Faux News' Jesse Watters' Friend Got DOGE'd
- Thread starter BNIBoiler
- Start date
Since you seem to be so sure of yourself of what you believe his motives are, how about you provide some proof that he isn't just supporting his country instead of acting like a smug asshole.Musk is supporting his country?!!?
THAT’s what you believe his motivation is?
The clown show are these leftist judges trying to tell the executive branch how they are able to manage their own departments.
Not trolling at all - I am truly curious as to your thoughts:
Firing immigration judges whom are needed to effectuate deportations; you are good with that or not?
I AM SO GLAD YOU ASKED, PART II:
Musk has inside track to take over contract to fix air traffic communications system
A satellite company owned by Elon Musk is on a possible fast track to take over a large federal contract to modernize the nation’s air traffic communications system.
apnews.com
I AM SO GLAD YOU ASKED, PART III:
Musk's SpaceX Lands FAA Contract -- Conflict of Interest Be Damned
Elon Musk's SpaceX landed an FAA contract to use Starlink after the billionaire fired hundreds of the agency's employees.
www.rollingstone.com
I AM SO GLAD YOU ASKED, PART IV:
.
I AM SO GLAD YOU ASKED, PART V:
Tesla's $400 million armored EV US gov contract was indeed shady
New information about the $400 million US government contract for “armored Tesla” vehicles that was reportedly put on hold makes...
electrek.co
So, the richest, most successful business man in the world has contracts with the US Govt? Why would this not be expected?
SO GLAD YOU ASKED TOO!
"...the richest, most successful business man in the world has contracts with the US Govt?"
It would be expected.
But the richest businessman in the world with those government contracts is now determining which federal agencies, and therein, which federal contracts live, die, or get privatized as a result of his decisions. That is a conflict of interest on an almost unimaginable level.
Biggest conflict of interest ever. I could be prosecuted if I did this as a civilian.
No need to be rude, B2. Since you said you have never had to do regular reports for a job, I assumed you worked for the government.
But I can see that many private jobs you might be qualified for would not require reporting - pizza delivery, grocery sacker, retail clerk, etc.
I do not disparage those types of jobs by the way, as long as no illegalities are involved.
Musk isn't deciding anything. He's an advisor to the POTUS. Trump decides whether to act on those recommendations.
Do you think Trump has acted on 100% of EM's recommendations?
Is it a conflict of interest when Nancy Pelosi makes stock trades based on information she gathered from committees she sat on that had an impact on awarded govt contracts?
Are you suggesting she is not the greatest investor of our time after all? Shocking.
I have and perhaps it was due to some potential reductions in the near future? I did that under a few supervisors. Part of the issue beside reductions in my perspective is that supervisors today have less personal involvement with their people and really don't know what all they are doing. Another is getting requests outside your department to help, but the supervisor wants to be informed. When dealing with supplier issues there might be group department meetings where the group was updated based upon the updated status of a supplier with an issue...quality and/or insufficient production. Communication was considered crucial when problems are encountered.
Last edited:
yes obviously she's a clown. When have I ever defended her? Musk is worse. He won no election.
Whattaboutism. Lots of legislators trade on inside info IMO. If they do so? There's a criminal statute that is designed to address that and if probable cause exists that should be charged.
Of course, the new Director of the FBI has stated that he wants the FBI to move away from financial crimes and address violent crimes such as rapes and murders. Unfortunately that guy has quite literally never worked one single day in law enforcement, never mind federal law enforcement. And rapes and murders are most certainly not federal crimes. Effing clown show.
Last edited:
For crissakes! Musk is an unelected, no-security clearance, cabinet-level official that Trump has tapped to have access to the most confidential personal information processed by the government, and to make wholesale personnel decisions.
I'm cool with you defending some choices that Trump makes - there are policy decisions that are absolutely his prerogative, But is there no bridge too far for Trump that you will not defend?
Of course Nancy Pelosi sucks. What the hell does that have to do with the current unimaginably horrible conflicts of interest by Musk?
Liar liar pants on fire. Musk has a top secret security clearance.
I don’t see him any worse than people who have won elections. I don’t see Musk as being motivated by money anymore since he has so much. These elected politicians sure seem to get rich while in office.
Now I'm getting confused. Last time you said he was an a$$. Is he an idiot or a$$ so I can keep up.
What auditor won an election? reminds me of a brother-in-law that ran for congress years ago and his political thoughts of electing a wealthy person so he doesn't have to become wealthy in office
Unfortunately they haven’t, so the crime continues. There’s such a large percentage of the voting base that doesn’t really know what goes on.
That is a silly argument. Musk is a de facto Cabinet member just as Biden appointed Swift Boat Kerry to his Cabinet as the "U.S. special presidential envoy for climate." That job didn't exist until Biden created it with a wave of his hand. The voters didn't have the option of removing Kerry either. The voters cannot remove any Cabinet members.
Similar threads
