ADVERTISEMENT

Indiana v. Purdue Game Thread

didn't play smart at the end of the half - they were in foul trouble and we jacked up shots instead of going after bryant's 3rd. Lead would look better if we had gotten it
 
  • Like
Reactions: BoilerGal74
I don't have an issue with the 3's we took. They were all potential knockout punches and a couple were wide open. We want out shooters taking those shots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBG
Can't argue with Seth Greenberg.....outside of Indiana's two really good wins, the conference teams just didn't get enough done out of conference.
 
Typical iu come back; throw the ball around, couple lucky bounces, then throw up a 3. Clappy offense just like he clapped it out.
 
This is what it's become over in the IU chat room:

mironiki: Definitely bottom 20 in IQ, which hs been a recurrent theme in Clappy's reign

Paterade: it is not a required trait for weave and heave

TrumpTheHawkeyes: you guys think cody zeller had low iq?

TrumpTheHawkeyes: or only the blacks?

mironiki: Matthias almost doubled his average in the first half.

Grizz: Weave and heave is so true!

Enormous Nuts: Not racist. The 2013 team was smart for a crean team

IU Bud: I made it to halftime. If we took care of the ball and read the scouting report, we would be up at half

Enormous Nuts: Still underachieved

iu2win: I agree Bud. 1/2 the turnovers and IU is leading this thing.

Vanhoosier: I'll take an average athletic, smart white kid over these high flyers any day... most of these kids never had to use their brain because they were so much bigger and better in high school. at this level, they don't know or want to make the effort...

Enormous Nuts: Good athletes can be taught and coached

Vanhoosier: give me a tom coverdale over any of the current guards.
 
Run them down the side of the lane but stop trying to swat the ball. They are out of control and will miss a bunch of these drives.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT