ADVERTISEMENT

Trump Again with Zero Respect for the Rule of Law

K

Katscratch

Redshirt Freshman
Oct 9, 2022
1,417
488
83
The President of the United States just posted this on social media:

“This Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge, a troublemaker and agitator who was sadly appointed by Barack Hussein Obama, was not elected President – He didn’t WIN the popular VOTE (by a lot!), he didn’t WIN ALL SEVEN SWING STATES, he didn’t WIN 2,750 to 525 Counties, HE DIDN’T WIN ANYTHING!”

“This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges’ I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!! WE DON’T WANT VICIOUS, VIOLENT, AND DEMENTED CRIMINALS, MANY OF THEM DERANGED MURDERERS, IN OUR COUNTRY. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!”
 
Zero respect for the rule of law?

He is working to remove criminals from the US or else put them in prison, to locate and save trafficked immigrant children, and to seal the southern border.

Those actions prove immense respect for the rule of law, KatCS. Your statement, in contrast, shows you have no understanding of the "rule of law."
 
  • Like
Reactions: bonefish1, Quix0te, SKYDOG and 1 other person
Riveting- said:
Zero respect for the rule of law?

He is working to remove criminals from the US or else put them in prison, to locate and save trafficked immigrant children, and to seal the southern border.

Those actions prove immense respect for the rule of law, KatCS. Your statement, in contrast, shows you have no understanding of the "rule of law."
Click to expand...
Well both can be true. But following the rule of law is normal and expected. Not doing it will get the attention, as it should.

Actions following the rule doesn't show "immense respect" when you turn around and don't.

He follows it when it's good for him and doesn't when it's bad for him. Can you really deny that? It just shows he's a flaming narcissist. He's praised judges many times........when they rule for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Katscratch
Not to mention, Musk's company just completed the rescue of the astronauts, but apparently they will have to be sent back up.

babylonbee.com

Federal Judge Orders Astronauts Be Returned To Space Station

U.S. — A district judge has issued a ruling saying Trump lacked the Constitutional authority to pick up two astronauts who have been stranded at the International Space Station for several months.
babylonbee.com babylonbee.com
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: bonefish1, Poprudy and tjreese
Riveting- said:
Where did Roberts say Trump has zero respect for the rule of law?
Click to expand...
It has been my experience that people tend to protect those in the same fraternity...whether doctors, coaches, teachers and attorneys "unless" you have a really good relationship for an honest disclosure. I can only recall twice when someone called out another in teh same fraternity and both were from Knight. The first was concerning Lou Henson and the second was Dale Brown
 
Riveting- said:
Not to mention, Musk's company just completed the rescue of the astronauts, but apparently they will have to be sent back up.

babylonbee.com

Federal Judge Orders Astronauts Be Returned To Space Station

U.S. — A district judge has issued a ruling saying Trump lacked the Constitutional authority to pick up two astronauts who have been stranded at the International Space Station for several months.
babylonbee.com babylonbee.com
Click to expand...
I love the Bee, but in this age there is hesitation whether sarcasm or reality...THAT is how bad things have been. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG and Riveting-
  • Angry
Reactions: mediaexpert, SKYDOG and tjreese
Riveting- said:
Here is the reality of the Dem establishment that bni, katcs and Bob blindly support:

www.dailywire.com

Grassley Probes Contractors Who Made Billions On Disastrous ‘Unaccompanied Alien Children’ Program

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), the Senate’s most experienced and tenacious investigator, finally has the attention of the corporations that took more than $9 billion from taxpayers to house illegal immigrant children in the U.S.
www.dailywire.com www.dailywire.com
Click to expand...
@BNIBoiler , @BB62, @Katscratch
 
The very much conservative National Review weighs in:


“It sometimes seems that Donald Trump and his most bitter antagonists live in a parallel universe of Trumplaw. In that mode, judges and lawyers abandon legal sobriety and bend the law beyond its recognizable contours in order to thwart Trump. In response, the president and his circle act intemperately by lobbing personal attacks at judges and lawyers, playing fast and loose with facts and the law, and at least flirting with outright defying the rulings of courts. Whenever this happens, we find ourselves returning to first principles — including the importance of getting the details right. Neither bad faith nor bad habits on the part of either side relieves us of the duty to stand for the Constitution, the rule of law, and the proper separation of powers. We shall need all of these long after Trump is gone.”

"America is ruled by laws that are written down. That is how the people make the rules. In order for rules to be binding, someone must decide what they mean. That is what the Framers of the Constitution meant by “the judicial power,” which they vested in the courts. Voters hire the executive to carry out the rules, in the course of which the president must form views of what the laws mean, but longstanding American constitutional tradition has treated the word of the courts on the meaning of laws as final. Written rules are no less binding on judges; indeed, courts lack legitimate powers outside of them. Where the mandates of law leave room for judgment and discretion, that is typically a job for executive rather than judicial power, and for democratic accountability rather than cloistered and insulated life tenure."

"For more than two centuries, presidents have chafed at the assertions of the supremacy of the judicial branch, and constitutionalists have raised alarms when the imperial judiciary at times has usurped authorities it was not granted by written law. Yet we have never had a full, open rupture between a president and the courts. We should avoid one so long as possible. Progressive Democrats threatened to defy court orders after Roe v. Wade was struck down; once the principle is established in the public mind that such things can be done, it will be a hard principle to limit."
 
Katscratch said:
The very much conservative National Review weighs in:

Click to expand...
Is this what your hero meant last year when he said, per the WSJ:

Speaking in Culver City, Calif., on Wednesday, Mr. Biden said his original plan to “provide millions of working families with debt relief for their college student debt” was derailed by “MAGA Republicans” and “special interests” who challenged the plan in court. “The Supreme Court blocked it,” Mr. Biden added, “but that didn’t stop me.”
 
Riveting- said:
Is this what your hero meant last year when he said, per the WSJ:

Speaking in Culver City, Calif., on Wednesday, Mr. Biden said his original plan to “provide millions of working families with debt relief for their college student debt” was derailed by “MAGA Republicans” and “special interests” who challenged the plan in court. “The Supreme Court blocked it,” Mr. Biden added, “but that didn’t stop me.”
Click to expand...
You’ve run into your diverting addiction again.

The thread topic is:

Trump Again with Zero Respect for the Rule of Law​


Please stay on topic and also refrain from personal attacks.
 
Katscratch said:
You’ve run into your diverting addiction again.

The thread topic is:

Trump Again with Zero Respect for the Rule of Law​


Please stay on topic and also refrain from personal attacks.
Click to expand...
Pointing out your frequent hypocrisy is on target - unless in this case you can bump a post from last year showing your 'outrage' at your hero's boast of not letting the Supreme Court stop him.

Let me know when Trump refuses to follow a Supreme Court ruling like your hero did.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SKYDOG and BoilerHuff3
Riveting- said:
Pointing out your frequent hypocrisy is on target - unless in this case you can bump a post from last year showing your 'outrage' at your hero's boast of not letting the Supreme Court stop him.

Let me know when Trump refuses to follow a Supreme Court ruling like your hero did.
Click to expand...
But he didn't. The Supreme Court didn't say Biden couldn't cancel student loans. It said it couldn't do it the way they did it based on the Heroes act. He had two other attempts fail with the courts..........WITHOUT saying the judges should be impeached.

He used existing programs to cancel some debt. But the scope was below what he tried to do...........by EXECUTIVE ORDER no less.

Too much red news.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Katscratch
BB62 said:
But he didn't. The Supreme Court didn't say Biden couldn't cancel student loans. It said it couldn't do it the way they did it based on the Heroes act. He had two other attempts fail with the courts..........WITHOUT saying the judges should be impeached.

He used existing programs to cancel some debt. But the scope was below what he tried to do...........by EXECUTIVE ORDER no less.

Too much red news.
Click to expand...
Keep on defending the Democrats. Never let the good fight for a great cause get you down no matter how bad it affects the people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bonefish1
SKYDOG said:
Keep on defending the Democrats. Never let the good fight for a great cause get you down no matter how bad it affects the people.
Click to expand...
So no argument about the facts?

I've said over and over here that I oppose student loan forgiveness......of any kind.

You've arrived at the point in your limited political understanding where your party and trump come before the facts. Dems are evil. Take trumps side without thinking. That's about all you got.
 
BB62 said:
So no argument about the facts?

I've said over and over here that I oppose student loan forgiveness......of any kind.

You've arrived at the point in your limited political understanding where your party and trump come before the facts. Dems are evil. Take trumps side without thinking. That's about all you got.
Click to expand...
I absolutely agree, dems are evil. They are no longer the party I used to support.
 
Katscratch said:
The President of the United States just posted this on social media:

“This Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge, a troublemaker and agitator who was sadly appointed by Barack Hussein Obama, was not elected President – He didn’t WIN the popular VOTE (by a lot!), he didn’t WIN ALL SEVEN SWING STATES, he didn’t WIN 2,750 to 525 Counties, HE DIDN’T WIN ANYTHING!”

“This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges’ I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!! WE DON’T WANT VICIOUS, VIOLENT, AND DEMENTED CRIMINALS, MANY OF THEM DERANGED MURDERERS, IN OUR COUNTRY. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!”
Click to expand...
MAGA!
 
BB62 said:
Well both can be true. But following the rule of law is normal and expected. Not doing it will get the attention, as it should.

Actions following the rule doesn't show "immense respect" when you turn around and don't.

He follows it when it's good for him and doesn't when it's bad for him. Can you really deny that? It just shows he's a flaming narcissist. He's praised judges many times........when they rule for him.
Click to expand...
Why do you lefty libs want illegal aliens, who broke our laws, to remain in the US without penalty or consequence? Deport their asses!
 
BB62 said:
So no argument about the facts?

I've said over and over here that I oppose student loan forgiveness......of any kind.

You've arrived at the point in your limited political understanding where your party and trump come before the facts. Dems are evil. Take trumps side without thinking. That's about all you got.
Click to expand...
Do you oppose the deportation of illegal alien criminals?
 
bonefish1 said:
Why do you lefty libs want illegal aliens, who broke our laws, to remain in the US without penalty or consequence? Deport their asses!
Click to expand...
I don't. I want them out too.

Why don't you deal with the real issue? Or can't you understand?

Just follow the law. Why is that so hard?

They're going to get removed. Just follow the rules.
 
bonefish1 said:
Do you oppose the deportation of illegal alien criminals?
Click to expand...
No. Follow the rules. The law. Respect the courts. They aren't going to allow them to stay. Nobody wants them to stay. You can misrepresent what's going on all you want, just like trump and the rest of his minions in the admin and congress........claiming these actions mean the judge wants the criminals and gang members to stay. That anybody who supports the rule of law secretly wants them to stay. It's all BS.
 
BB62 said:
No. Follow the rules. The law. Respect the courts. They aren't going to allow them to stay. Nobody wants them to stay. You can misrepresent what's going on all you want, just like trump and the rest of his minions in the admin and congress........claiming these actions mean the judge wants the criminals and gang members to stay. That anybody who supports the rule of law secretly wants them to stay. It's all BS.
Click to expand...
And stop pardoning felons that assaulted law enforcement, committed major crimes for which they pled guilty, and in some instances had yet to serve time!

That goes for Leonard Pelletier, Hunter Biden, and especially 200+ that assaulted law enforcement on J6.
 
BB62 said:
No. Follow the rules. The law. Respect the courts. They aren't going to allow them to stay. Nobody wants them to stay. You can misrepresent what's going on all you want, just like trump and the rest of his minions in the admin and congress........claiming these actions mean the judge wants the criminals and gang members to stay. That anybody who supports the rule of law secretly wants them to stay. It's all BS.
Click to expand...
If they're here illegally, and especially if they're criminals/gang members, why would we not want them deported ASAP? The longer they're here, the more expensive it gets.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

TwinDegrees2

If Biden was/is too old to be re-elected, what about these lovelies?

Replies
2
Views
362
Free Board: General Discussion Forum
SKYDOG
SKYDOG
tjreese

This can't be true or we would have heard about it on CNN, MSNBC, CBS and ABC or other media. Besides,

Replies
27
Views
6K
Free Board: General Discussion Forum
tjreese
tjreese
PA Boilermakers

The Separation - A proposal for a renewed America

Replies
2
Views
1K
Free Board: General Discussion Forum
BoilerJS
BoilerJS
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back