ADVERTISEMENT

If you have 2 QBs, then you don't really have one

KentuckyBoiler

All-American
Jul 6, 2011
15,307
21,677
113
Now, Walters is wanting to use a 2 QB system, no matter who starts. We have all heard, if you have 2 QBs, then you don't really have 1 QB.

The QBs are going to be conservative with their play, because they know that they can be pulled at any time. He is grasping for straws at this point. We need to go with Browne. He is young and he is an underclassman. He has the best legs of the 2 QBs, and he can create with his legs and scrambling. With our OL and no WRs to speak of, he gives us the best chance to stay somewhat competitive in the game, meaning not losing by 30 points in every game.
 
I remember when Tom Brady was part of a 2 qb platoon at Michigan. They would switch every other quarter. The other Qb was the more heralded QB.

Part of the problem was the team would lose momentum with the change of QBs when on a drive.

The other qb did make it to the pros. He actually was good. But it was a bad idea to platoon the two Qbs
 
Now, Walters is wanting to use a 2 QB system, no matter who starts. We have all heard, if you have 2 QBs, then you don't really have 1 QB.

The QBs are going to be conservative with their play, because they know that they can be pulled at any time. He is grasping for straws at this point. We need to go with Browne. He is young and he is an underclassman. He has the best legs of the 2 QBs, and he can create with his legs and scrambling. With our OL and no WRs to speak of, he gives us the best chance to stay somewhat competitive in the game, meaning not losing by 30 points in every game.
lol. This is like blaming a pimple on Holly Roe’s ass for the reason she looks like miss piggy. Walters is a terrible head coach plain and simple.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT