Commissioners are meeting. Absolutely no chance of being included when this eventually leads to a football merger…
No. And that’s fine with me.Commissioners are meeting. Absolutely no chance of being included when this eventually leads to a football merger…
The real issue is that the lion’s share of our tv revenue comes from conference football rights. Take that way & the Athletic Dept (and any University programs that also use these funds) is in trouble…Good. Let all the fan bases that think it's worth paying 18 year-olds six figures or more to play football separate from the rest of us.
True…but not fully. BIG basketball drives a decent revenue #. Without that, the BIG is not really on equal footing revenue wise with the SEC. If the basketball revenue was not on the table the BIGs negotiating power in any deal here is decreased greatly.The real issue is that the lion’s share of our tv revenue comes from conference football rights. Take that way & the Athletic Dept (and any University programs that also use these funds) is in trouble…
I'm ok with that. If college athletics have essentially become minor league sports, public institutions funded by taxpayer dollars really have no place in them anymore.The real issue is that the lion’s share of our tv revenue comes from conference football rights. Take that way & the Athletic Dept (and any University programs that also use these funds) is in trouble…
Not sure anyone really knows how this will impact schools long-term (especially non-revenue sports) but I don’t think you’re 100% wrong. All I know is that I’m glad that I got out of coaching years ago and don’t have to deal with this…I'm ok with that. If college athletics have essentially become minor league sports, public institutions funded by taxpayer dollars really have no place in them anymore.
As I've said, the super conference will be made up of contenders (top half) and wannabees (bottom half). I do NOT want to end up as a permanent whipping boy just for a payout. Purdue has one of the smallest amount of Olympic Sport teams out of any BT school (16?) MBB and non-super conference football can find a way to fund them. You can still have occasional "crossover" games with OSU, Michigan, whoever else ends up there (IMHO, they will be begging for them after a few years) but the majority of games played will be with peer schools...closer to home, more relevant and competitive.Good. Let all the fan bases that think it's worth paying 18 year-olds six figures or more to play football separate from the rest of us.
The polar opposite is true. Purdue is virtually guaranteed to be included, as are all other current Big Ten/SEC schools.Commissioners are meeting. Absolutely no chance of being included when this eventually leads to a football merger…
This is a frantic attempt by the M2 and the G6 to get some of that P2 TV money. I assume Greg Sankey and Tony Petitti have enough sense to ignore it.Seems like this group is throwing out stuff to see what sticks. I'd think the B1G working with the SEC will be more realistic, but could end up with something close to this group of 72.
We would be included.Commissioners are meeting. Absolutely no chance of being included when this eventually leads to a football merger…
My son just started his college coaching career. Like the military, it is not one I would recommend. Your job is totally dependent on the success of your athletes/students. In a short time he has already had his share of ultimate success and headaches. He’s a track coach and track is also affected by the NIL.Not sure anyone really knows how this will impact schools long-term (especially non-revenue sports) but I don’t think you’re 100% wrong. All I know is that I’m glad that I got out of coaching years ago and don’t have to deal with this…
The sec commissioner has already shot this down and basically said the sec won’t entertain propping up the lower P4 teams.I don't know if the proposed super league was discussed on here. Some group that has the owners of the bengals, and brewers etc and some others that have no control over college football released this last week. They're proposal breaks all conferences into regions with the g5 being 2nd tier that can play up to the group of 72. Seems like this group is throwing out stuff to see what sticks. I'd think the B1G working with the SEC will be more realistic, but could end up with something close to this group of 72.
Proposed college football 'Super League' details unveiled
College Sports Tomorrow has proposed streamlining college football into a 'Super League' called the College Student Football League (CSFL).fbschedules.com
I didn't see Sankey's comment. I assumed this group was proposing this from an venture capital position (ie lump sum payout to conference / university in exchange for media rights over a period of time). - I don't think there are any TV execs involved with it though.The sec commissioner has already shot this down and basically said the sec won’t entertain propping up the lower P4 teams.
This is a frantic attempt by the M2 and the G6 to get some of that P2 TV money. I assume Greg Sankey and Tony Petitti have enough sense to ignore it.
Washington State and Oregon State would love this.This is a frantic attempt by the M2 and the G6 to get some of that P2 TV money. I assume Greg Sankey and Tony Petitti have enough sense to ignore it.
I prefer we get a head coach and get better.What I don’t see in the development of a super conference is the addition of teams Purdue would be able to beat. The big 10 will add elite teams, not bottom feeders.
This begs the question: would 0purdue fans look forward to a future of always being one of the bottom 4 teams? Or would they prefer to join a lesser conference where their teams could actually compete?
People who make comments like that almost invariably have no military service.My son just started his college coaching career. Like the military, it is not one I would recommend.
Correct sec already said it ain’t happening. B1G and SEC are on the drivers seat here. Likely a lot of fear mongering going on but my hunch is they will manipulate espn into folding the acc and squashing the B12 and will get favorable tv schedule, elite matchups between the two conferences, and an upper hand in the playoff teams like was proposed last year where each conference gets 4 automatic bids with byes and everyone else will fight over the last 4-6 at large bids (they were proposing a 14 team playoff last year). I don’t think either conference will change in membership 5 except acc. ESPN controls acc destiny.This is a frantic attempt by the M2 and the G6 to get some of that P2 TV money. I assume Greg Sankey and Tony Petitti have enough sense to ignore it.
I bet Vanderbilt’s glad they didn’t quit the sec like a lot of people suggested.What I don’t see in the development of a super conference is the addition of teams Purdue would be able to beat. The big 10 will add elite teams, not bottom feeders.
This begs the question: would 0purdue fans look forward to a future of always being one of the bottom 4 teams? Or would they prefer to join a lesser conference where their teams could actually compete?
That sounds like something an Army Colonel would say! Air Force Colonels have a different take on their military service. Military service is a sacrifice, not something to be taken lightly.People who make comments like that almost invariably have no military service.
Colin Meyer
Colonel, US Army (ret.)
I’ll bet Vanderbilt fans are not looking forward to the SEC becoming a mega 24 team conference!I bet Vanderbilt’s glad they didn’t quit the sec like a lot of people suggested.