At home. Lost on the road and neutral. What is your point? Clemson is a good team and a hard matchupWe beat Michigan by 30 who started 7 ft and 7’1
At home. Lost on the road and neutral. What is your point? Clemson is a good team and a hard matchupWe beat Michigan by 30 who started 7 ft and 7’1
I think he addressed the “don’t see how we match up” point.At home. Lost on the road and neutral. What is your point? Clemson is a good team and a hard matchup
I addressed the height matchup. Clemson has also lost their glue guy for the season to a broken hand.At home. Lost on the road and neutral. What is your point? Clemson is a good team and a hard matchup
Agree. If Purdue and Clemson both make it to the second round it would be a tough game and Clemson could very well win, but it seems crazy to say that we ‘can’t’ match up.I addressed the height matchup. Clemson has also lost their glue guy for the season to a broken hand.
And their coach is going to IU…..that team is ripe for a mental lapse.I addressed the height matchup. Clemson has also lost their glue guy for the season to a broken hand.
They still need to beat Mcneese first!And their coach is going to IU…..that team is ripe for a mental lapse.
McNeese was the popular upset pick last year and they laid an egg.They still need to beat Mcneese first!
Didn’t you hear, beef? Winner of Mcneese Clemson, gets the IU job! Clemson will prob lose on purpose then.McNeese was the popular upset pick last year and they laid an egg.
Not holding my breath.
I know no one wants to call it because it's hard to know which version of this team is going to show up, but log your outlook anyway and feel free to post your rationale. I think this team has a solid chance to make to Indy and from there anything can happen if they're shooting well, but if I were betting I just wouldn't have enough faith on the good version of this team showing up. I have them down for a second round (field of 32) loss to Clemson or McNeese.
Easy money to be made in driving clicks by calling for upsets. Who knows, maybe they're right. The upside for the talking heads is that there's zero impact on them if they're wrong.![]()
Analyst Seth Davis Makes Bold High Point-Purdue Prediction in NCAA Tournament
CBS college basketball analyst Seth Davis is already picking No. 13 High Point to upset No. 4 Purdue in the first round of the 2025 NCAA Basketball Tournament.www.si.com
Paid to talk about college hoops.......I missed my calling!!Easy money to be made in driving clicks by calling for upsets. Who knows, maybe they're right. The upside for the talking heads is that there's zero impact on them if they're wrong.
It's time for Painter to prove he's a Hall Of Fame coach. I think he's shaky in that regard especially in NCAA first round upsets.I think we lose in first round or go to final 4.
Hear me out.....
We all know this team is in a funk. Come out lackadaisical and this year's Cinderella will send us home. Unfortunately it can happen...
.
Get past the first game and you have a team with Final 4 experience, an AA point gaurd, HOF coach, an All B1G post player, and shooters everywhere playing with house money. This fan base is frustrated. Get to Sweet 16 in Indy and atmosphere will be ELECTRIC. We are all ready to get on the train, and if the boys get to Indy Purdue fans will show out and be wild.
It could happen?
Agree. A first-round loss would be disappointing but anything beyond that is house money for this team. Houston is a tough matchup, this Purdue team would have to have a great shooting night to keep it close.I think they get by High Point. Purdue vs Clemson could be. Unless Houston gets upset, I am not sure Purdue has it to upset Houston.
Any monkey with a computer can make the High Point over Purdue pick. Someone broke down the 10-15 upset options by their ability to beat better teams….High Point would be the outlier if they did it.Easy money to be made in driving clicks by calling for upsets. Who knows, maybe they're right. The upside for the talking heads is that there's zero impact on them if they're wrong.
Except that it wouldn't be technically. Colorado St -2.5. It's actually gone up.Any monkey with a computer can make the High Point over Purdue pick. Someone broke down the 10-15 upset options by their ability to beat better teams….High Point would be the outlier if they did it.
Colorado State is a better upset pick.
I've been watching that line. Do you remember a 12 being favored over the 5 prior to this?Except that it wouldn't be technically. Colorado St -2.5. It's actually gone up.
Houston has to beat Gonzaga first!Agree. A first-round loss would be disappointing but anything beyond that is house money for this team. Houston is a tough matchup, this Purdue team would have to have a great shooting night to keep it close.
He already is a hall of fame coach lmaoIt's time for Painter to prove he's a Hall Of Fame coach. I think he's shaky in that regard especially in NCAA first round upsets.
Any monkey with a computer can make the High Point over Purdue pick. Someone broke down the 10-15 upset options by their ability to beat better teams….High Point would be the outlier if they did it.
Colorado State is a better upset pick.
I really don't know what to make of Gonzaga. They can beat just about anyone and can lose to Santa Clara and Oregon State as well.Houston has to beat Gonzaga first!
I'm sure it's happened but don't know any specifics.I've been watching that line. Do you remember a 12 being favored over the 5 prior to this?
I'm sure it's happened but don't know any specifics.
E8 losing to Tennessee. We avoid Houston because they catch a hot Gonzaga team.
Is he surefire for the HOF if he were to retire tomorrow? Naismith or College Basketball HOF?He already is a hall of fame coach lmao
YesIs he surefire for the HOF if he were to retire tomorrow? Naismith or College Basketball HOF?
Who would his comp be on the Naismith list with fewer than 500 wins, no NC's, and one national coach of the year award? I think it would be unprecedented but am honestly not certain.
Oh you said now…haha ok fine didn’t read it all the way haha. I guess not yet then.Who would his comp be on the Naismith list with fewer than 500 wins, no NC's, and one national coach of the year award? I think it would be unprecedented but am honestly not certain.