ADVERTISEMENT

For those that think there was nothing to Climategate

Thanks for posting. I can't recall who said that two of the most dangerous words in our language are, 'experts say,' but this sure looks like it might be an application.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
That's not even close to proof.
 
The earth has had climate change since the beginning of time. In the 70s they predicted an ice age. Lol

Maybe all the ev‘s will move us back into the ice age.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
The earth has had climate change since the beginning of time. In the 70s they predicted an ice age. Lol

Maybe all the ev‘s will move us back into the ice age.

Man has been screaming climate change for well over 100 years. First it was cooling, then it was warming, then it was cooling again, and now it's warming again. SSDD.

There were letters written that if you were to read them today and didn't know when they were written, you'd think it was no more than 5-10 years ago. They talked about the shrinking snowfall and how winter is warmer than usual. They were written in the era of the founding fathers in the late 1700's. Climate changes all the time. There is NO evidence that this is man made.
 
Last edited:
climate change is real, prove it.
He can't. That's the problem. He, like all the others, just want to trust that they are being told the truth. They can't handle the idea that they are being taken for a ride. Truth is to hard and to scary for him to actually look for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG
Climate change is real. Keep eating that slop though.
2 simple questions. So when was the optimum temperature? In what year? More people die from extreme cold than extreme heat. And warmer climates allow for longer growing seasons. So it seems like today might be better than 30 years ago.

Second. As most MMGW contrarians ask, why do all the tables and graphs start in the 50s on? Hint. Because is you start moving our further you see that the last 75 years (which is just a blip on the Earths exist existence) when stretched out to a couple hundred years show very little difference.

#IndependentThought.
 
He can't. That's the problem. He, like all the others, just want to trust that they are being told the truth. They can't handle the idea that they are being taken for a ride. Truth is to hard and to scary for him to actually look for it.
Cheap reliable energy is the #1 factor in pulling people out of poverty and stabilizing societies. Want to destabilize societies make them hungry. Who benefits from destabilization? Globalists and leftist. Hungry people turn to the State or revolt. Either way the State wins. They create masses which become reliant. Or they kill off opposition in the name of patriotism.

What do you think all these crazy ass rules about wash machines, light bulbs, and dishwashers are about? It’s control and getting the masses to accept less. Is an electric car more environmentally friendly? F’ no. The rare earth mining and disposal is an environmental hazard. But the electric car is too expensive for many people and limits mobility greatly. It also punishes rural citizens (try finding a charging station in Wyoming) . And who are the people who live Wyoming?
 
Last edited:
Cheap reliable energy is the #1 factor in pulling people out of poverty and stabilizing societies. Want to destabilize societies make them hungry. Who benefits from destabilization? Globalists and leftist. Hungry people turn to the State or revolt. Either way the State wins. They create masses which become reliant. Or they kill off opposition in the name of patriotism.

What do you think all these crazy ass rules about wash machines, light bulbs, and dishwashers are about? It’s control and getting the masses to accept less. Is an electric car more environmentally friendly? F’ no. The rare earth mining and disposal is an environmental hazard. But the electric car is too expensive for many people and limits mobility greatly. It also punishes rural citizens (try finding a charging station in Wyoming) . And who are the people who live Wyoming?
Outstanding post.

Would add the child/slave labor involved in mining cobalt et al.
 
2 simple questions. So when was the optimum temperature? In what year? More people die from extreme cold than extreme heat. And warmer climates allow for longer growing seasons. So it seems like today might be better than 30 years ago.

Second. As most MMGW contrarians ask, why do all the tables and graphs start in the 50s on? Hint. Because is you start moving our further you see that the last 75 years (which is just a blip on the Earths exist existence) when stretched out to a couple hundred years show very little difference.

#IndependentThought.
I would hope you know that climate change is about more than "oh it's a little warmer, how nice!" but that would be expecting way too much. Cool hashtag though, I'm sure your youtube algo is a sight to behold
 
That's the cool thing about it being true: I don't have to prove it. It still is. Enjoy your cable news.
Global warming is an excuse for the left to ram through their crazy policies that give the government more and more control over our lives. Not too complicated, Teddy. It’s simple enough for you to even possibly understand.
 
That's the cool thing about it being true: I don't have to prove it. It still is. Enjoy your cable news.
It's true that the climate changes. It has for eons, and it will continue to do so long after you're eaten by earthworms. But, there's no evidence than man impacts the climate.
What's much more likely to impact the climate is the fact that the earth and sun are floating around in space and it's entirely possible that they randomly move closer or further at certain times, even in very small distances. This has more impact on climate than cow farts.
 
Great deflection, my man. Especially to a thing I don't give a shit about.
Predictably, you missed the point.

Here is your statement: "That's the cool thing about it being true: I don't have to prove it."

That's the same closed thinking of a religious fanatic, ISIS terrorist, racist, etc. You know you're right so nothing else matters and nothing needs to be proven.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Is he eating bugs now like the WEF wants him to? @TeddyValentineDidNothingWrong

Teddy won't answer because he drives a gas powered car, pushes a gas powered lawn mower, flies on gas powered planes, but loves to point the finger and all the problems man is causing to the climate. Typical lefty lib.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Riveting-
I would hope you know that climate change is about more than "oh it's a little warmer, how nice!" but that would be expecting way too much. Cool hashtag though, I'm sure your youtube algo is a sight to behold
Well it used to be about “warming” until it stopped warming. Them they had to redefine language.

So no answer to the questions? Why do tables start in around the 50s when data is available for well before? I know, things like hurricanes. But why not then incorporate the 1870s, 1910s, and 1940s? 3 really bad decades for hurricanes. But outside that graph in the NYT. Why not display ALL the date for the public?

And what was the optimal climate? In the 70s we were warned about Global freezing. Did we escape that thanks the global warming or are we just in a short warning spike often experienced right before a mini ice age?

Fact. The climate has always changed and often far more drastically and quicker than current. Please explain why.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
Well it used to be about “warming” until it stopped warming. Them they had to redefine language.

So no answer to the questions? Why do tables start in around the 50s when data is available for well before? I know, things like hurricanes. But why not then incorporate the 1870s, 1910s, and 1940s? 3 really bad decades for hurricanes. But outside that graph in the NYT. Why not display ALL the date for the public?

And what was the optimal climate? In the 70s we were warned about Global freezing. Did we escape that thanks the global warming or are we just in a short warning spike often experienced right before a mini ice age?

Fact. The climate has always changed and often far more drastically and quicker than current. Please explain why.
Neanderthals and other early human forms caused it, I bet, once they figured out how to light fires.
 
Outstanding post.

Would add the child/slave labor involved in mining cobalt et al.
Cobalt mining for EVs in DRC is horrific. Stories about six year olds being sent into mines with spoons to get to small deposits with their little hands. And guess who controls this? China. If to ask why certain people want to throw away our control of our energy and transportation to an authoritarian government that hates us. Hope s the progressives read this to understand what they support. I remember when the left cared about human rights.

https://www.theverge.com/2022/2/15/...-ev-electriv-vehicle-working-conditions-congo
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boilermaker03
That's the cool thing about it being true: I don't have to prove it. It still is. Enjoy your cable news.
What is the established science to prohibit the gas range? And why move to electric ranges which are less energy efficient because the heat source is not immediate and wastes energy coming up to heating temperature?

And most importantly. What is the source of energy for the electric stove? Which in many places will be….wait for it….natural gas….which will be required in greater amount because it has to be converted to electricity and then used by the less efficiency electric stove. But there will be less of it due to govt. restrictions so it will cost the citizenry more.

You see. This really isn’t about “saving the planet.” It’s about exacting control and make the population poorer. If you don’t think so explain to me how the above is incorrect.

#IndependentThought
#ThinkForYourself
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT