ADVERTISEMENT

Faux News' Jesse Watters' Friend Got DOGE'd

Curious how many of the posters in this thread truly rely on social security to get by?

And if you are okay with a DOGE-inspired interruption of benefits?

Please do not deflect or divert - would that be fine with you?
I use it, but could get by with any interruption. I have not touched my 401, IRAs and such and have enough cash to go a few months if needed. I'm perfectly fine with an inspired interruption. All the people before Trump knew they needed to make cuts, but were afraid of the political fallout. I was not for the automotive bailout although it would have meant maybe a loss of a job? In a way it is similar to people's views on education. Most believe education is in trouble and needs revamped, except for their school. Their school is fine! ;)

It is the Lake Wobegon effect where a person's thoughts about them differs from how they view outside their interest.
 
I use it, but could get by with any interruption. I have not touched my 401, IRAs and such and have enough cash to go a few months if needed. I'm perfectly fine with an inspired interruption. All the people before Trump knew they needed to make cuts, but were afraid of the political fallout. I was not for the automotive bailout although it would have meant maybe a loss of a job? In a way it is similar to people's views on education. Most believe education is in trouble and needs revamped, except for their school. Their school is fine! ;)

It is the Lake Wobegon effect where a person's thoughts about them differs from how they view outside their interest.
You don't "truly rely" on it then, but I very much appreciate the civil response.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tjreese
.
Wow - you two are terrible at reading comprehension.

I asked for comment from posters that
  1. truly rely on Social Security, and asked them
  2. not to deflect or divert.

One of you apparently does not rely in any way on social security, and of course, @Diverting cannot answer the most straightforward question without deflecting or diverting.

.
And you are terrible at telling the truth.

Have you been busted for lying on any of the other fan forums you befoul?
 
And you are terrible at telling the truth.

Have you been busted for lying on any of the other fan forums you befoul?
More diversion and deflection. Let's try again:

how many of the posters in this thread truly rely on social security to get by?

And if you are okay with a DOGE-inspired interruption of benefits?

Please do not deflect or divert - would that be fine with you?
 
More diversion and deflection. Let's try again:

how many of the posters in this thread truly rely on social security to get by?

And if you are okay with a DOGE-inspired interruption of benefits?

Please do not deflect or divert - would that be fine with you?
Don’t need it at all. Can do everything I want to do if never receiving another dime. My wife and I don’t receive a pension either.
 
More diversion and deflection. Let's try again:

how many of the posters in this thread truly rely on social security to get by?
How would any of us know how many? What a dumb question.
And if you are okay with a DOGE-inspired interruption of benefits?
Depends on whose benefits are interrupted. I don't mind if dead people receiving SS get their payments interrupted and their fraudulent relatives put in the slammer with hard labor.
Please do not deflect or divert - would that be fine with you?
Deflecting or diverting is far preferable to lying.
 
What CEO of a large corporation, let alone, the largest corporation in the world (the USA), is going to get into the weeds and get granular on every little detail or department? None.
That's why they hire, delegate, and decide.

I'm sure when Trump heard that USAid was giving US taxpayers money to fund transgender operas in Peru, that he immediately sicked the dogs on that organization and gutted is (rightfully so).
Well no sh/t. Thanks for making my argument.

You and others want to act like Musk doesn't do anything without approval from trump. Musk makes recommendations and trump approves them.

If there's any supervision at all from trump, it's likely a question of how much money is going be saved.

Can you guys make a post without referring to some transgender program? Kinda obsessed.

Why don't you say when trump heard USAID was saving lives in the sh/thole countries in Africa he immediately sicked the dogs on the organization?

The transgender programs were only a tiny fraction of foreign aid. Yet you guys refer to them in every conversation. Grow some Catholic balls and say you're good with letting the poor die from starvation and disease.

The program you're infatuated with in South America was actually in Columbia and it was a STATE DEPARTMENT PROGRAM for the third time. If you're gonna repeat the same talking points over and over at least get your facts straight.
 
How would any of us know how many? What a dumb question.

Depends on whose benefits are interrupted. I don't mind if dead people receiving SS get their payments interrupted and their fraudulent relatives put in the slammer with hard labor.

Deflecting or diverting is far preferable to lying.
Another lie by the great patriot. You know that's not happening right?
Well, it may have happened a few times. That's all it takes for you to say your post was correct despite the fact you thought it was widespread.

 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT