ADVERTISEMENT

Anyone catch the analyst being far less than impressed by Blough

BoilermakerD

All-American
Apr 18, 2010
4,976
1,135
113
"Coach Hazell says one thing, and then you turn on the film and you realize why they're taking the ball out of his hands."

You start there. Then, if you're being objective/not a "he's my guy" poster (you can go back to Kirsch v. Orton 02 if you'd like), you look at the box score from Wisconsin at Purdue last year and realize that Appleby threw for more yards and one more TD last year v. a better Wisconsin team than Blough did today.

My stance isn't that Appleby is necessarily better. It's that... with these idiots, we'd never know. Do you think pro scouts could watch film of these two in SHOOP's offense and tell you who is better, or if either is any good at all?

The first thing they'd say is, "how the hell would I know.. you have receivers lined up behind tackles with a guy motioning diagonally backwards... run by a coach whose ideal scenario is 3rd and 9 with the whole world knowing he's passing."

What I am willing to say is that it's a bad look for Purdue. A school who is not recruiting has a guy who was elite 11 waiting his turn, only to be benched for a guy who only looked better than him for one game?

And why was the analyst talking like that? Because for every Drew Brees there's the 99% of other guys who just don't function well on few starts/little experience.

When a kid doesn't turn his homework in, and ends up being a D student.. do we let him into Purdue? No. He goes to junior college and maybe gets himself to a nice school.

However, our reaction to these idiots clearly not preparing a team to function at the Big Ten level, or even beat American conference/MAC schools is, "sure, give yourself a shot in the arm with a QB who will only look good for one game, only to then be left out there way before he's ready."

The saddest part. How much do you want to bet that Blough, should he continue to just look completely not ready, which he's not... suddenly gets "hurt" and Appleby ends up out there anyway in week 11...?

How would you like to be that kid and wonder if you would have had an actual shot with a competent coaching staff, but end up embarrassed cause someone else is an idiot.
 
And that's fine ... But the point still remains. How is this going any better than it went for etling
 
And that's fine ... But the point still remains. How is this going any better than it went for etling

I disagree that he's not ready. We (Purdue) continue to live in '85 and think all Freshmen need to become Redshirt Juniors before they can be effective. Blough made the most out of the 3-4 throws he was allowed. You try to get into a rythm, as an inexperiences QB, when you throw once every 15-20 downs.

But, I agree with everything else. Shoop is a total CF, and CDH is just WAY over his head.

Can we fire them please? I have CAUSE. It's because they're embarrassing Purdue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pb1941
After seeing the trend of QBs starting off pretty good (Etling, Appleby, Blough) and then digressing, I think the problem isn't with the kids. It's with the staff. Yesterday's game plan where we "pared down the play book" implies Blough couldn't handle it very well, but in fact it is an INDICTMENT on how bad the coaching is. The coaching needs to be creative enough to work with the talent they have and not pare down anything. They need to find plays that work - not go into hermit mode.
 
Matt Millen is about as good at scouting talent as Ryan Grigson. Don't they both draft style over team needs? I understand what you are saying but it is Matt Millen.
Matt Millen? How is he any expert? Look what he did to the poor Detroit Lions.
 
So what are you guys saying? Because Millen is a moron blough looked good yesterday? Two things can be true simultaneously
 
Matt Millen is about as good at scouting talent as Ryan Grigson. Don't they both draft style over team needs? I understand what you are saying but it is Matt Millen.

Ryan Grigson has built a team that has never missed the playoffs in his tenure. There are plenty of good talent he has picked.
 
The issue with Blough and his regression is that he is a mobile QB that is known to be able to make plays while outside of the pocket (look at the one TD Purdue scored last week) yet Shoop has him standing in the pocket for most of his throws. The same could be said for Appleby and having him run the read option as a 6'5 240 pound QB with limited mobility. It is almost as if Shoop thinks: "Hey, they would never expect me to make Appleby run the option, so that's what I'll do!" It's just idiocy to take a player's strengths, remove or limit them from the game plan, and then force that player to work on his weaknesses in a game. It would be like making AJ Hammons play on the perimeter and forcing him to take his man off the dribble.
 
I said shoop would do just that and people probably read it with the whole hyperbole chuckle ... I was serious.

Rob Henry could run too and he made him be a pocket passer
 
I gave Shoop three weeks to ruin Blough.
Shoop exceeded my expectations and did it in two!
 
So what are you guys saying? Because Millen is a moron blough looked good yesterday? Two things can be true simultaneously
Millen said that he thought Blough had a good future. However, he kept saying 1) the coaching staff was asking too much of him which was the reason he thought for the extremely conservative game plan and 2) Blough need to work on his footwork and especially not throwing off of his back foot.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT