arc: While you are kind to give props to my previous posts, in my opinion, the reason I knew about, and you weren't aware of the Crean firing is
solely because I had far more interest and access to the facts of the Crean situation.
If you had the same info I did you would have reached the same conclusion.
As for your post above...Absolutely! The Peegs free board assorted-nut-collection flamed away at will back then. Every message board fan base has that element. Imagine that...turns out message board flamers were wrong! They very often are.
Let's move to 2017: Pascal's quote that you cited can be applied in (at least) two ways:
1. As a predictor for
the quality of coach IU will hire:
Pascal might say that IU's "event(s) that ha(ve) occurred" relates to the IU fan base's hiring expectations, versus the quality of the actual hire. For instance, if IU hires Alford (a real possibility, though I don't think it's the most likely) then a lot of Pascal's logic could hold. Alford has some Sampson ethics and some Crean coaching results on his resume. Pascal would then say that IUBB expected Donovan quality, but history repeated and we got another mixed bag of uncertainty.
But...
2. If Pascal's words are applied to
the expected performance of the next hire:
And the hire is Donovan, Sean Miller, or Bennett, (not saying that is going to happen, but it absolutely could) then Pascal would also look at the events and data surrounding their coaching history, and would probably equate their arrival to a far sunnier outlook for IU.
And not hypocrisy. Heck...it's not even hypocracy