Bad things happen on every presidents' watch. No one has argued to the contrary.
It would be convenient, maybe even rational, to make attempts to cherry pick specific incidents to support a thoughtful disagreement against a given policy of Obama. However, the reality is that a special segment of our populace has worked tirelessly to thwart every single move Obama has tried to make since Jan 20, 2009. For those people, everything he does is deemed "criminal", "un american", and, in your words "disgusting". This group even spent time and money trying to argue the birther position, and now has elected a leading "birther" as the GOP presidential nominee.
Classic liberal hypocrisy- stereotyping an entire group of people based on 1 political view. All the while doing nothing to refute my point: that only Obama would have an ego so big, and a heart so cold, as to hammer grieving widows and fatherless children with his ideological drivel about school funding, mental health funding, drug rehab funding, etc etc. (Especially rich considering he and his band of bozos blew thru a trillion dollar "stimulus".)
Ridiculous for you to try to co opt the words stereotyping and hypocrisy, when many of the "criminal" and "egotistical" policies/opinions of Obama were center-right ideas that only became evil in the eyes of tea bags when they were adopted by Obama. You can try to make it about his ego to shade your blind hatred, but we all know the most likely motivation. I'll bet you never even thought about calling a president "disrespectful" before. Not because there weren't disagreements, but calling the President out for disobedience and disrespect, it just feels easier with Obama... Mysterious, right?
When logic fails, go with vague, sweeping generalizations. You obviously cannot defend Obama's callous and stomach-turning grandstanding in Dallas, or his absurd diatribe after Orlando, so you resort to the same old tired, race-baiting tactics. Coming from the party of Jefferson Davis, Jim Crow, George Wallace and segregation, no less.
LOL - yeah Obama's next step onto the "middle ground" will be his first.
If you read George Orwell's "1984", and I did, it's doublethink, one word, not "...double speak...". The impetus for doublethink is Big Brother aka Big Government.
lol yes because adopting a republican GOVs healthcare plan isn't "middle ground." At least we have one trick, you've got nothing.
The only things you've been able to find to support your preferred narrative are two days old or from far right bloggers. Even this link contains updated information from today that says he was a mass shooter playing a game on Facebook where he lured kids to MCDonalds on the promise of free food, not that he was a German-born terrorist of Iranian descent. Give it up. You're just continuing to embarrass yourself, even if you're too ignorant and sheltered to recognize that fact.
Gr8, unless the shooter was a neo-Nazi skinhead waving the flag of the Third Reich and shouting "Do you want fries with that?" as he shot kids in the guts and head at McDonalds, you will never accept that a moslem Iranian loser getting no good puuntang and shouting "Allahu Akbar" was committing jihad.
Alright, calm down, it's pill time, you can readdress and sort this post out later.
I was driving while typing and didn't look it up specifically but that is semantics and irrelevant to the larger points but hey are closely related concepts and equally applicable and my panties were in a wad and kinda poopy and stinky and my Depends was doing double duty. Oh Jeepers, I just did a triple duty in my Depends.
did you just have a stroke? Do we need to call someone?
That's just it. I don't believe he was yelling "Allahu Akbar" as multiple witnesses and video evidence, along with police reports on motivation have no indication of jihadist links. You've latched on to what one lady thought she heard yet are not paying any attention to the other mountains of evidence to the contrary. I'm going with what the preponderance of the evidence suggests, nothing more. Sorry that doesn't fit your preferred narrative.
Moving on to the next jihad attacks, we have a bomber and a machete attack in Baveria, both Syrian moslems.
Wow - epic comeback fail, even by your standards. 99% of Republicans outside of MA were against Romneycare. Obama, Pelosi and Reid rammed thru ObamaCare with no GOP votes. In fact, the GOP was locked out of all the committee hearings.
Ah, so you gave up on this one, then? Admit you were wrong AGAIN? Change your behavior?
I can do pathway to citizenship- AFTER we secure the border. We have a President who refuses to enforce existing immigration laws, (which is pretty much his job description) - that's why the GOP won't move until the border wall is done.
I don't think the idea of free college education is "absurd." It may be something that never passes but it isn't generally speaking "absurd."
I think her plan is a lot less, so it would take a lot less push, but the reality is given the House (assuming she wins and wins the Senate) I'm going to assume literally nothing makes it through Congress regardless of what she proposes.
Yes - if she continues the "my way or the highway" tack taken by Obama, then not much will go thru.
But I mean the Munich shooter wasn't even a practicing Muslim, and may have actually converted from Islam anyway, but yeah, I'm sure Islam was his primary motivation despite the mounds of evidence to the contrary cuz you say so.
