Trump Again with Zero Respect for the Rule of Law

[Katscratch]

The President of the United States just posted this on social media:

“This Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge, a troublemaker and agitator who was sadly appointed by Barack Hussein Obama, was not elected President – He didn’t WIN the popular VOTE (by a lot!), he didn’t WIN ALL SEVEN SWING STATES, he didn’t WIN 2,750 to 525 Counties, HE DIDN’T WIN ANYTHING!”

“This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges’ I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!! WE DON’T WANT VICIOUS, VIOLENT, AND DEMENTED CRIMINALS, MANY OF THEM DERANGED MURDERERS, IN OUR COUNTRY. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!”

 

[Riveting-]

Zero respect for the rule of law?

He is working to remove criminals from the US or else put them in prison, to locate and save trafficked immigrant children, and to seal the southern border.

Those actions prove immense respect for the rule of law, KatCS. Your statement, in contrast, shows you have no understanding of the "rule of law."

 

[Katscratch]

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5200768-john-roberts-trump-judge-impeachment/

Let's look at the opinion of an ultimate legal expert - the Chief Justice of Tthe Supreme Court.

 

[Riveting-]

Let's look at the opinion of an ultimate legal expert - the Chief Justice of Tthe Supreme Court.

Where did Roberts say Trump has zero respect for the rule of law?

 

[BB62]

Zero respect for the rule of law?

He is working to remove criminals from the US or else put them in prison, to locate and save trafficked immigrant children, and to seal the southern border.

Those actions prove immense respect for the rule of law, KatCS. Your statement, in contrast, shows you have no understanding of the "rule of law."

Well both can be true. But following the rule of law is normal and expected. Not doing it will get the attention, as it should.

Actions following the rule doesn't show "immense respect" when you turn around and don't.

He follows it when it's good for him and doesn't when it's bad for him. Can you really deny that? It just shows he's a flaming narcissist. He's praised judges many times........when they rule for him.

 

[Riveting-]

He follows it when it's good for him and doesn't when it's bad for him.

What are some examples in which Trump did not follow the rule of law?

 

[Katscratch]

What are some examples in which Trump did not follow the rule of law?

oooh oooh... I've got a banger of a first example:

Fake electors.

 

[Riveting-]

oooh oooh... I've got a banger of a first example:

Fake electors.

First indicate where Roberts said Trump has zero respect for the rule of law.

 

[Katscratch]

Judge says dismantling of USAID was unconstitutional, orders Musk to restore access for employees

Elon Musk's attempt to dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development likely violated the United States Constitution, a federal judge ruled on Tuesday.

abcnews.go.com

 

[Riveting-]

Not to mention, Musk's company just completed the rescue of the astronauts, but apparently they will have to be sent back up.

Federal Judge Orders Astronauts Be Returned To Space Station

U.S. — A district judge has issued a ruling saying Trump lacked the Constitutional authority to pick up two astronauts who have been stranded at the International Space Station for several months.

babylonbee.com

 

[tjreese]

Where did Roberts say Trump has zero respect for the rule of law?

It has been my experience that people tend to protect those in the same fraternity...whether doctors, coaches, teachers and attorneys "unless" you have a really good relationship for an honest disclosure. I can only recall twice when someone called out another in teh same fraternity and both were from Knight. The first was concerning Lou Henson and the second was Dale Brown

 

[tjreese]

Not to mention, Musk's company just completed the rescue of the astronauts, but apparently they will have to be sent back up.

Federal Judge Orders Astronauts Be Returned To Space Station

U.S. — A district judge has issued a ruling saying Trump lacked the Constitutional authority to pick up two astronauts who have been stranded at the International Space Station for several months.

babylonbee.com

I love the Bee, but in this age there is hesitation whether sarcasm or reality...THAT is how bad things have been.

 

[Riveting-]

Here is the reality of the Dem establishment that bni, katcs and Bob blindly support:

Grassley Probes Contractors Who Made Billions On Disastrous ‘Unaccompanied Alien Children’ Program

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), the Senate’s most experienced and tenacious investigator, finally has the attention of the corporations that took more than $9 billion from taxpayers to house illegal immigrant children in the U.S.

www.dailywire.com

 

[tjreese]

Here is the reality of the Dem establishment that bni, katcs and Bob blindly support:

Grassley Probes Contractors Who Made Billions On Disastrous ‘Unaccompanied Alien Children’ Program

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), the Senate’s most experienced and tenacious investigator, finally has the attention of the corporations that took more than $9 billion from taxpayers to house illegal immigrant children in the U.S.

www.dailywire.com

Sickening!

 

[Riveting-]

Here is the reality of the Dem establishment that bni, katcs and Bob blindly support:

Grassley Probes Contractors Who Made Billions On Disastrous ‘Unaccompanied Alien Children’ Program

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), the Senate’s most experienced and tenacious investigator, finally has the attention of the corporations that took more than $9 billion from taxpayers to house illegal immigrant children in the U.S.

www.dailywire.com

@BNIBoiler , @BB62, @Katscratch

 

[Katscratch]

The very much conservative National Review weighs in:

https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/03/an-unwelcome-fight-over-obeying-court-orders/

“It sometimes seems that Donald Trump and his most bitter antagonists live in a parallel universe of Trumplaw. In that mode, judges and lawyers abandon legal sobriety and bend the law beyond its recognizable contours in order to thwart Trump. In response, the president and his circle act intemperately by lobbing personal attacks at judges and lawyers, playing fast and loose with facts and the law, and at least flirting with outright defying the rulings of courts. Whenever this happens, we find ourselves returning to first principles — including the importance of getting the details right. Neither bad faith nor bad habits on the part of either side relieves us of the duty to stand for the Constitution, the rule of law, and the proper separation of powers. We shall need all of these long after Trump is gone.”

"America is ruled by laws that are written down. That is how the people make the rules. In order for rules to be binding, someone must decide what they mean. That is what the Framers of the Constitution meant by “the judicial power,” which they vested in the courts. Voters hire the executive to carry out the rules, in the course of which the president must form views of what the laws mean, but longstanding American constitutional tradition has treated the word of the courts on the meaning of laws as final. Written rules are no less binding on judges; indeed, courts lack legitimate powers outside of them. Where the mandates of law leave room for judgment and discretion, that is typically a job for executive rather than judicial power, and for democratic accountability rather than cloistered and insulated life tenure."

"For more than two centuries, presidents have chafed at the assertions of the supremacy of the judicial branch, and constitutionalists have raised alarms when the imperial judiciary at times has usurped authorities it was not granted by written law. Yet we have never had a full, open rupture between a president and the courts. We should avoid one so long as possible. Progressive Democrats threatened to defy court orders after Roe v. Wade was struck down; once the principle is established in the public mind that such things can be done, it will be a hard principle to limit."