Announcing tonight. Think we’re in good shape.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does anyone know the 40 time for Marcellus Moore?Its showing up on Rivals.
Welcome aboard Mr Moore.
Does anyone know the 40 time for Marcellus Moore?
4.35 on 247.Does anyone know the 40 time for Marcellus Moore?
3.90
I checked out some track highlights of him. Dude is flying past people. He's probably going to be in tje low 4.3s by the time he gets here. Everyone go long.
Moore is on the outside on the video. Can easily see why he has such a great offer list.
The "Plainfield Pulverizer"! Gotta love it.
Moore is on the outside on the video. Can easily see why he has such a great offer list.
Let’s just say he’s so fast that stopwatch operated is still pressing down on the stopwatch buttonby the time Moore crosses the finish line
If it’s just his size holding back his ranking, that’s pretty short sighted on the part of the so-called experts. Would Brandin Cooks, Antonio Brown, Julian Edelman, or Tyreek Hill be any better in their current roles if they were 6’5”? Probably would be worse due to loss of quickness and cutting ability. There are multiple, distinct receiver roles in a modern offense that the services don’t seem to value. You can’t have 5’9” receivers all over the field, but one or two in the slot with world class quickness can be deadly.Similar to Rondale and his ranking, this kid should be a 4 star, but it’s size that makes him a 3 star. As Rondale told recruiters who questioned his size, you can not teach speed. He is going to be fun to watch also in Brohm’s offense.
Let’s close out the WRs with Carr!
I completely agree with that. Just because a kid hits what you feel are the prototypical sizes needed to be successful at the next level, this is what we are giving you ratings wise, but unfortunately it happens.If it’s just his size holding back his ranking, that’s pretty short sighted on the part of the so-called experts. Would Brandin Cooks, Antonio Brown, Julian Edelman, or Tyreek Hill be any better in their current roles if they were 6’5”? Probably would be worse due to loss of quickness and cutting ability. There are multiple, distinct receiver roles in a modern offense that the services don’t seem to value. You can’t have 5’9” receivers all over the field, but one or two in the slot with world class quickness can be deadly.
I'm psyched we need moore Moore's.I completely agree with that. Just because a kid hits what you feel are the prototypical sizes needed to be successful at the next level, this is what we are giving you ratings wise, but unfortunately it happens.
Rivals had Rondale as the 100th best receiver in his class. The 2 "experts" that picked him that low basically admitted at the end of the season last year that they obviously underrated him big time. They talked about how they were not sure of how his size would play in the next level during the rating process, even with the speed. It might not be the same in this case with this kid, but from the videos I have seen with his blazing speed it seems to be similar to that same bias. With those big time offers, you would expect this kid is a four star.
Of course, Ricardo Allen was only a three star, and he even had a bigger offer list. I thought size was a factor for him in that rating if I remembering right. It is obviously a subjective system they use to rate recruits.
It isn’t. I asked the 247 guys the same question. They said they question his commitment to football. Nothing bad, but said he loves trackIf it’s just his size holding back his ranking, that’s pretty short sighted on the part of the so-called experts. Would Brandin Cooks, Antonio Brown, Julian Edelman, or Tyreek Hill be any better in their current roles if they were 6’5”? Probably would be worse due to loss of quickness and cutting ability. There are multiple, distinct receiver roles in a modern offense that the services don’t seem to value. You can’t have 5’9” receivers all over the field, but one or two in the slot with world class quickness can be deadly.
They said he would be running track for Purdue too.It isn’t. I asked the 247 guys the same question. They said they question his commitment to football. Nothing bad, but said he loves track
Sheiit. Doubt itThey said he would be running track for Purdue too.
That might be the case, but I got this from the article below.Sheiit. Doubt it
Where did it say running back? It said backfield and wideout. Same thing Rondale doesThat might be the case, but I got this from the article below.
https://247sports.com/college/purdu...re-commits-to-Purdue-Boilermakers--133975978/
Where did it say running back? It said backfield and wideout. Same thing Rondale does
I said running track for Purdue too. I posted the link talking about that. I never said anything about running back.Where did it say running back? It said backfield and wideout. Same thing Rondale does
I wonder if his scholly is for track. If so, that would then give us one extra scholly against the football limits.I said running track for Purdue too. I posted the link talking about that. I never said anything about running back.
By NCAA rule the scholarship would have to be for football. If he were playing basketball and track the scholarship would have to be for basketball. There's a set heirarchy mandated by the NCAAI wonder if his scholly is for track. If so, that would then give us one extra scholly against the football limits.
It's amazing the great wrs purdue is getting. That position is going to be loaded with talent
By NCAA rule the scholarship would have to be for football. If he were playing basketball and track the scholarship would have to be fir basketball. There's a set heirarchy mandated by the NCAA
Football scholarship. It's a set heirarchy.What if a player plays b-ball and fball?
All your Moores are belong to us.