At home. Lost on the road and neutral. What is your point? Clemson is a good team and a hard matchupWe beat Michigan by 30 who started 7 ft and 7’1
At home. Lost on the road and neutral. What is your point? Clemson is a good team and a hard matchupWe beat Michigan by 30 who started 7 ft and 7’1
I think he addressed the “don’t see how we match up” point.At home. Lost on the road and neutral. What is your point? Clemson is a good team and a hard matchup
I addressed the height matchup. Clemson has also lost their glue guy for the season to a broken hand.At home. Lost on the road and neutral. What is your point? Clemson is a good team and a hard matchup
Agree. If Purdue and Clemson both make it to the second round it would be a tough game and Clemson could very well win, but it seems crazy to say that we ‘can’t’ match up.I addressed the height matchup. Clemson has also lost their glue guy for the season to a broken hand.
And their coach is going to IU…..that team is ripe for a mental lapse.I addressed the height matchup. Clemson has also lost their glue guy for the season to a broken hand.
They still need to beat Mcneese first!And their coach is going to IU…..that team is ripe for a mental lapse.
McNeese was the popular upset pick last year and they laid an egg.They still need to beat Mcneese first!
Didn’t you hear, beef? Winner of Mcneese Clemson, gets the IU job! Clemson will prob lose on purpose then.McNeese was the popular upset pick last year and they laid an egg.
Not holding my breath.
I know no one wants to call it because it's hard to know which version of this team is going to show up, but log your outlook anyway and feel free to post your rationale. I think this team has a solid chance to make to Indy and from there anything can happen if they're shooting well, but if I were betting I just wouldn't have enough faith on the good version of this team showing up. I have them down for a second round (field of 32) loss to Clemson or McNeese.
Easy money to be made in driving clicks by calling for upsets. Who knows, maybe they're right. The upside for the talking heads is that there's zero impact on them if they're wrong.![]()
Analyst Seth Davis Makes Bold High Point-Purdue Prediction in NCAA Tournament
CBS college basketball analyst Seth Davis is already picking No. 13 High Point to upset No. 4 Purdue in the first round of the 2025 NCAA Basketball Tournament.www.si.com
Paid to talk about college hoops.......I missed my calling!!Easy money to be made in driving clicks by calling for upsets. Who knows, maybe they're right. The upside for the talking heads is that there's zero impact on them if they're wrong.