IU sucks
- Thread starter Born Boiler
- Start date
Purdue was in his final 5. The guy on here said Reece didn’t even consider Purdue which is laughable.
22, I actually did some basic research on the coed question. You could do so as well but I suspect that you are lazy and just regurgitating nonsense fed to you.
One can go online and find pictures of this year's cheerleaders for Purdue and IU. I looked them up. I defy you to tell us that the IU cheerleaders are better looking than Purdue's. While this is admittedly a subjective judgment, I am rather confident that Purdue's would win a comparison vote of the genetal public.
Of course, the WSJ & USNWR data do put IU at a significant disadvantage as an academic institution as well.
So the "real" facts do demonstrate that IU sucks!
One can go online and find pictures of this year's cheerleaders for Purdue and IU. I looked them up. I defy you to tell us that the IU cheerleaders are better looking than Purdue's. While this is admittedly a subjective judgment, I am rather confident that Purdue's would win a comparison vote of the genetal public.
Of course, the WSJ & USNWR data do put IU at a significant disadvantage as an academic institution as well.
So the "real" facts do demonstrate that IU sucks!
Last edited:
Not quite sure why you think this is creepy. An assertion was made. I put said assertion to a test of accuracy. The accuracy was lacking. Putting theory to a test of data is how knowledge is confirmed and advances. That is otherwise called the Scientific Method, something that I was trained in.
An IU fan trying to diss Purdue academics, seriously? You guys are just lucky Nebraska joined the Big Ten, keeps you out of the basement.
I know it’s likely hard for you to comprehend but Purdue acquired Kaplan not the other way around. IU fans have zero room to talk smack to Purdue when it comes to academics.
Sucks you went to a lesser school than Purdue. My guess is you didn’t even go to IU.
Save your time on applying. McDonalds pays pretty well these days and it’d be a better fit for you.
Hmmm...whining? I thought I was just being factual when it comes to thoughts about non-con scheduling. But you certainly are entitled to your lame-a$$ opinion.
Even with your tougher division, Purdue had a tougher schedule than IU last year. I always laugh when I see IU fans claim Purdue went bowling because of their easier schedule last year. It was like 10 spots higher on the list than you guys.
Purdue went bowling because you won 6 games. IU had it's chance. SOS is irrelevant at this point.
Appreciate you letting me know what my intentions were....no whining. Read it again without your blinders on.
Oh, IU will play "their" schedule - no choice. But the original point was non-con scheduling strategy when you know you are playing OSU. Michigan, MSU, and Penn State every single year. That's all.
Cannot spell it out for you any more simple than this....
If you want to play a light preconference schedule because you fear the heavyweights in your conference schedule that is fine. But after scheduling a light preconference schedule, don't start bragging about being 3-0. And please do not claim that there isn't bragging over here about your start.
Well, then there's not switching, dipstick. Yeah, you have to play them. Every. Single. Year. That's all.
Just play.
Asking to switch looks like you're whining. Nobody gives a d@mn if you think your conference schedule is stronger or weaker. You play who you play. Cupcake your OOC, if feel the need. Nobody cares. Just play.
