Two groups of people

[qazplm]

Group A: Gets no vetting other than being bounced off a list as they enter this country, can return multiple times, and particularly if they have the right citizenship can get in rather easily.

Group B: Gets 1-2 years of vetting, is strictly limited as to how they can enter this country, and citizenship doesn't matter as to how easy they can get in to this country.

Which Group should we completely bar coming in if we only have to pick one? If we think Group B is too risky to let a single one in without even more vetting, why would we let anyone from Group A in at all?

 

[ecouch]

Logical fallacies are as cute as idealogues.

You tried.

 

[qazplm]

Logical fallacies are as cute as idealogues.

You tried.

Are you saying my question is a logical fallacy, do tell why.

What's the logical fallacy?

Why is illogical to question why you'd let in tourist who aren't vetted at all, vice refugees who are vetted for 1-2 years?
Particularly when most if not all of the Paris attackers were European citizens (you know, the kind that can come here on a tourist VISA) and not refugees?

 

[32zone]

Two groups of people? OK I'll play - those that have lives and only occasionally visit this obscure site and then there's those whose life revolves around this board and check this site every minute of the day and completely monopolize every thread.

 

[qazplm]

Two groups of people? OK I'll play - those that have lives and only occasionally visit this obscure site and then there's those whose life revolves around this board and check this site every minute of the day and completely monopolize every thread.

lol so two total messages? I'm sure you are a brand new guy who's never posted here before. Positive of it.