ADVERTISEMENT

GOP's maneuvering during the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings will seriously damage the Supreme Court

  • Like
Reactions: atmafola
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opini...ion-hearings-will-seriously-damage-ncna907216

They're absolutely shameless in the quest for power and destroying our institutions.
Denying Garland a vote for nearly a year.
Removing the 60 vote threshold to push through Gorsuch.
Hiding the vast majority of Kavanaugh's record so he won't be actually vetted.
And protesters act like complete imbeciles in the confirmation hearing. He's going to be confirmed. Too bad if you don't like it. I think Sotomayor and Kagan were much less qualified than either Kavanaugh or Gorsuch, yet you didn't see the right make a mockery of the confirmation hearings. Great job Corey Booker, I mean Spartacus.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/protesters-continue-interrupt-kavanaugh-hearings-042925462--politics.html

Destroying our institutions? LMAO. It was the Ds under Harry Reid who changed the rules for getting judges confirmed. And the 60 vote threshold didn't always exist in the Senate, either. Do a little research. It was reverted back to its earlier form.
 
Politics is not about compromise and reaching mutually agreed upon policy conclusions, and republicans understand this. It is about one class of people dictating the terms of government to another. Republicans will go to any lengths to entrench their minoritarian power. They will shred the constitution before they allow the majority of Americans have their say in government.

If you are anything but a far rightist, you need to start coming to the understanding that republicans are not good faith actors seeking the best outcomes for the majority of people. This is a shrinking minority of Americans desperately clinging to power. Republicans cannot he allowed to hold power at any level of government in any position.
 
Politics is not about compromise and reaching mutually agreed upon policy conclusions, and republicans understand this. It is about one class of people dictating the terms of government to another. Republicans will go to any lengths to entrench their minoritarian power. They will shred the constitution before they allow the majority of Americans have their say in government.

If you are anything but a far rightist, you need to start coming to the understanding that republicans are not good faith actors seeking the best outcomes for the majority of people. This is a shrinking minority of Americans desperately clinging to power. Republicans cannot he allowed to hold power at any level of government in any position.
And Socialists are? Socialism has no place in the government of the USA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: boiler800
It will be interesting to see how a court that is to the right of the public on some issues will play out. For example, according to Pew Research, 69%of Americans say Roe v. Wade should not be completely overturned but I would bet it is overturned with this court within 2 years. Do not wish to argue about Roe v. Wade, I am just using that as one example of decisions that will be overturned.
 
It will be interesting to see how a court that is to the right of the public on some issues will play out. For example, according to Pew Research, 69%of Americans say Roe v. Wade should not be completely overturned but I would bet it is overturned with this court within 2 years. Do not wish to argue about Roe v. Wade, I am just using that as one example of decisions that will be overturned.
I don't think roe v. Wade will be overturned. I do think that a case or two may seek to refine Roe vs. Wade in coming years, and it (they) will get more attention than they deserve, but in the end at least a form of Roe vs. Wade will still be the law of the land.
 
I don't think roe v. Wade will be overturned. I do think that a case or two may seek to refine Roe vs. Wade in coming years, and it (they) will get more attention than they deserve, but in the end at least a form of Roe vs. Wade will still be the law of the land.
I would bet on it! ;) o_O I think it will then be a state issue. Frankly, I don't think Trump is interested in social issues so it will be the Supreme Court, not Trump, which will also be interesting.
 
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opini...ion-hearings-will-seriously-damage-ncna907216

They're absolutely shameless in the quest for power and destroying our institutions.
Denying Garland a vote for nearly a year.
Removing the 60 vote threshold to push through Gorsuch.
Hiding the vast majority of Kavanaugh's record so he won't be actually vetted.
For Christ's sake would you all just give it up with the bull and the lies....What was done with Garland had been done previously with a Republican nominee so that's nothing new and done by your party first.
Your boy Harry did away with the 60 vote threshold, so blame a liberal Demolib for that one.
No one is holding anything from Kavanaugh's records that amounts to a hill of beans....they're records from when he was a secretary.

You and those like you are sounding and acting like young children when you get your toys put up or you get sent to bed. Trump IS YOUR President. And Kavanaugh is gong to be on the SCOTUS.
 
It will be interesting to see how a court that is to the right of the public on some issues will play out. For example, according to Pew Research, 69%of Americans say Roe v. Wade should not be completely overturned but I would bet it is overturned with this court within 2 years. Do not wish to argue about Roe v. Wade, I am just using that as one example of decisions that will be overturned.
Beth, where's your concern for the unborn? And it needs to be overturned and sent back to being in the State's Rights catagory as it should never have been a Federal law to begin with. I think you will find Kananaugh to be much more of a constitutionalist, and much less a legislator from the bench as Ginsberg and Soto.
 
  • Like
Reactions: boiler800
Beth, where's your concern for the unborn? And it needs to be overturned and sent back to being in the State's Rights catagory as it should never have been a Federal law to begin with. I think you will find Kananaugh to be much more of a constitutionalist, and much less a legislator from the bench as Ginsberg and Soto.
Hi TwinDegrees2, I said nothing about my views on Roe v. Wade. It was just an example of changes I think this court will bring. Kavanaugh is young by Supreme Court averages so he will be there a long time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: miksta
It is really shocking how folks are giving upvotes to the above comment from a communist.

First, it pertains to the ideology, but more importantly, his post is incredibly innacurate with regard to the outcome of nationwide elections and sentiment.

Remember their names and realize that if you engage them, you are engaging a child.

Miksta - child.
Bill - child.
atmolfa - child.

These are not serious people.
 
It is really shocking how folks are giving upvotes to the above comment from a communist.

First, it pertains to the ideology, but more importantly, his post is incredibly innacurate with regard to the outcome of nationwide elections and sentiment.

Remember their names and realize that if you engage them, you are engaging a child.

Miksta - child.
Bill - child.
atmolfa - child.

These are not serious people.

You really throw a lot of temper tantrums about who "likes" what. You're also consistently wrong in your temper tantrums about people using "whataboutism," for the record.

Get a grip. Put the bottle down. Get out of the 1960s. *Communist* *Shudder*
 
  • Like
Reactions: indy35
Ramblings of a neophyte. A child.

Man, McCain's funeral sure wore off quick.
 
Kavanaugh lied under oath about his knowledge and involvement in an illegal scheme in the Bush White House to use stolen campaign information from Democrats.
This Supreme Court fight is beyond politics. This is even beyond dirty politics. This is the shattering of the rule of law. If we were in a time where the Republicans still had some shame or integrity, this would end the nomination just by itself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: miksta
Kavanaugh lied under oath about his knowledge and involvement in an illegal scheme in the Bush White House to use stolen campaign information from Democrats.
This Supreme Court fight is beyond politics. This is even beyond dirty politics. This is the shattering of the rule of law. If we were in a time where the Republicans still had some shame or integrity, this would end the nomination just by itself.
Convincing evidence of moral turpitude should be disqualifying. Every honest lawyer knows that. We live in very strange times.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: miksta
Kavanaugh lied under oath about his knowledge and involvement in an illegal scheme in the Bush White House to use stolen campaign information from Democrats.
This Supreme Court fight is beyond politics. This is even beyond dirty politics. This is the shattering of the rule of law. If we were in a time where the Republicans still had some shame or integrity, this would end the nomination just by itself.
Proof that he lied.....where is it?. It's easy to toss it against a wall and see if it sticks...Kavanaugh by all counts of those who have defended him...young, old, black, white, male, female, Repub, Democrat all say the same thing and that is he was absolutely the most qualified to be picked to do it the right way...not the Conservative way, and not the liberal way, but based on the Constitution.

He'll be appointed by GOP and Dem's alike and he'll be very good at the job for a lot of years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: boiler800
Proof that he lied.....where is it?. It's easy to toss it against a wall and see if it sticks...Kavanaugh by all counts of those who have defended him...young, old, black, white, male, female, Repub, Democrat all say the same thing and that is he was absolutely the most qualified to be picked to do it the right way...not the Conservative way, and not the liberal way, but based on the Constitution.

He'll be appointed by GOP and Dem's alike and he'll be very good at the job for a lot of years.

What a crock. He was picked because of his beliefs about the special counsel, and of course the standard Republican willingness to roll back worker protections.

Kavanaugh claimed he had never seen “any documents that appeared to you to have been drafted or prepared by Democratic staff members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.” At the time, Manuel Miranda, a Republican Senate aide, had improperly obtained and circulated thousands of private Democratic files detailing strategies for opposing Bush’s judicial nominees. Kavanaugh insisted in his 2004 confirmation hearings that he never saw any of the files Miranda obtained, telling Sen. Orrin Hatch, “I was not aware of that matter in any way whatsoever until I learned it in the media.”

Kavanaugh was in fact on the emails that Miranda had stolen. His denying knowing anything about them is perjury.

https://abovethelaw.com/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-perjured-himself-impeachment/
 
What a crock. He was picked because of his beliefs about the special counsel, and of course the standard Republican willingness to roll back worker protections.

Kavanaugh claimed he had never seen “any documents that appeared to you to have been drafted or prepared by Democratic staff members of the Senate Judiciary Committee.” At the time, Manuel Miranda, a Republican Senate aide, had improperly obtained and circulated thousands of private Democratic files detailing strategies for opposing Bush’s judicial nominees. Kavanaugh insisted in his 2004 confirmation hearings that he never saw any of the files Miranda obtained, telling Sen. Orrin Hatch, “I was not aware of that matter in any way whatsoever until I learned it in the media.”

Kavanaugh was in fact on the emails that Miranda had stolen. His denying knowing anything about them is perjury.

https://abovethelaw.com/2018/09/brett-kavanaugh-perjured-himself-impeachment/


As of 2016, David Lat; Elie Mystal, Staci Zaretsky, Joe Patrice and Kathryn Rubino make up the publication's editorial staff, joined by a number of columnists from across the legal landscape.[2]

In 2011, Above the Law was sued for $50 million for an erroneous story about a rape to which one of its articles linked; the lawsuit was ultimately settled out of court.[10][11]

In 2016, Above the Law received criticism from many publications when its Breaking Media Editor at Large, Elie Mystal, wrote an article suggesting that jury nullification of crimes by African Americans against whites could be used by jurors as a form of protest

More of Miz Mystal's ramblings: From the Washington Times.....
Elie Mystal, editor of Above The Law, said acquitting black defendants regardless of guilt would “put the shoe on the other foot for a change.”

“Maybe it’s time for black people to use the same tool white people have been using to defy a system they do not consent to: jury nullification,” Mr. Mystalsaid in the op-ed published Wednesday. “White juries regularly refuse to convict or indict cops for murder. White juries refuse to convict vigilantes who murder black children. White juries refuse to convict other white people for property crimes.

“Maybe it’s time minorities got in the game?” he continued. “Black people lucky enough to get on a jury could use that power to acquit any person charged with a crime against white men and white male institutions.”

Really...fairness in the judicial system????


Mr. Mystal, a graduate of Harvard Law School, said the severity of the crime makes no difference.

“Assault? Acquit. Burglary? Acquit. Insider trading? Acquit,” he said. “Murder? … what the hell do you think is happening to black people out there? What the hell do you think we’re complaining about when your cops shoot us or choke us? Acquit.”

Hardly a worthy reference to base your argument about Kavanaugh's seating on the SCOTUS.
 
Hardly a worthy reference to base your argument about Kavanaugh's seating on the SCOTUS.


I just picked one of the first links, you can search it and find all kinds of references. It really doesn't matter because it's black and white. We have Kavanaugh's testimony from the confirmation hearings, we have the emails/documents that Leahy released showing Kavanaugh was lying about his knowledge of the stolen documents.
 
Last edited:
I just picked one of the first links, you can search it and find all kinds of references. It really doesn't matter because it's black and white. We have Kavanaugh's testimony from the confirmation hearings, we have the emails/documents that Leahy released showing Kavanaugh was lying about his knowledge of the stolen documents.

Yeah, he really should have just Googled it himself first before digging this hole. Will be entertaining watching him dig deeper and deeper, though!
 
Yeah, he really should have just Googled it himself first before digging this hole. Will be entertaining watching him dig deeper and deeper, though!
All your negative rhetoric will mean nothing. He will be confirmed.
 
Google “Harry Reid Nuclear Option”...
Well aware of that. Republicans had unprecedented obstruction on lower level appointments. Reid changed that so we'd have some level of proper functioning government. Republicans changed it for the Supreme Court. Democrats have hardly done anything to put roadblocks in front of Trump appointees as they've not played the same game. Republicans are shameless.
 
Well aware of that. Republicans had unprecedented obstruction on lower level appointments. Reid changed that so we'd have some level of proper functioning government. Republicans changed it for the Supreme Court. Democrats have hardly done anything to put roadblocks in front of Trump appointees as they've not played the same game. Republicans are shameless.
man you are a complete partisan tool and your memory is short and selective.
 
Well aware of that. Republicans had unprecedented obstruction on lower level appointments. Reid changed that so we'd have some level of proper functioning government. Republicans changed it for the Supreme Court. Democrats have hardly done anything to put roadblocks in front of Trump appointees as they've not played the same game. Republicans are shameless.
Reid changed that because he then could run rough shod over the GOP.
 
Reid changed that because he then could run rough shod over the GOP.
If that was the reasoning than why didn’t he do that once it was done? All they ended up doing was some confirmations that had been dragged out to record long levels for no legitimate reason.
 
If that was the reasoning than why didn’t he do that once it was done? All they ended up doing was some confirmations that had been dragged out to record long levels for no legitimate reason.
Because there wasn’t an opening between Reid’s exercising of the nuclear option and when the republicans took the senate back in 2014.

Bush had the same thing done to him when the Republicans controlled the Senate, and they never resorted to the nuclear option.
 
Well aware of that. Republicans had unprecedented obstruction on lower level appointments. Reid changed that so we'd have some level of proper functioning government. Republicans changed it for the Supreme Court. Democrats have hardly done anything to put roadblocks in front of Trump appointees as they've not played the same game. Republicans are shameless.
Okay, now I get...you're pulling our legs.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT