ADVERTISEMENT

EXTEND PAINTER!!!!

Feb 5, 2006
3,276
369
83
How great it is to see not only the team make it to the sweet 16 but also CMP to continue prove the negatwitts on here wrong time and time again.

It must really be bad for c3pr, boneheadfish, vagem, not4purdue and the couple other morons that post here against Painter right now since he continues to show how little they know and continue to do things his way and be successful and make those idiots look like fools in the process. And what is funny is I doubt even one of them will sack up and admit how wrong they were. But that is okay their credibility is shot on here regardless.

What a great day to not be a bandwagon fan like the negatwitts and have our support rewarded with a trip to the sweet 16!
 
How great it is to see not only the team make it to the sweet 16 but also CMP to continue prove the negatwitts on here wrong time and time again.

It must really be bad for c3pr, boneheadfish, vagem, not4purdue and the couple other morons that post here against Painter right now since he continues to show how little they know and continue to do things his way and be successful and make those idiots look like fools in the process. And what is funny is I doubt even one of them will sack up and admit how wrong they were. But that is okay their credibility is shot on here regardless.

What a great day to not be a bandwagon fan like the negatwitts and have our support rewarded with a trip to the sweet 16!
Hear hear!
 
  • Like
Reactions: chaspark
Hummell, Kramer and Ryne Smith all had comments about the excellence of the entire coaching staff on their Twitter feeds after the game. They specifically mentioned the sets called during the game, especially at the end for PJ's three. Do I think Biggie stayed out too long? Yes. But that's about it. ISU is a good team and you had to know they would make a run at some point. We survived the run. We advance.
 
I just wish he could handle a lead. I think the first step is closing out in close games and this year has been great.

I had a national show on last night on Sirius. They questioned Painter's sub patterns, but said as odd as it was to let Iowa State back in, his X's and O's were great, sometimes players don't execute. Interesting take.
 
I just wish he could handle a lead. I think the first step is closing out in close games and this year has been great.

I had a national show on last night on Sirius. They questioned Painter's sub patterns, but said as odd as it was to let Iowa State back in, his X's and O's were great, sometimes players don't execute. Interesting take.
The part I bolded is the most important thing to remember. When on the court, the players have to execute and we didn't during Iowa State's run. Now, I do think Painter kept Biggie out too long but I can kind of understand why he did because we needed him at the end.

Also let's keep in mind Iowa State was a 5 see and no slouch of a team, especially at shooting the 3. So while their comeback was concerning it really isn't all that surprising. And losing large leads isn't just something that happens to Purdue as it seems to happen more and more often.
 
How great it is to see not only the team make it to the sweet 16 but also CMP to continue prove the negatwitts on here wrong time and time again.

It must really be bad for c3pr, boneheadfish, vagem, not4purdue and the couple other morons that post here against Painter right now since he continues to show how little they know and continue to do things his way and be successful and make those idiots look like fools in the process. And what is funny is I doubt even one of them will sack up and admit how wrong they were. But that is okay their credibility is shot on here regardless.

What a great day to not be a bandwagon fan like the negatwitts and have our support rewarded with a trip to the sweet 16!

You need a hobby in the worst way.
 
I think the OP misses a bit of the larger picure here

rather than continuing to be a watchdog of other posters (who are likely just iu fans or 1 disgruntled pu fan with many usernames anyway),

we may need to continue to be the watchdog of the athletic dept, making sure mb2 is truly not mb1

with coaching changes occurring in conference and elsewhere in similar power five teams, painters salary rank can continue to decline

if we go as far as I think we can this year and also maintain a high program level, we better be prepared to pony up again big if you want to retain painter...
a substantial raise not just an extension like mb1 did
 
How great it is to see not only the team make it to the sweet 16 but also CMP to continue prove the negatwitts on here wrong time and time again.

It must really be bad for c3pr, boneheadfish, vagem, not4purdue and the couple other morons that post here against Painter right now since he continues to show how little they know and continue to do things his way and be successful and make those idiots look like fools in the process. And what is funny is I doubt even one of them will sack up and admit how wrong they were. But that is okay their credibility is shot on here regardless.

What a great day to not be a bandwagon fan like the negatwitts and have our support rewarded with a trip to the sweet 16!
Um, we already extended him last summer, but don't let that get in the way of a really fresh, hot take.
 
I think the OP misses a bit of the larger picure here

rather than continuing to be a watchdog of other posters (who are likely just iu fans or 1 disgruntled pu fan with many usernames anyway),

we may need to continue to be the watchdog of the athletic dept, making sure mb2 is truly not mb1

with coaching changes occurring in conference and elsewhere in similar power five teams, painters salary rank can continue to decline

if we go as far as I think we can this year and also maintain a high program level, we better be prepared to pony up again big if you want to retain painter...
a substantial raise not just an extension like mb1 did
The thing many here don't consider is that there are other programs who would slobber down their shirts to get Painter. And some are ready to pay to get him. No, I have zero rumors or hearsay, but I can see his resume' as well as anyone else can.

And, it is amusing to see how those coaches that came up for discussion as good replacements for him last year, have done this year.
 
I just wish he could handle a lead. I think the first step is closing out in close games and this year has been great.

I had a national show on last night on Sirius. They questioned Painter's sub patterns, but said as odd as it was to let Iowa State back in, his X's and O's were great, sometimes players don't execute. Interesting take.

The thing is, in the NCAA Tournament, leads don't mean a ton. Couple that with who we were playing - a team that went on big runs and had big comebacks throughout the year, it was bound to happen. I really think the Swanigan sub situation is being blown out of proportion. Iowa State had started coming back before Swanigan left, and they continued coming back after came back in.
 
I think the OP misses a bit of the larger picure here

rather than continuing to be a watchdog of other posters (who are likely just iu fans or 1 disgruntled pu fan with many usernames anyway),

we may need to continue to be the watchdog of the athletic dept, making sure mb2 is truly not mb1

with coaching changes occurring in conference and elsewhere in similar power five teams, painters salary rank can continue to decline

if we go as far as I think we can this year and also maintain a high program level, we better be prepared to pony up again big if you want to retain painter...
a substantial raise not just an extension like mb1 did
MBob will likely want to see how we do post-Biggie, how the 2018 class, shapes up, etc, before he renegotiates anything.
 
How great it is to see not only the team make it to the sweet 16 but also CMP to continue prove the negatwitts on here wrong time and time again.

It must really be bad for c3pr, boneheadfish, vagem, not4purdue and the couple other morons that post here against Painter right now since he continues to show how little they know and continue to do things his way and be successful and make those idiots look like fools in the process. And what is funny is I doubt even one of them will sack up and admit how wrong they were. But that is okay their credibility is shot on here regardless.

What a great day to not be a bandwagon fan like the negatwitts and have our support rewarded with a trip to the sweet 16!
Saw one of the analysts on CBS talk about how Purdue had 27 assists on 31 field goals and how that was a sign of an excellent coached team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rjmpu82
Just re watched the game. Swanigan was back in and we had a 12 point lead. We did not score on at least 3 straight possessions and ISU did. We had good looks, they did not go down. That is how the lead went away. Was not coaching. Was a miracle PJ's 3 went in. Painter does not sub with a minute or 2 to go. He stays with PJ and Cline and leaves CE on the bench. I personally like CE on the floor. And yes, PJ hit his 2 FF. Dakota bricked his, thank god for Swanigan's rebound. ISU is good and had really good talent not shocking they made their run. The bounce finally went our way.
 
I like how people are pointing out Iowa St big come back, it's like it never happens to any other team. Look at Northwesterns run where they were down by 22, cut it down to 5 (got screwed on a call) so Gonzaga should be roasted. We handle it and won.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PU pit bull and BBG
Hell we were down 12 to MD and won it on CE's FTs on their court. It happens when you're playing good teams. I actually think this helps us more going forward than a 20 point blowout.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HookmanBoiler
The issue with the substitution before the 12 minute mark wasn't that he wanted to get Biggie the extended minute or two of real time rest. Painter put in a lineup that he never plays together and sat there until the the TV timeout came. One of the things they were talking about earlier in the day was how college coaches use the TV timeouts as a crutch and allow momentum to swing in the other team's favor instead of using their own timeouts. It's not just that the bad lineup allowed a 7-0 run before Biggie was back in the game, it also gave ISU all of the momentum on the court and in the crowd. That's something that "in game coaches" seem to recognize and not allow. Hopefully he learned his lesson last night.
 
MBob will likely want to see how we do post-Biggie, how the 2018 class, shapes up, etc, before he renegotiates anything.

The thing many here don't consider is that there are other programs who would slobber down their shirts to get Painter. And some are ready to pay to get him. No, I have zero rumors or hearsay, but I can see his resume' as well as anyone else can.

And, it is amusing to see how those coaches that came up for discussion as good replacements for him last year, have done this year.

exactly, and we will see if and how long bobinski can wait.
some coaches receiving more pay do have a longer track record & better results, but others are receiving more $ just based on hope/potential.

just in conference, painter ranks barely above maryland and nebraska.
i would imagine gard will be receiving a nice bump soon as well, which could put purdue ranked 7th.

plus consider non conference peers like mizzou who already courted painter before, and are now paying 3m for martin (who apparently many here feel is overrated).
places like 'bama who don't prioritize basketball went after guys like a.johnson and are paying 2.8m.
plus smaller schools like wichita st paying 3.3m

big ten coach - salary
izzo 4.1
matta 3.4
crean (was) 3.1
underwood 3
beilein 2.8
painter 2.4
turgeon 2.3
miles 2.1
mccaffery 2
gard 1.8
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT