down, my guess they would have. real scary people.
Dems are trying to paint allllll Republicans as enemies of the state with this dramatic theater
