Are you better off today than in 2021?
- Thread starter TheGunner
- Start date
So are you claiming that a group of FBI whistleblowers is hearsay? I thought hearsay was second hand testimony, not first.
No I’m not saying that—I feel like for once we are in complete agreement. Your definition of hearsay is pretty good, and it is not hearsay if they, as agents, had first hand knowledge of misconduct.
But, at this point we have absolutely no idea what they are saying. Those whistleblowers could’ve been decision makers at headquarters, and therefore in an absolute, direct position to know about misconduct, or they could’ve been shagging bank robbery leads in New Mexico, and mad about something they had no involvement in. Or those whistleblowers may be mad about how bank robberies are handled in New Mexico.
At this point we have no idea who or on what subject there are whistleblowers. The FBI has over 20,000 employees and many whistleblowers every year. Always has. So does every other large police organization like the NYPD, DEA, Chicago PD, etc
Can we agree on that too?
Last edited:
Sure you do, Jr. If so, why didn't you admit that Trump was a better president that LBJ and his pointless, deadly war?
Why the feels for LBJ? Are you just as disgusted by Ike, JFK, and Nixon?
What about Lincoln? That was the most deadly war for American soldiers and he was in office when it started.
This is weird as hell; you are so very disconnected to reality that you are dying on the hill of “the 3rd of 4 Vietnam War Presidents is therefore the worst President ever.”
You continue to self-own by exposing your own lunacy.
Last edited:
By the way, do you know which administration had the most Vietnam War Casualties? It’s Nixon and not that close
Now watch his LBJ is the worst theory was a complete, refuted, loser— here comes the “I’ve been owned again” topic switch by @Riveting-
“Oh yeah—well whattaboutism Joe, Hunter, Hillary, FBi, Police State, George W?”
Here. It. Comes.
“Oh yeah—well whattaboutism Joe, Hunter, Hillary, FBi, Police State, George W?”
Here. It. Comes.
Oh yeah - well whattabout the word 'started' in my posts on LBJ that said he started a stupid, senseless war that resulted in 55,000 US Troops killed, hundreds of thousands of Asians killed, and massive suffering.
Whatabout the others you listed? Only one of them started a stupid war, which turned out to be not as deadly as the stupid war LBJ started, but still deadly to those of us who do not consider a million deaths to be a statistic like you do, Uncle Joe Jr.
Whatabout all that death and suffering, Jr?
LBJ was not President when that war started. Ike was. Then that war continued under JFK. Then LBJ. Then Nixon.
Learn your history
Says the guy who thinks Trump was the worst president of the last 150 years.
The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution pushed through by LBJ in 1964 legalized America's full-scale involvement in the Vietnam War. It was the start of our tragic and senseless direct military involvement.
I don’t ‘think’
Trump was a historically notable disaster.
I KNOW it.
You are really still taken with the Vietnam War in 2023. I sincerely hope you or your loved ones weren’t directly affected by that horrendous war.
What did Trump do that you think you know made him a historically notable disaster?
Energy independence, increased border security, crushing ISIS, Abraham accords, record low black unemployment rates, ect? Or was it the mean tweets and crude comments?
Energy independence? Say whaaaat? About the same
Increased border security? Saaaay what? About the same
Crushed ISIS? Say whaaaat? About the same as when it went well under Obama. Collectively those two administrations did well
Abraham Accords? A++++ by the Trump administration
Record low black unemployment? Even better now with Biden, and besides—I am tired of that pansy-ass liberal bullshit measuring employment in terms of skin color.
The inspiration and support for overthrowing the USG? Yikes . That’s all Trump
Ted, could you draw on the wide worldview you have gained from your deep reading of Goofus and Gallant to translate what HoosierHysteria is struggling to say (if anything) into something higher than elementary school babble? @TeddyValentineDidNothingWrong
Keep in mind that H2 is known for unbalanced views, such as that responsibility for causing massive death and suffering is not important in assessing a president's record.
You may want to consult with Bob as needed on the translation.
It is best that you don't try to speak for yourself, as we've seen the results, so posting things you find on the internet is a good first step.
Let's wait now to see if Ted can help you with his wide worldview. I have my doubts, but it is worth a try as he may be the only person on the forum who can translate your childish gibberish.
1) You still cannot come up ONE SINGLE EMAIL that is damaging in any way.
2) This response from you is a doozy. You call everyone by some childish insulting name, you are confusing, confused, and unstable—“Goofus and Gallant” What the hell does that even mean?
3) You somehow think that people who don’t appreciate your man-crush, Orange-porn daydream Donald Trump are responsible for “massive death and suffering.”
Congratulations—you have been trying so hard, and you have now completely achieved maximum idiocy.
You apparently haven't followed Ted closely enough to know, which is surprising since he is your cognitive soul mate.
Please, no more lashing out with your trademark blend of anger, hysteria and incoherence. Give Ted a chance to help you as a last resort. Otherwise, we will need to send you back to your native clownpants forum, where you can be with your own kind.
I have no idea, nor do I care who “Ted” is.
You promised emails of “police state” misconduct that led to an unfair election.
STILL no emails.
None
And Trump knew about Ukraine and Hunter.
Poor Rudy got crucified for doing the FBI's job.
Annnnddddd:
The secret is out. The three FBI whistleblowers are:
- A suspended agent from Wichita, Kansas who's complaint was that (and I quote Fox News), "The FBI made him divide one domestic terrorism case into "four different cases," in what he described as an effort by the bureau to be able to show Congress an influx of domestic terrorism cases. O’Boyle said the FBI wanted agents to "look into" what the bureau called "pregnancy centers." "Like, the antithesis to abortion clinics. Whatever those are called," he said. O’Boyle said he was confused as to why agents would need to "talk to these people about threats.""If somebody is going to be getting threatened, it would be them, because people thought that abortion was suddenly outlawed, which, that wasn’t the case either, it was just remanded back to the states," he said, adding that the assignment "struck me as odd at the time." O’Boyle said he later was given a "request for collection," and was instructed to ask his confidential human source, who he said was pro-life, "a bunch of questions about the threats to the Supreme Court." "And even when I got that, I was like, why would this person know about those threats? He’s pro-life," O’Boyle continued. "Like, he’s not the one going and threatening the Supreme Court justices." O'Boyle was never involved in any management decision making or had access to agency policy.
- The fired SWAT Agent from Daytona Beach, Florida who refused to participate in a dangerous arrest because the arrest warrant was for a January 6th insurrectionist, and
- A fired analyst from Boston, who stated that Bank of America volunteered information to the Bureau about Jan5th-7th purchases of firearms by people who were at the Capitol on January 6th.
Good lord.
Three of what, 20?
Who blew the whistle on FBI corruption in the Russian collusion hoax?
Those are the only three that the congressional committee has admitted to actually exist so far.
Can you give me anything from anyone else?
I was asking you, since you were hysterical, if that is all the whistleblowers lined up to testify - or just the three that dems did the usual hatchet job on.
Who blew the whistle on this guy?
Former FBI official charged with violating Russia sanctions, money laundering
Charles McGonigal, who retired from the FBI in 2018, is accused in a five-count indictment of working for Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska.
www.cbsnews.com
Great question!I was asking you, since you were hysterical, if that is all the whistleblowers lined up to testify - or just the three that dems did the usual hatchet job on.
Who blew the whistle on this guy?
Former FBI official charged with violating Russia sanctions, money laundering
Charles McGonigal, who retired from the FBI in 2018, is accused in a five-count indictment of working for Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska.
No one blew the whistle on him. He is a criminal who was investigated by the FBI.
Kind of seems like when the FBI finds actual evidence of criminal misconduct, they pursue to the fullest extent of the law, eh?
Your problem here is that some biased politicians dangle the number 20 whistleblowers in front of you without providing any evidence. So far, the first three are whistleblowers that didn’t know jack shit.
Is it possible that one of the other 17 have something of value to say? Sure!
Until there is evidence of somebody that wasn’t in Wichita, Kansas in a non-decision making capacity saying something of value, you are biting like a big fat hungry fish but there’s no worm on the line.
Is it possible that one of the other 17 have something of value to say? Sure!
Until there is evidence of somebody that wasn’t in Wichita, Kansas in a non-decision making capacity saying something of value, you are biting like a big fat hungry fish but there’s no worm on the line.
Consistently only in the FBI shows you watch.
To what extent has the FBI pursued those who offered Steele 1M to verify the fake dossier, then went ahead and used it anyway when he couldn't?
Similar threads
