3/30 Biden
- Thread starter atlboiler2156
- Start date
IMO the Dems will cause more damage to their party than their impeachment exercise if they politicize the CV19 issue by pushing a commission lead by Adam S. There is plenty of blame on both sides on this issue. Not a good look to be talking about launching a commission while we are in the middle of a pandemic . Just exposes the Dems motives of inflicting as much damage to Trump before the election.Very, very serious people. Very serious. Say cheese!
Especially when you take into consideration the “solution” they are offering for the Trump problem. They’re All-in with 10 High...
Lol no. You got it wrong. Trump dealt with both. The virus and impeachment at same time. The travel restriction was put in place during impeachment. It was others (you know, dems) that could not.
It will not happen this election cycle, BUT much like the limit on the young age of 35, there might be a upper end limit that SHOULD be considered...say 70? Not a Dem fan in this cycle, but to have both candidates above 75 is bad. Whoever their DNC Chairperson is should have been wise to not have two finalists at ages of 77 and 78 years old respectively. Find a way to cut the legs out from under one of them.
Trump is 73 and by the time his 2nd term will end he'll be 78 years old. That is no different than Ronald Reagan at 70 being elected going to age 78 and there were plenty of signs of dementia near the latter part of his 2nd term. The types of Medical issues are clearly part of our National Security. Why would the US Election Process not adjust to lessons learned?
Please.
If Mitt Romney is your "starter" for your list of Republicans less conservative than JFK.....
Then your "starter" needs to be your "ender" .
That's for sure.
Crazyville.
What did the people involved in the Impeachment of, and in the trial of Donald Trump have to do with the multitude of public health officials in the EXECUTIVE BRANCH of government ?? THOSE are the people responsible for dealing with a viral pandemic, that would need their expertise and leadership !!
NOT the members of the House Intelligence & House Judiciary committees and their staffs and legal representatives , who were involved in a completely different UNIVERSE of governmental function !
Have you ever heard of the Department of Health & Human Services ?
Have you ever heard of the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention ?
Were any of the Trump Administration employees in THOSE departments indisposed during the Impeachment process ? No ?? Then CONGRESSIONAL Democrats should share the blame for this Administration's questionable early response to COVID-19 ? Hell no.
Nice try.
Donald Trump not as conservative as John Fitzgerald Kennedy ?? !!
BSIT......good thing your Sanity Hearing isn't scheduled for this afternoon.....if that were the case, you might as well have brought your packed suitcase with you to the courtroom......
Yeah, everybody knows that.
But that's someone who ACTUALLY changed from one Party to the other. Legitimately because of a change in politics/governmental philosophies. So did Reagan. Same reasons.
John Kennedy did NOT change his views of politics AFTER HE DIED !! His lifelong record of holding Democratic principles closely WILL NOT be changed by history re-writers, circa 2020, on the Right.
They have a better chance trying to elevate Dick Nixon's legacy.
Believe it or not, some of Bill Clinton’s policies are probably more conservative than Trump’s. Not disputing JFK’s legacy or record. My parents loved him. However the Democratic Party has went away from JFK policies.
That family member of mine who I've mentioned knowing Biden personally who did a lot of work on Air Force One loved Billy. And he's about as conservative as it gets. Loved him and his policies, regardless of party name/affiliation.
Sixty years makes it a little difficult to make a number of accurate "policy" comparisons in American politics. But the basics of civil rights for ALL and of prioritizing the health & welfare of the poor and disadvantaged remain intact after all of these decades.
And the dividing lines on those horizons remain clear, between the two Parties.
House Intelligence receives Intel briefs. The same place/sources the President gets his briefs from. They were not involved in completely different Universe of govt function as you put it. One put up a travel ban, the others cried racism/xenophobia and tried to impeach him, failed, and then a month later yelled at him for not doing anything. Oh, and some others from both partiessold stocks as well, my bad, forgot that one.
What has changed is today’s Dems are more aligned with the ultra rich than ever before while the Republicans are appealing more to the working class recently. Trump IMO has reactivated Reagan’s Blue Dog Dems.
On a side note, I’m attaching a link of a great economist who supported JFK’s tax policies and was part of the Reagan administration and who voted for Bill Clinton twice and now supports Trump. Things come full circle
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Laffer
Democrats are the ones aligned with the ultra rich, while Republicans are working for the working class? Are you high? That couldn't be more wrong. Republicans are cutting taxes for the wealthy, cutting regulations that impact the wealthy. Look at the CFPB, an agency that actually helps regular people, Republicans want it destroyed. The entire Republican economic argument is that helping the richest become more wealthy means money trickles down to others. There's absolutely no evidence for that, but that's what they believe. That's why every Republican economic endeavor is geared toward the people at the top.
I agree with this. I am center leaning right but actually voted for Billy. The democrat party is not the same.
Actually I think there may be even more Dems on WS too. I do hope Nancy P will be successful in sneaking the SALT deduction back into law. Will make me happier and wealthier. She is trying to help out her rich liberal friends
Members of Congress selling stocks ? Completely separate subject.
How much more clearly can it be expressed when pointing out that the LEGISLATIVE BRANCH of government has NO responsibility whatsoever in handling a pandemic , as we've been witnessing ??
Whether or not some members of Congress were criticizing the response of the Executive Branch and its President IS BESIDE THE POINT ! If they were CONGRATULATING the Exec. Branch it would be BESIDE THE POINT !
You failed to contradict one single point in the statement that the thousands of federal employees that become involved in public health crises ARE ALL part of the departments and agencies of the Exec. Branch. NONE of whom spent any time/energy on the Impeachment !!
Trump deserves both credit and criticism. However , governors and state officials shouldn’t be immune from criticism too. Running out of supplies is not all on Trump and neither being late to the game as far as enacting stay at home orders. Case in point, look at the difference between California and NY. Governor Gavin Newsom was ahead of the curve to his credit
I have some time today-lets start from square one. Do House and Senate Intel Committee members reserve intel reports? Yes or no? Did they work on impeachment instead of focusing on the intel from China? Yes or no? Did they attack the President, critique for his travel ban, support him, or work with him to develop a plan? Select two. Were the executive branches request for a spending bill met quickly or delayed by private interest by a certain individual? Choose one.
No responsibility whatsover handling a pandemic? Tell that to Pelosi who established some bs panel subponea power for some reason. Says it is for oversight except that was already built into bill.
Well....had your parents not had sex.......
Square One:
***Describe in excruciating detail, if you would.....WHAT KEPT THE US PUBLIC HEALTH COMMUNITY FROM THE INTEL FROM CHINA ??
Answer: not one damn thing. Please resist the temptation to blame SOME Congressional members from keeping the Executive Branch's staff from giving the intel on COVID-19 the atterntion that it deserved.
*** Square Two: How in the hell can the usual Washington partisan yakity-yak keep anybody from doing their jobs in the Public Health Sector ??
*** Square Three: Exactly which Democratic members of Congress would be charged with "work(ing) with the President to "develop a plan" ?? There's an entire Health & Human Services Dept. that reports to the President through its Secretary, to consult. The CDC ? Those people don't have squat to do with Congress and its staffers in working with the President & his team in fighting the pandemic.
*** The Two Trillion $$ Stimulus Package had WHAT to do with actual coronavirus preparations, decisions, and responsibilities of people like Dr. Fauci and Dr. Blix ?? Whether or not the Dem. House leadership "delayed" for 24 hrs. the Stimulus Bill, had only to do with the negotiations involving the financial help that corporations were to benefit from, and the attendant details of such. If you want to argue the politics of THAT, fine. But it didn't have a damn thing to do with providing $$ for the actual medical side of it - the spending bill for which was done without hassle, some time back.
Exactly case in point wearing facemasks. Trump and Cuomo have essentially said the exact same thing over last day about wearing masks.
CNN - Gloria Borger- "A stunning lack of clarity by President Trump on guideline of wearing masks"
CNN has not offered a single criticism of Cuomo on masks or anything else. I get that Chris Cuomo works for CNN, but why the double standard? Both Trump and Cuomo have made some good decisions and some bad decisions.
Last edited:
We would have one less snowflake
Do you even read the sh!t you post or just keep pounding away to see how many words you can post for the day?
Ageism is the stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination against people on the basis of their age. ... Overlooked for employment, restricted from social services and stereotyped in the media, ageism marginalizes and excludes older people in their communities.
In other words....Somebody is calling Ken Nunn and The Hammer.
Indy, even for you that's over the top. CVirus is not a joking matter.
Look at your post that I responded to. What, you don’t want to believe Limbaugh? Is this the only time he was outright lying? All the rest of the time he was right on the money, but with this is when he chooses to be completely unhinged? I was just going off of someone that you trust and believe.
You were not going off. You were being sick and demented and punitive at the worst level and your post was uncalled for.
Similar threads
