Man, that was a duesie! It got to a point where I kept replying, "If the team is competitive, I will come out to watch it."Believe they are busy assembling their next survey on the south end zone project....
Everyone over there is eerily quiet, or so it seems.
Looks like they've put that on the back burner for the $60M Mollenkopf expansion thingy.Believe they are busy assembling their next survey on the south end zone project....
Looks like they've put that on the back burner for the $60M Mollenkopf expansion thingy.
Honest question - Am I supposed to seriously believe (as has been suggested), our athletic department will retain Hazell due to his $6M+ buyout being too steep, all the while, the same athletic department can drop $60M+ on a new building? I'm not saying the new building is unneccessary (well, it is unneccessary, but not if we're going to actually try and win in this "arms race" that is college football), but that is not an insignificant sum. Surely, if we lose out, Hazell is gone, right? If not, would all this imply it is because Burke has actual faith in his ability to turn this around?
Looks like they've put that on the back burner for the $60M Mollenkopf expansion thingy.
Honest question - Am I supposed to seriously believe (as has been suggested), our athletic department will retain Hazell due to his $6M+ buyout being too steep, all the while, the same athletic department can drop $60M+ on a new building? I'm not saying the new building is unneccessary (well, it is unneccessary, but not if we're going to actually try and win in this "arms race" that is college football), but that is not an insignificant sum. Surely, if we lose out, Hazell is gone, right? If not, would all this imply it is because Burke has actual faith in his ability to turn this around?
Looks like they've put that on the back burner for the $60M Mollenkopf expansion thingy.
Honest question - Am I supposed to seriously believe (as has been suggested), our athletic department will retain Hazell due to his $6M+ buyout being too steep, all the while, the same athletic department can drop $60M+ on a new building? I'm not saying the new building is unneccessary (well, it is unneccessary, but not if we're going to actually try and win in this "arms race" that is college football), but that is not an insignificant sum. Surely, if we lose out, Hazell is gone, right? If not, would all this imply it is because Burke has actual faith in his ability to turn this around?
When I read about this new facility,My first thought was ,they can build this,but cant cough up 6 million to fire Hazell?Looks like they've put that on the back burner for the $60M Mollenkopf expansion thingy.
Honest question - Am I supposed to seriously believe (as has been suggested), our athletic department will retain Hazell due to his $6M+ buyout being too steep, all the while, the same athletic department can drop $60M+ on a new building? I'm not saying the new building is unneccessary (well, it is unneccessary, but not if we're going to actually try and win in this "arms race" that is college football), but that is not an insignificant sum. Surely, if we lose out, Hazell is gone, right? If not, would all this imply it is because Burke has actual faith in his ability to turn this around?
It's a catch 22. If we spend that money, but still suck at football....nobody will want to come play here no matter what the facilities look like.
That said, the football offices are dark, dingy and not modern. They need a lift for sure. Getting study, weight room and casual player facilities up to par would go a long way!