But, this from the party of tolerance? Oy gevalt!
https://theintercept.com/2016/07/22...ernie-sanderss-religious-beliefs-against-him/
https://theintercept.com/2016/07/22...ernie-sanderss-religious-beliefs-against-him/
And Bernie Will Still Endorse Hillary
- Thread starter TOKenBoiler
- Start date
it was one guy, or possibly two if you believe the back and forth. There are idiots/zealots in every organization. Can you point me to any evidence where it actually ended up happening?
Just wait until Bernie finds out that the DNC was playing with a stacked deck. Maybe a run as a third party candidate?
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/emai...-hillary-clinton/story?id=40815253&yptr=yahoo
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/emai...-hillary-clinton/story?id=40815253&yptr=yahoo
Qaz was right, it was the work of idiots/zealots, the DNC leadership at multiple levels. Sanders is standing in the way of the annointed one.
actually no, for better or worse for them, they got on-board pretty early on in the process...and were apparently neutral earlier than that (perhaps because they didn't think he could pull it off).
Ah the old spell check fail. Anyway, in some states yes the voters anointed her, other states no. Then again, a few states voted a majority for Bernie and the super delegates "anointed" otherwise.
Curious which states you feel the delegates or super delegates truly altered the outcome of the popular vote. As an example: there was lots of media drama over Delegates in NV. However, Clinton won the NV primary popular vote 52.6 to 47.3%. So the argument there was about proportional fairness, not the countermand of the popular vote.
Last edited:
if it were a spell check fail I would have purposefully misspelled the word and then put it in quotes instead of spelling it correctly. No the fail was the use of a silly word for a process where there was an actual election where millions of people voted and millions picked one person over the other.
If elected will Hillary be able to get security clearance?
If she was a anyone other than HRC my guess would be no.
so you think the President has to undergo a background check to be given a clearance? Interesting theory.
Actual election? The Good Ole Boy (and Girl) Superdelegates had nothing to do with it?
You do know that the Superdelegates don't actually cast their first and only vote until this week at the convention.
Scratch that, I am sure Alex jones and Newsmax will explain everything to you in due time.
Qaz, of course shell get clearance, it's HRC. But if you did what she did you'd be kicked out of the military and you damn sure know it. You would not get security clearance and might even be in jail. But HRC is subject to none of the above. Have you ever wondered why?
I wouldn't be in jail, most likely I'd have a GO letter of reprimand, a poor eval, and then probably retire. Of course, the military isn't politics, and the public can decide if they care sooooo much about this that they don't elect her...just like my supervisors could decide whether to kick me out or not.
qaz, are you an active duty uniformed member of one the military services, or are you a DOD civilian employee? Or maybe a DOD civilian and also a reservist?
I'm the former, and everything I said is true, and of anyone on this board, I'm in the position to know of what your average punishment is for your average Joe.
