ADVERTISEMENT

OMG!!!! How can't you get that call right?

Big Ten will probably come out tomorrow and apologize for getting the call wrong...little late
 
I think it should have been a foul on Haas.............I would have at least been used to that call
 
  • Like
Reactions: mathboy
I don't know if the refs saw every TV angle but Klines pinky may have been on the ball. It certainly wasn't "clear".
Purdue didn't lose the game because of that call, and Iowa had some that didn't go their way too.
However, there is no way Cline's "pinky" would have poked the ball with that speed and trajectory out of bounds. Cook hit it. The refs just didn't have the balls to over turn it since there was not a perfect camera angle.
 
Purdue didn't lose the game because of that call, and Iowa had some that didn't go their way too.
However, there is no way Cline's "pinky" would have poked the ball with that speed and trajectory out of bounds. Cook hit it. The refs just didn't have the balls to over turn it since there was not a perfect camera angle.
I guess the refs never took a basic physics class in their life. Common sense should have prevailed there. If you can't get that replay review right, you shouldn't be officiating these games. Borowski is a moron and the others had no balls to overrule him since he's the jackass veteran. How could they honestly not believe that ball was off Cook?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zaphod_B
I guess the refs never took a basic physics class in their life. Common sense should have prevailed there. If you can't get that replay review right, you shouldn't be officiating these games. Borowski is a moron and the others had no balls to overrule him since he's the jackass veteran. How could they honestly not believe that ball was off Cook?
They need to adopt the MLB/NHL policy where reviews are made off site.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PUQBMan.
They need to adopt the MLB/NHL policy where reviews are made off site.
Absolutely...as failing to do so, their is confirmation bias that plays a part in the review as a guy goes to the monitor believing that they got the call right and not looking to overturn it...only way they will is if there is clear evidence, and even in those cases, they still are reluctant (as was the case last night).

It was a bad call...compounded by a failure to overturn it...but it was yet another crew that was anything but stellar, so neither comes as a big surprise of any sort.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zaphod_B
Absolutely...as failing to do so, their is confirmation bias that plays a part in the review as a guy goes to the monitor believing that they got the call right and not looking to overturn it...only way they will is if there is clear evidence, and even in those cases, they still are reluctant (as was the case last night).

It was a bad call...compounded by a failure to overturn it...but it was yet another crew that was anything but stellar, so neither comes as a big surprise of any sort.
I truly try and avoid calling out refs, but I have found myself doing it more and more this season because of the sheer inconsistency in how they call games.

That said, that debacle last night was something else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zaphod_B
I truly try and avoid calling out refs, but I have found myself doing it more and more this season because of the sheer inconsistency in how they call games.

That said, that debacle last night was something else.

Fran and Putin are really tight. Who knew?

Clearly, the Russians hacked the replay monitor. There is no other plausible explanation.

Oh wait, maybe it is BO FREAKIN BOROSKI. Does anyone know Purdue's all-time record with him reffing our games? I has to be .500 or less.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Inspector100
I thought Bo got fired for some kind of shadiness (beyond screwing up games with his incompetence).
 
I thought Bo got fired for some kind of shadiness (beyond screwing up games with his incompetence).
He did not get fired, though he was involved in a scandal when he illegally accessed his own future game assignments (for what purpose you can guess, mine is point shaving). I've always believed he was a point shaver and he is consistently in the lower level of performance (sometimes bottom 10) by the ncaa's own metrics.
 
Probably no comfort here, but Carsen Edwards did make a crucial late shot @OSU after the shot clock had expired.

I don't think there was anything anti-Purdue about last night's call --- though I can buy what someone said above, that the officials might have been hesitant to overturn that significant a call at that point in the game against the home crowd unless it was absolutely obvious.
 
Fran and Putin are really tight. Who knew?

Clearly, the Russians hacked the replay monitor. There is no other plausible explanation.

Oh wait, maybe it is BO FREAKIN BOROSKI. Does anyone know Purdue's all-time record with him reffing our games? I has to be .500 or less.
the record is 8-7, but 0-3 the last three games. Keep in mind our overall winning percentage is much higher so he is certainly way below the norm.
 
the record is 8-7, but 0-3 the last three games. Keep in mind our overall winning percentage is much higher so he is certainly way below the norm.
This game and the Villanova debacle a few years ago when Boroski called a horseshit foul by the bench against DJ Byrd, sending Ryan Arcidiacono to the foul line. It ended up totally changing the outcome of the game.
 
They could have called a jump ball but chose not to do it.

Why would they call a jump ball? I thought it could/should have been overturned, but what does the jump ball call accomplish? If you see enough to overturn, then overturn it. If you don't, the call on the floor should stand.
 
Play should have never happened at all since Jok was out of bounds on the baseline with 40.2 seconds left. Complete Bull Shit !!!! A buddy texted me the photo of it, but I cannot get it to copy into this thread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zaphod_B
Bo does a ridiculous percentage of Iowa games. It's really annoying, particularly because he hates Fran. He ejected Fran and demanded a police escort when iowa played at northern iowa in 2011. Iowa stopped played there as an indirect result.
 
Purdue didn't lose the game because of that call, and Iowa had some that didn't go their way too.
However, there is no way Cline's "pinky" would have poked the ball with that speed and trajectory out of bounds. Cook hit it. The refs just didn't have the balls to over turn it since there was not a perfect camera angle.

Of course cook hit it, but that doesn't mean he was the last to touch it.
 
They could have called a jump ball but chose not to do it.
Bingo! I believe that is still in the rule book when officials can't agree on what occurred. I guess all 3 were in agreement but, a jump ball made more sense to me. Don't know then if goes to the arrow or an actual jump. That said, that call is NOT what beat us.
 
I'm still trying to understand how you can't throw a pass to you self but you can throw up an airball, move, catch it yourself without it being touched by any other player and shoot again without it being a travel call.
 
I'm still trying to understand how you can't throw a pass to you self but you can throw up an airball, move, catch it yourself without it being touched by any other player and shoot again without it being a travel call.
This baffled me more than the obvious blown OB call. I think Dakota would be awesome at this move. Pull up at foul line pump fake shot to yourself and drive for the layup.
 
I'm still trying to understand how you can't throw a pass to you self but you can throw up an airball, move, catch it yourself without it being touched by any other player and shoot again without it being a travel call.
The broadcasters said Borowski came over during the following break and told them something to the effect that he's only made that call one other time in his career.. I was like no crap, because that sort of thing is usually called a travel!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Inspector100
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT