ADVERTISEMENT

Is There More to the Khizr Khan Story than Meets the Eye?

CTP Khan was killed by moslems who went jihad. Exactly the type of people that Trump wants to keep out of the US.

Do you want to immigrate more moslems so that we can live on fear like those in Jordan and Syria and Iraq? And France?
 
Multichoice answer
Because:
A) Media is biased
B) Donald Trump has no sense and continued to stoke the fire

Take your choice, I know what I choose.

I choose All of the above, for sure.
Surely you don't actually believe that any news outlet are "fair and balanced". There are none! Zero! Zip! Nada!
I even read the AP app trying to find impartiality only to find it full of biased individual writers.
There used to be something called the Journalistic Code of Ethics.....ha! What a joke!

https://www.spj.org/pdf/ethicscode.pdf
 
Last edited:
CTP Khan was killed by moslems who went jihad. Exactly the type of people that Trump wants to keep out of the US.

Do you want to immigrate more moslems so that we can live on fear like those in Jordan and Syria and Iraq? And France?

You need to get help.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gr8indoorsman
The confounding factor in all of this is that CPT Humayun Khan was killed by a moslem jihad attack. He was killed by two of his own kind.
So if an African American Soldier gets killed by a black jihadist, does he get killed by his own kind too? Wait, I'm asking questions I already know the answer to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gr8indoorsman
Of all the crazy things you've posted; I think this is a new low.

His own kind? Would you say that about a German immigrant or Japanese American killed serving for US military n WWII? Would you say that about an Irish American tourist killed by an IRA bomb in the 1970's?

What happened to you to make you so fearful and hateful?
You missed the thread he started that GBI quickly pulled.
 
Except that Khan wasn't a jihadist... I doubt he would tell you they were "his kind", nor would his parents. Bigot.
The Khan family are moslem. The jihadists who killed CPT Khan were moslems.

The problem is Islam. It is a medieval cult and many of its followers believe they will be rewarded with an houri of 72 virgins in paradise if they kill some infidels. That is why CPT Khan died. That is why 3,000 people died on 9/11. That is why innocents died in Orlando and Paris and Nice and San Bernadino and Brussels and on and on and on.
 
The Khan family are moslem. The jihadists who killed CPT Khan were moslems.

The problem is Islam. It is a medieval cult and many of its followers believe they will be rewarded with an houri of 72 virgins in paradise if they kill some infidels. That is why CPT Khan died. That is why 3,000 people died on 9/11. That is why innocents died in Orlando and Paris and Nice and San Bernadino and Brussels and on and on and on.
Yeah, if we just got rid of "moslems" no one would die in wars and there would be no evil in the world. No mass shootings either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gr8indoorsman
The Khan family are moslem. The jihadists who killed CPT Khan were moslems.

The problem is Islam. It is a medieval cult and many of its followers believe they will be rewarded with an houri of 72 virgins in paradise if they kill some infidels. That is why CPT Khan died. That is why 3,000 people died on 9/11. That is why innocents died in Orlando and Paris and Nice and San Bernadino and Brussels and on and on and on.
The point you can't get through your bigoted mind is that not all Muslims are the same. If your son or daughter was murdered by another Christian, and I walked up to you and said, "The irony here is that your son or daughter was murdered by another Christian, huh?" you'd rightly punch me in the face. Your utter lack of empathy is astonishing.
 
As did I. Yeah, the one with the female version of the N-word.
No, Negress is the female version of Negro. That N-word stuff, that's the bigotry in your head. Let's see what Wikipedia says about "Negro":

Negro superseded colored as the most polite word for African Americans at a time when black was considered more offensive.[5] In Colonial America during the 1600s the term Negro was, according to one historian, also used to describe Native Americans[6] Marcus Garvey used the word in the names of black nationalist and pan-Africanist organizations such as theUniversal Negro Improvement Association (founded 1914), the Negro World (1918), the Negro Factories Corporation (1919), and the Declaration of the Rights of the Negro Peoples of the World (1920). W. E. B. Du Bois and Dr. Carter G. Woodson used it in the titles of their non-fiction books, The Negro (1915) and The Mis-Education of the Negro (1933) respectively. "Negro" was accepted as normal, both as exonym and endonym, until the late 1960s, after the later African-American Civil Rights Movement. One well-known example is the identification by Martin Luther King, Jr. of his own race as "Negro" in his famous "I Have a Dream" speech of 1963.

However, during the 1950s and 1960s, some black American leaders, notably Malcolm X, objected to the word Negro because they associated it with the long history of slavery, segregation, and discrimination that treated African Americans as second class citizens, or worse.[7] Malcolm X preferred Black to Negro, but also started using the term Afro-American after leaving the Nation of Islam.[8]

Since the late 1960s, various other terms have been more widespread in popular usage. These include black, Black African, Afro-American (in use from the late 1960s to 1990) and African American.[9] The word Negro fell out of favor by the early 1970s. However, many older African Americans initially found the term black more offensive than Negro.

The term Negro is still used in some historical contexts, such as the songs known as Negro spirituals, the Negro Leagues of sports in the early and mid-20th century, and organizations such as the United Negro College Fund.[10][11] The academic journal published by Howard University since 1932 still bears the title Journal of Negro Education, but others have changed: e.g. the Association for the Study of Negro Life and History (founded 1915) became the Association for the Study of Afro-American Life and History in 1973, and is now the Association for the Study of African American Life and History; its publication The Journal of Negro History becameThe Journal of African American History in 2001. Margo Jefferson titled her 2015 book Negroland: A Memoir to evoke growing up in the 1950s and 1960s in the African-American upper class.

The United States Census Bureau included Negro on the 2010 Census, alongside Black and African-American, because some older black Americans still self-identify with the term.[12][13][14] The U.S. Census now uses the grouping "Black, African-American, or Negro." Negro is used in efforts to include older African Americans who more closely associate with the term.[15]
 
I never said all moslems are the same. That's the witch hunt in your mind kicking into overdrive again.
You referred to CPT Khan and the jihadists who killed him as one in the same (your words: "his kind") when they probably couldn't be more different ideologically. So yeah, you definitely implied that (if not just outright saying it altogether) and I'm pretty sure you're literally the only person who has viewed this thread who thinks you didn't.
 
You referred to CPT Khan and the jihadists who killed him as one in the same (your words: "his kind") when they probably couldn't be more different ideologically. So yeah, you definitely implied that (if not just outright saying it altogether) and I'm pretty sure you're literally the only person who has viewed this thread who thinks you didn't.
Your witching stick seems to have gone into a spasm. I was very clearly talking about moslem CPT Khan being "the same" as the moslem jihadists who killed him. It would make no sense at all to call CPT Khan a jihadist. He obviously was not one.
 
You referred to CPT Khan and the jihadists who killed him as one in the same (your words: "his kind") when they probably couldn't be more different ideologically. So yeah, you definitely implied that (if not just outright saying it altogether) and I'm pretty sure you're literally the only person who has viewed this thread who thinks you didn't.
no, it wasn't implied, it was expressly stated.
 
Your witching stick seems to have gone into a spasm. I was very clearly talking about moslem CPT Khan being "the same" as the moslem jihadists who killed him. It would make no sense at all to call CPT Khan a jihadist. He obviously was not one.
The confounding factor in all of this is that CPT Humayun Khan was killed by a moslem jihad attack. He was killed by two of his own kind.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT