Most coaches would start him. But why start him when he can score? Why would we want to score more points? We had 19 first half points. That's 9 baskets basically. For the entire first half. Whatever it was. Point being it was lousy. Why would anyone want Carson out there when only 8 baskets were out there and Purdue bigs looked like people watching magicians pull rabbits out of hats the balls disappeared from their hands so quick. The other team took the balls out of their hands before the knew the ball was gone and already scored and we're back on defense by the time Purdue realized that ball disappeared for much of the game. At that point why bring in Carson?
Carsen should be starting...
- Thread starter *4purdue*
- Start date
Most coaches would start him. But why start him when he can score? Why would we want to score more points? We had 19 first half points. That's 9 baskets basically. For the entire first half. Whatever it was. Point being it was lousy. Why would anyone want Carson out there when only 8 baskets were out there and Purdue bigs looked like people watching magicians pull rabbits out of hats the balls disappeared from their hands so quick. The other team took the balls out of their hands before the knew the ball was gone and already scored and we're back on defense by the time Purdue realized that ball disappeared for much of the game. At that point why bring in Carson?
Agree to disagree. I don't think anything hurts us more than Man D ! With Lousiville's shooting skills, we could have easily absorbed the turnovers. Dunks and freethrows are pretty high percentage shooting options and that doesn't even include our bigs going to the bench before the 10 minute mark.
Similar threads
