People who make the argument that she has less points per game as a reason she isn't as good are really uneducated idiots.
Different eras blah blah blah. 3 years vs 4, he didn't have a 3 point shot....
What you can compare apples to apples is shot attempts per game for their career
Maravich: 38.1/game
Clark 19.9/game
For context Edey has shot 10.4/game
Image if Zach literally shot 4 times more than what he shoots now! People would be yelling from the top of buildings he's just a volume chucker.
Clark is doing this while taking almost HALF the shot attempts per game Pete took. She has taken almost exactly 500 less total shots than him even in 50 more total games. Yes she has the benefit of the 3 line which she has also made about 500 so it's fairly easy to see why her numbers have just passed his. She also has nearly 3% better total shooting numbers.
One thing people never talk about is while she is leading the country in scoring she is also leading the country in ASSISTS! How?
She is averaging almost 9 assists (8.7) per game which in itself is insane, but doing so while she also shots 20 times a game is nearly unbelievable.
I am not here to discredit Maravich. He was an incredible player, but just looking at points per game is an idiotic way to compare career stats. Especially when the players played in different lifetimes.
It's crazy people jump through hoops to say well she isn't as good as X player. Who cares. What she is doing is historic and awful fun to watch.
Wow! I did not know Pistol Pete took nearly twice as many shots per game as Caitlin Clark. And, you're right, her assist numbers are off the charts.
They're both all-time greats. No reason to denigrate either.