Chump wants reparations for Jan 6 cop beaters

[Katscratch]

Correct. The FBI didn't admit to anything. That is why it was impossible for any of the defendants to get a fair trial.

FBI had 26 informants at Jan. 6 Capitol riots — and most were involved, bombshell DOJ report confirms

Leadership at the bureau had long been adamant that it did not have sources who “orchestrated” the riot. Questions about whether the FBI has informants involved in the riots were met wi…

nypost.com

We are talking apples and oranges.

Domestic terrorism informants who were tasked with reporting back? Geez; I would hope so.

These are not FBI Agents (not saying you stated they were).

It would be a severe dereliction of duty if the FBI did not have informants at that shit show train wreck of a domestic terrorism event in the making. Those are not people that in any way were able to stop what happened.

 

[BNIBoiler]

You don't even know that despite the NY Post article above?

I’ve said many times and y’all should know this. FBI agents and FBI informants are totally 2 different people. Informants are everyday folks and in this case part of the deplorables attacking the Capitol. These informants participated on their own accord. Even if they were working for the feds to get intel in the deplorables, they were not instructed to attack the Capitol by the FBI. Most informants are jacked up folks like anyone else. Just like the Black Panther informant that helped the FBI kill Fred Hampton while he was asleep.

 

[Riveting-]

We are talking apples and oranges.

Domestic terrorism informants who were tasked with reporting back? Geez; I would hope so.

You don't know what they were "tasked with."

These are not FBI Agents (not saying you stated they were).

You don't know that FBI agents were not there.

What you do know is that the FBI has a history of lying and withholding information.

It would be a severe dereliction of duty if the FBI did not have informants at that shit show train wreck of a domestic terrorism event in the making. Those are not people that in any way were able to stop what happened.

Well of course. They would have been there to encourage what happened, not to stop it.

 

[Riveting-]

I’ve said many times and y’all should know this. FBI agents and FBI informants are totally 2 different people. Informants are everyday folks and in this case part of the deplorables attacking the Capitol. These informants participated on their own accord. Even if they were working for the feds to get intel in the deplorables, they were not instructed to attack the Capitol by the FBI. Most informants are jacked up folks like anyone else. Just like the Black Panther informant that helped the FBI kill Fred Hampton while he was asleep.

Yes, you often repeat yourself.

Like KatCS, you mindlessly believe whatever the FBI tells you (or doesn't tell you) and what the MSN tells you. You have no idea what the informants were "instructed" to do by the FBI, nor how many FBI agents were there. The FBI Director refused to tell Congress that info - and Congress had no way to force him to, nor any desire to on the dem side because they saw Jan 6 as a great political opportunity.

 

[Katscratch]

You don't know what they were "tasked with."

You don't know that FBI agents were not there.

What you do know is that the FBI has a history of lying and withholding information.

Well of course. They would have been there to encourage what happened, not to stop it.

We don’t know what they were tasked with or that they were “not there“ is evidence of absolutely nothing.

You are now squarely into “trust me, bro“ territory.

 

[Riveting-]

We don’t know what they were tasked with or that they were “not there“ is evidence of absolutely nothing.

You are now squarely into “trust me, bro“ territory.

No, it is evidence that the FBI has proven it cannot be trusted to tell us the truth.

Did you sleep through "Operation Crossfire Hurricane"?

 

[Katscratch]

No, it is evidence that the FBI has proven it cannot be trusted to tell us the truth.

Did you sleep through "Operation Crossfire Hurricane"?

You just diverted with absolutely zero evidence about your J6 assertions.

Still holding at “trust me, bro.”

 

[BNIBoiler]

No, it is evidence that the FBI has proven it cannot be trusted to tell us the truth.

Did you sleep through "Operation Crossfire Hurricane"?

Do the ridiculously pardoned cop beating Flavor Aiders deserved to get reparations?

 

[SKYDOG]

Do the ridiculously pardoned cop beating Flavor Aiders deserved to get reparations?

Nobody on the planet should get reparations, as no one was harmed in any way. NONE!

 

[BNIBoiler]

Nobody on the planet should get reparations, as no one was harmed in any way. NONE!

Who was not harmed?

 

[Katscratch]

Nobody on the planet should get reparations, as no one was harmed in any way. NONE!

Reparations? Nope.

Civil lawsuit with contingency fee attorney representation to discourage frivolous suits? Go for it.

 

[bonefish1]

Ray Epps is my hero?!!? I never stated nor intimated any such thing.

LIAR.

YOU ARE REPEATEDLY LYING ON THIS BOARD.
I wanted to remind everyone of the message board policies provided by Rivals and focus on a few:

1: No attacking other posters. If you feel
the need to harass another poster, don't do it. What is
considered attacking other posters?

Bringing up their name in posts that they did not start
or were not involved in, just to get a reaction from them.
Consistently responding to their posts and responding
with no merit other than to belittle them.
In short, making a poster a target.

2: No repetitive negative posting. What
makes a repetitive post? If you come to the forum and consistently say
the exact same thing about the exact same topic day in and day out,
that is being repetitive. Be sure to understand that no one is saying
that you can not be critical. But this site will not be overrun by the
same people coming on the site day after day saying the same negative
things.

3: No flaming: If a poster come onto the
board with the intent only to flame, and continues to post nothing but
flames or engages in no substantive discussion, the poster's posts will
be deleted and the poster will be banned at the monitor's discretion.
.

quit being such a baby

 

[Riveting-]

You just diverted with absolutely zero evidence about your J6 assertions.

Still holding at “trust me, bro.”

Still holding at "trust the FBI, bro"?

Of course there is zero evidence. The FBI hid the evidence - just as they did in Crossfire Hurricane and countless other operations. Try not to be so childishly naive. That is bni's role.

 

[Riveting-]

Do the ridiculously pardoned cop beating Flavor Aiders deserved to get reparations?

Not reparations - and nor do you.

 

[Katscratch]

Still holding at "trust the FBI, bro"?

Of course there is zero evidence. The FBI hid the evidence - just as they did in Crossfire Hurricane and countless other operations. Try not to be so childishly naive. That is bni's role.

Agreed. Done and done.

 

[Riveting-]

Agreed. Done and done.

In your case, dumb and dumber.

 

[Katscratch]

In your case, dumb and dumber.

View embedded media

The Assistant Director clearly states at the start of the questioning that she will not reveal sources and methods in an open, public hearing. The FBI has clearly stated that they would, and has revealed sources and methods in closed hearings to the same committee.

Of course, you aren't linking the portions of those hearings where the FBI states that they will follow policy by only divulging sources and methods in closed hearings. Yet you fell for the theatrics.

Hey! Betcha one Donnie J. Trumperooski was an FBI informant on mob guys in NYC as a way of staying out of trouble in the 80's and 90's. But that also will not be divulged in open congressional hearings.

 

[Riveting-]

The FBI has clearly stated that they would, and has revealed sources and methods in closed hearings to the same committee.

How do you know the FBI did that?

 

[Katscratch]

How do you know the FBI did that?

Per published news reports that the same committee held closed hearings with FBI officials, including the WFO SAC.

 

[Riveting-]

Per published news reports that the same committee held closed hearings with FBI officials, including the WFO SAC.

The question was, how do you know the FBI revealed sources and methods in the closed hearings?

Only the FBI officials would know if they did, and they have lied before.

 

[Katscratch]

The question was, how do you know the FBI revealed sources and methods in the closed hearings?

Only the FBI officials would know if they did, and they have lied before.

People in a 40,000 employee agency have lied before?

That’s not a very insightful take.

 

[Riveting-]

People in a 40,000 employee agency have lied before?

That’s not a very insightful take.

Not 'people', but the leaders of the agency who speak to Congress.