Rittenhouse is a true American hero.
In addition to this, are we allowed to protect ourselves anymore. We are rapidly losing our rights for most everything.
www.nbcnewyork.com
This is one of the many reasons why there is a mass exodus from democrat run cities.In addition to this, are we allowed to protect ourselves anymore. We are rapidly losing our rights for most everything.
Murder or Self-Defense? New Video Shows NYC Bodega Clerk Stab Man to Death
A clerk for a New York City bodega was charged with killing a man who attacked him behind the counter, but those who support him say that new surveillance video showing the shocking incident could help the worker be cleared of charges.
Yes, I saw that case as well. Old man gets assaulted behind the counter where he works by a young guy so he defends himself with some kind of blade and now he's being charged with murder. The left is literally insane! INSANE!In addition to this, are we allowed to protect ourselves anymore. We are rapidly losing our rights for most everything.
Murder or Self-Defense? New Video Shows NYC Bodega Clerk Stab Man to Death
A clerk for a New York City bodega was charged with killing a man who attacked him behind the counter, but those who support him say that new surveillance video showing the shocking incident could help the worker be cleared of charges.
Then you have this story. Protestors break into the property of this couple, so they get their gun and tell the trespassers to leave their property and now the couple is being charged with a felony. For protecting their own property. They didn't even hurt anyone!In addition to this, are we allowed to protect ourselves anymore. We are rapidly losing our rights for most everything.
Murder or Self-Defense? New Video Shows NYC Bodega Clerk Stab Man to Death
A clerk for a New York City bodega was charged with killing a man who attacked him behind the counter, but those who support him say that new surveillance video showing the shocking incident could help the worker be cleared of charges.
www.reuters.com
Leftys, libs and dems always give the benefit of the doubt to the perps. They don't believe in personal responsibility or consequences for one's actions. They're the party of "lack of impulse control". After all, most of the people committing these crimes are supposedly oppressed, so the perps get the benefit of the doubt.Then you have this story. Protestors break into the property of this couple, so they get their gun and tell the trespassers to leave their property and now the couple is being charged with a felony. For protecting their own property. They didn't even hurt anyone!
St. Louis couple indicted for brandishing guns at protesters
A St. Louis, Missouri grand jury on Tuesday indicted a couple with unlawful use of a weapon and tampering with evidence, more than three months after they brandished guns at protesters marching outside their home, their attorney said.
Some context on that statement might be appropriate.......especially before you go applying it to other random situations.
If she brought the gun with her across state lines with the express purpose of confronting that man, then yes. That's murder.
No that is how permits work. And if the state has reciprocating rules in place, then carrying across state lines isn't illegal either.
As usual, y’all twist stuff around to f dry it your narrative. You said that the protesters broke into the property. They did no such thing. They walked down the street in front of their home but not on their property on their way to some specific destination. That is when the couple brandished the gun unlawfully.Then you have this story. Protestors break into the property of this couple, so they get their gun and tell the trespassers to leave their property and now the couple is being charged with a felony. For protecting their own property. They didn't even hurt anyone!
St. Louis couple indicted for brandishing guns at protesters
A St. Louis, Missouri grand jury on Tuesday indicted a couple with unlawful use of a weapon and tampering with evidence, more than three months after they brandished guns at protesters marching outside their home, their attorney said.
Actually it was a private street in a gated community. They broke the gate and trespassed to get onto the property. The street they were “protesting” on was private property. That’s a crime and I would be interested if any of the protesters were prosecuted by the George Soros-funded St. L DA who had refused to prosecute people who actually pull triggers and shoot people yet goes after a couple who did neither with such aggressiveness.
I believe you left out a minor detail; the road was in a gated community, not a public road, and the gate into the community was broken into by the mob.
“Y’all twist stuff around to f dry it your narrative?” The lack of food and water in Bidenville has you hallucinating at this point.
Stop getting your news from the ladies of The View. If you watched the trial you would know that he did not transport the gun across state lines and multiple video and eye witness accounts show the career convicted pedo chased him.
If I'm not mistaken, they didn't point the gun at anyone, fire any warning shots or even come off their porch?
Yep, you are a racist. 1st, you assume that they all were black. A loud mob as you say. You can bet there were several Antifa members in that mob and they are mostly white.
You’re so lost. Have some pride and stop being so unintelligent. Do you enjoy embarrassing yourself?
1. Th mob did break into the property. They busted the gate to enter PRIVATE property. That is a crime. How many were prosecuted by the George Soros-funded DA?
You just name called here so you’re calling yourself immature this morning. You’re the ideal Democrat voter and dumber than a speed bump. Good lord it’s hard to read your posts.
Who crossed state lines with a gun?
The argument by the prosecution was one sentence?
PROTESTERS?.....You & your party cant distinguish between protesting & RIOTING.
WRONG. Read the article I linked here. First of all, I never said they broke down the gate. I said they broke in. There's a difference. You can break in to someone's home without "breaking" something.
www.bbc.com
Sure, go ahead. Show us the context in which was missing. Please, if you're going to make this argument, then prove it. I always do.
And when he’s proven wrong, he doesn’t care. He’s on to the next lie to believe.WRONG. Read the article I linked here. First of all, I never said they broke down the gate. I said they broke in. There's a difference. You can break in to someone's home without "breaking" something.
Now, the protesters were 100% on private property. They weren't just walking down the street. I don't care how you slice it. If the gate was wide open, they still were trespassing.
"Most legal analysts agree that the protesters were trespassing when they entered Portland Place."
Mark and Patricia McCloskey: What really went on in St Louis that day?
A US couple gained instant notoriety for waving guns at protesters. What really happened that day?
You getting your facts so wrong on literally EVERYTHING shows how the media you listen to twists everything around.
Oh I know, he keeps pushing the voter ID laws were started because of Obama lie so many times it's going on full tard. I've given him the facts about that over and over, but he refuses to listen. Just can't let go of the racism narrative.
Yeah, it’s kinda sad that Purdue has somebody associated with it that’s as ignorant and arrogant as him. He does not and will not acknowledge when he’s wrong. Stubborn and stupid.
YOU are starting a thread with a statement with no link whatsoever.......and basing your argument on that statement.
“You” is used eight times here. YOU have a nice and relaxing Sunday, Bob.
Gotta love the hypocritical brilliance of @BuilderBob6 on a Sunday afternoon
YOU are right. How about you follow your own advice? Lol isn’t it funny how he demands a link now for every statement made that he doesn’t agree with? He seems to have the emotional maturity of a teen.
Your party is the one calling the Jan 6 insurrectionists “tourists”. Another fool said that they stood behind the rope.
If you read my post I never disputed whether walking down the street is private property. I reckon it belongs to the association. The private property I’m talking about is the property the couple owns like their lawn walkway, porch etc. The protestors, rioters, whatever you want to call them did not go up to the house that the couple owns. That is where the couple got into trouble is that you can’t point guns, which they clearly did, at folks according to the local laws. Therefore, take this discussion up with the city, county, or state law makers. Either way, the couple were in the wrong. If they weren’t, they would not have been charged.WRONG. Read the article I linked here. First of all, I never said they broke down the gate. I said they broke in. There's a difference. You can break in to someone's home without "breaking" something.
Now, the protesters were 100% on private property. They weren't just walking down the street. I don't care how you slice it. If the gate was wide open, they still were trespassing.
"Most legal analysts agree that the protesters were trespassing when they entered Portland Place."
Mark and Patricia McCloskey: What really went on in St Louis that day?
A US couple gained instant notoriety for waving guns at protesters. What really happened that day?
You getting your facts so wrong on literally EVERYTHING shows how the media you listen to twists everything around.
By definition, they weren’t insurrectionists but as we all know, you’re unintelligent and like talking to a brick wall. But, brick walls may be able to reason unlike you. Fools don’t admit when they’re proven wrong so you would be the fool here.
