ADVERTISEMENT

Trump Again with Zero Respect for the Rule of Law

I'm not alleging. His admin violated the court order to stop the planes. I don't know how many more there are, if any. Stay tuned.

Are you saying the number is the primary concern? We're 60 days into the admin and it's already happening.

And BTW, the Alien Enemies Act is not applicable to deporting gang members.

PORUS is given a wide berth when it comes to immigration, as we have seen many times. Follow the damn rules and get these criminals out. Not following the law keeps them here longer than if he would just do it right.
Since the planes were in the air, it remains to be seen just how far a mere district court judge's ruling can be extended in a case like this.

60 days into the second term, but how many court rulings did he "violate" in the first?
 
Do you or one of your bunkmates have a list?
My “bunk mates?”

You’ve made it clear that you’re an old, cranky, anti-democracy guy with mental health issues, but peeping Tom stuff will get you arrested.

I worry that you aren’t getting the mental health services you need—hope Trump didn’t shut down your care options.
 
I'm not alleging. His admin violated the court order to stop the planes. I don't know how many more there are, if any. Stay tuned.

Are you saying the number is the primary concern? We're 60 days into the admin and it's already happening.

And BTW, the Alien Enemies Act is not applicable to deporting gang members.

PORUS is given a wide berth when it comes to immigration, as we have seen many times. Follow the damn rules and get these criminals out. Not following the law keeps them here longer than if he would just do it right.
Were these fine people documented or undocumented immigrants?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bonefish1
The President of the United States just posted this on social media:

“This Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge, a troublemaker and agitator who was sadly appointed by Barack Hussein Obama, was not elected President – He didn’t WIN the popular VOTE (by a lot!), he didn’t WIN ALL SEVEN SWING STATES, he didn’t WIN 2,750 to 525 Counties, HE DIDN’T WIN ANYTHING!”

“This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges’ I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!! WE DON’T WANT VICIOUS, VIOLENT, AND DEMENTED CRIMINALS, MANY OF THEM DERANGED MURDERERS, IN OUR COUNTRY. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!”
What respect can a convicted felon have for the rule if law?
 
Were these fine people documented or undocumented immigrants?
Wtf is wrong with you? Have you read the thread? We're talking about the gang members. They're not fine people, your rapier like wit aside. They need to go.
You understand that there are all sorts of laws regarding immigrants, legal and illegal. The laws include how they are to be evaluated for deportation and a process for doing so.

You just want to focus on how they are bad people... and that should some how make it OK to do whatever you want with them.

It's NOT ABOUT THEM. It's about following the law so innocent people don't get swept up too. It's about checks on an executive branch that seems to actually try to break the rules intentionally. The only other option is they're really freakin stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Katscratch
Wtf is wrong with you? Have you read the thread? We're talking about the gang members. They're not fine people, your rapier like wit aside. They need to go.
You understand that there are all sorts of laws regarding immigrants, legal and illegal. The laws include how they are to be evaluated for deportation and a process for doing so.

You just want to focus on how they are bad people... and that should some how make it OK to do whatever you want with them.

It's NOT ABOUT THEM. It's about following the law so innocent people don't get swept up too. It's about checks on an executive branch that seems to actually try to break the rules intentionally. The only other option is they're really freakin stupid.
Ok fine if they need to go we agree. If a couple got mixed up and were undocumented then why is anyone having heartburn over it? It’s up to the country they were sent to and they can sort it out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bonefish1
My “bunk mates?”

You’ve made it clear that you’re an old, cranky, anti-democracy guy with mental health issues, but peeping Tom stuff will get you arrested.

I worry that you aren’t getting the mental health services you need—hope Trump didn’t shut down your care options.
In other words, you are lying yet again on this forum - this time about the '67' times Trump violated court rulings in his first term.
 
In other words, you are lying yet again on this forum - this time about the '67' times Trump violated court rulings in his first term.
.

That post by you is incredibly dense.

"67" was clearly a joke, but your conspiratorial brain apparently took it very, very seriously.

I worry that you are not getting the mental health assistance you need. If you would like mental health referrals, private message me and I can provide to you.

#PrayersForRiveting

.
 
Wtf is wrong with you? Have you read the thread? We're talking about the gang members. They're not fine people, your rapier like wit aside. They need to go.
You understand that there are all sorts of laws regarding immigrants, legal and illegal. The laws include how they are to be evaluated for deportation and a process for doing so.

You just want to focus on how they are bad people... and that should some how make it OK to do whatever you want with them.

It's NOT ABOUT THEM. It's about following the law so innocent people don't get swept up too. It's about checks on an executive branch that seems to actually try to break the rules intentionally. The only other option is they're really freakin stupid.
Chicken or the egg?

If they come here illegally, breaking our immigration laws, you're saying now they should be afforded the protection of the laws of the country that they entered illegally?
 
  • Love
Reactions: BoilerHuff3
Chicken or the egg?

If they come here illegally, breaking our immigration laws, you're saying now they should be afforded the protection of the laws of the country that they entered illegally?
That's what the court process is for; to determine whether/that they came into the country illegally.

Makes sense to me that we should have deportation laws and procedures, and that those should be followed.
 
Last edited:
Chicken or the egg?

If they come here illegally, breaking our immigration laws, you're saying now they should be afforded the protection of the laws of the country that they entered illegally?
If that's the way the laws are written. I'm not a immigration lawyer.........and I don't think anyone is arguing they should stay. Yeah, follow the law. Or change it.

Do it RIGHT. This "bull in the China shop" approach to everything is stupid and unnecessary.........but it is how trump has done his business his entire life. It appears that INNOCENT people are getting swept up. Yeah, mistakes are gonna happen and it's understandable and tolerable if the rules are being followed. But they aren't.

People with asylum court dates are being swept up and dumped in Salvadoran prisons. Some arrests are based only on tattoos the trump admin says are gang tattoos. No chance to see a lawyer. No other proof.

Is it ok with you that innocent people are being detained and even deported to prison in a foreign country? We're supposed to be the country of law and order and innocent until proven guilty.
 
.

That post by you is incredibly dense.

"67" was clearly a joke, but your conspiratorial brain apparently took it very, very seriously.

I worry that you are not getting the mental health assistance you need. If you would like mental health referrals, private message me and I can provide to you.

#PrayersForRiveting

.
Since you are a proven liar on this forum, your 'jokes' are not clear to anyone but your bunkmates and would-be lib bunkmates.
 
Since you are a proven liar on this forum, your 'jokes' are not clear to anyone but your bunkmates and would-be lib bunkmates.
A proven liar because you say so? I am not a liar. I am not a proven liar.

It's very simple; you just don't like or agree with what I post, and you lash out with personal insults and conspiracy theories.

And it's not just at me. You do the exact same thing to everyone that you disagree with. Occasionally someone you disagree with posts something that you seem to think has been disproven by your opinions or conspiracy theories, or an article which you think supports them. Or they are just plain mistaken or joking. And then you cry "liar!"

That it is mindset that you apply to everyone that doesn't agree with you, and that's a you problem.

My advice to you, which many have given you before but you seem to have no interest in taking:
  1. Grow the hell up.
  2. Establish some credibility by conceding points when someone with whom you disagree makes a valid one.
  3. Occasionally use kindness when others are treating you with respect.
  4. Stop constantly, constantly lobbing insults.
I doubt you'll consider any of these suggestions, but it would be excellent if you did.
 
A proven liar because you say so? I am not a liar. I am not a proven liar.
You on Kash Patel: "Unfortunately that guy has quite literally never worked one single day in law enforcement, never mind federal law enforcement."

You also made up that Ashley Biden claimed her diary had been "forged" (you know, the one in which she wrote she took showers with your hero when she was a kid. )
 
You on Kash Patel: "Unfortunately that guy has quite literally never worked one single day in law enforcement, never mind federal law enforcement."

You also made up that Ashley Biden claimed her diary had been "forged" (you know, the one in which she wrote she took showers with your hero when she was a kid. )
You just can’t, don’t want to, or refuse to get it.

You’ve cited a total of two instances in years that you think apply. One where I quoted an article that said the diary was forged.
On one occasion, did I quote an article that turned out to be inaccurate? On a message board?!!? Oh, the horror!

Cash Patel had a stent as a back bench DOJ headquarters attorney reviewing national security applications. Not exactly, on the street. Not exactly FBI agent working high-level criminal matters. Definitely not a title 18, an arrest authority, law-enforcement officer. So that’s spot on accurate, unless you have some police handbook that lists national security attorney as “law-enforcement”.

You just can’t respond without insults or pushing back on people that at times wouldn’t even be pushing back at you! It’s always gotta be some personal upfront in your eyes, followed by a personal insult.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT