I'm glad they are clarifying this a little
- Thread starter Biggie357
- Start date
another deflection on the outward apperances being different than your mother? You hit me with a fatal blow unlike any before. I truly am in a fetal position, curled up in the corner dribbling out my mouth. I was warned that my IQ would be affected here and thought...but...
Good luck recovering from the trauma that this crazy message board guy caused you and have a good Memorial Day weekend, TJ!
It wouldn't be so tough if I didn't care about getting that stamp of approval in this forum. That pulls on my insecurity and need to be accepted. If only I knew how to verbally defend myself with guns a blazing. You have a good Memorial Day as well and be thankful for those that we owe so much...
You do realize there are some that don't appreciate seeing that don't you? You obviously are a national ist and New Pal is an age ist and I'm an ism ist with a prefix not yet invented. It is so refreshing. It is as though my chains have been broken and I've been set free knowing there must be a definition in the works somewhere for me. No more Dr. Phil for me...
Oh, I absolutely understand that some don’t appreciate seeing the Stars and Stripes.
So it sounds like you had a similar epiphany. Never before I discovered this board did I know that I was demented, disturbed, sad, uneducated, brainwashed and most damning, a racist. These were all things that I learned in short order around here after never being called any of those things in my 34 years of life.
And it is refreshing, isn’t it? We’ve learned so much about ourselves. God bless you and God bless America!
Lol. And apparently I hate America because I don't approve of the president......and that's NOT a sarcastic comment.
removed the chains holding me back and keeping me in the dark so long...I'm free!
Bob, I've read what I posted many times and I see no reference to you. You are apparently seeing something that is not there...
So when you say ,"You do realize there are some that don't appreciate seeing that don't you? " who are you referring to? I wasn't talking about me specifically. I was talking about those that don't approve of trump.
Who doesn't approve of a gif of the American flag?
keep your eyes open...there are "some" that don't approve of this country. I have no idea who all or how many take the time to read anything here, but I believe there will be "some" that do NOT approve.
But you're not talking about terrorists or communists or anarchists. You're jumping on the bandwagon of trumpers who think it's cool to claim the high ground on patriotism.....God, country, and apple pie......and paint those opposed to him as evil liberals who want to redistribute the wealth, give in to the new world order and tear up the constitution.
You and the other trumpers are no more patriotic than those who are opposed to him. Maybe all of you should read the constitution you so sanctimoniously defend.
Bob, this has become such a puerile discussion going back and forth. Once again you are finding things not said and it seems somewhat common on this site. I have no idea if any people that read here have leanings to terrorists or communists (we do have one??, but that one didn't enter my mind when I typed "some") or anarchist. I also don't see where you found me jumping on the bandwagon of trumpers to claim the high ground on patriotism. I do believe in American exceptionalism and borders and although not said those beliefs put me in that category. Those that don't are welcome to explain their patriotism...if they desire...I don't care.
Now although you were still labeling me or describing not what I said or wrote, but how you read things...you did get something correct. Not that I said it, but something I do believe and so even though it has nothing to do with what I typed you are correct---liberals want to redistribute wealth. I didn't think that was something that could be contested. I thought that was a given. Where would we find something different?
New world order? Again, I'm not of that belief either, but you seem to be on a roll. I personally believe that Matthew, Daniel and Revelations were describing a historic event of almost 2000 years ago and so no....that is not me either. I have no problem with those that do...I just don't share that understanding.
You’ve danced for Democrats for a long time and this discussion made me laugh out loud. Your substance and mental issues aren’t something for myself and others to mock anymore.
I don't know if Joe Stutters, I think his teleprompter loses signal due to a bad connection or something.
The only thing I’m going to say is I pray no one you know ever has dementia. My mother has it. Middle stages. It’s been brutal seeing a fiercely independent, intelligent woman forgetting things like being my mother. I really hope karma doesn’t come for you in this way.
Dude, please just stop. I lost 2 grandparents to dementia. That’s how I knew Joe had it.
I’m truly sorry that your mother has it. It is awful.
They're not wrong. The president clearly has dementia. If you've seen someone go through it, the marks are unmistakable.
I’ll wait for a professional diagnosis vs some message board dipshits, thanks.
The irony of this statement coming from you is hilarious.
You: 'REEEEEE I have first hand experience with this so I know he doesn't have it'
Others: 'Well I too have first hand knowledge and the signs are there'
You: 'REEE I ignore your situation and require a professional diagnosis but I still know better'
Hypocrite.
I would venture to say that everyone has at least one family member (close or distant) who has had dementia. Acting like you're the ONLY ONE who is familiar with it is not surprising coming from you. I will say this, it takes a special kind of stupid to know first hand what dementia is all about but still vote for someone suffering from it to lead the free world. And you are one of if not THE last person on this board that should throwing around karma.
You realize that would never, ever be allowed to happen, right? There are too many political careers and too much money and too many things at stake for the White House to ever allow for Biden to be examined for that.
It's the same reason Trump was never really analyzed, despite clearly showing some signs of neurosyphilis throughout his tenure
It has been said that bravery and stupidity are many times two sides of the same coin. Such is the dilemma some of the voters must wrestle with today…
The best thing for this country in 2024 will be anyone EXCEPT Trump v. Biden representing each party again. These two dumbass organizations need to move the **** on.
Problem is, I think if Trump is indeed the R nominee, Ds will stick with Biden because they perceive it as safe. What a disaster… 78 year old pathological liar narcissist vs. 82 year old in the throes of dimentia.
Problem is, I think if Trump is indeed the R nominee, Ds will stick with Biden because they perceive it as safe. What a disaster… 78 year old pathological liar narcissist vs. 82 year old in the throes of dimentia.
Hopefully you’ll learn your lesson and not vote for Biden again if these two have a rematch
It's amusing to me we have a minimum age requirement for the office but not a maximum. The latter being every bit as dangerous.
Actually, the latter "could be" every bit as dangerous. There are older people less dangerous than those younger, but I'm not sure someone under 35 should even be voting. Many knew ole Joe had mental issues before taking office. It is all here in the archives somewhere. Son-in-law's mother "HAD" to quit her job in Germany doing social work that she loved due to age (low 60s?)that she was not ready to quit and apparently good at what she did...
"For a while democracy extends the spere of indiviual freedom, socialism restricts it. As democracy attaches all possible value to each man; socialism makes each man a mere agent, a mere number. Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but oen word: equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude. Hence the science of despotism, which was once so complex, has been simplified and reduced, as it were, to a single principle" thoughts by Alexis De Tocqueville over a hundred years ago...
