I’ve never understood why UL or Purdue fans use historical records or rankings as an argument for one or the other being a “better job”. Who cares what Purdue or Louisville did in 2009? Brohm likely doesn’t care one bit what the history of a program has looked like. If I was choosing to take a new job, why would I care what their margins or stock price was 10 years ago? Doesn’t matter.Can some explain to me where all of this Purdue superiority over Louisville or any other school for that matter has suddenly come from. I understand Brohm has lit a spark in the program the last couple of years but prior to that what has Purdue done on a national stage to talk like some sort of destination job. In just the last 10 years Purdue has a 39-67 overall record and and 20-54 in conference play. Louisville is #28 on the list of to 30 largest cities in America with a population of just over 650,000 and is a pure college town with no pro sports team while West Lafayette boast a population of just over 48,000. If Jeff stays good for Purdue and Louisville will be just fine but this talk that Purdue is superior because the program has some sort of life now under Brohm is ridiculous.
What does matter is the current state of each program and where he feels like he can best accomplish his goals. That answer is clearly Purdue.