Remember, these ne’er do wells got these positions SOLELY on merit.
If a black woman did this in the Biden administration they would have been crying DEI all over the place.
Train Wreck. Clown Show.
- Thread starter Katscratch
- Start date
If a black woman did this in the Biden administration they would have been crying DEI all over the place.
Or a white secretary of state in the Obama administration who, despite her proven stupidity and recklessness in using a private server for all of her SoS emails , would be nominated by your party to run for president - after which you would and your lib soulmates on this forum would be stupid enough to vote for her.
What about the 77 million folks that voted for Chump. A 34 time CONVICTED felon? Who is stupid enough to vote for that?
77 million people who were not dumb enough to vote for a DEI candidate who bragged about her leading role in getting free transgender surgery for convicts.
I’m not talking about Biden, Obama, Bush, Reagan, or Millard Fillmore.
So take your whattaboutisms and shove them up your insurrection supporting, dumb as a stump ass.
This thread is about the COMPLETE CLOWN SHOW of the Trump administration.
Today they were so incredibly stooopid that his senior officials used an over the counter app for the most incredibly sensitive communications imaginable, and then unknowingly invited a private citizen into the information circle.
Mike Waltz should be fired immediately, and Hegseth should never have been considered for his role.
And the clown show continues:
Kash Patel just sent a memo to all ATF employees refuting a CNN report that he is considering hacking down their agency. Complete with “fake news” insults.
Yes, the leader of a major federal agency was triggered enough by a news report that he felt the need to send an all employees memo with insults thrown at that news agency.
I wonder if he’ll start responding to unkind message board posts.
Complete amateur.
Kash Patel just sent a memo to all ATF employees refuting a CNN report that he is considering hacking down their agency. Complete with “fake news” insults.
Yes, the leader of a major federal agency was triggered enough by a news report that he felt the need to send an all employees memo with insults thrown at that news agency.
I wonder if he’ll start responding to unkind message board posts.
Complete amateur.
It’s going to be a long, long, four years.
It will be interesting to see how this unfolds.
If cell phones start getting destroyed and computers start getting bleached than we know there was something to it.
I'm still not convinced the Liberal Atlantic Goldberg character didn't fabricate the story.
The WH has only made a statement that the information released by Goldberg appears authentic.
And this from a Senator who was not involved in the meeting, if the text message meeting occurred.
The information released by The Atlantic was after the attack, so everyone knew the details at that time.
You mean like the Trumpers in Texas who run people off the road cause they don’t like Trump
Ir is a nothingburger. It is a teeny, tiny, momentary security breach that is literally less that one hundredth of one percent compared to the four years of intentional security breaches that Hillary did on her private server as Sec of State. She and the Dems simply joke about it, “Oh my emails.”
Ok Mr expert. What would have happened to you if you had used unsecured communication devices to transmit highly sensitive military operation details?
I would have thought you might be upset. The people most put in harms way by such actions are the personnel in the field.
Lol. Nothingburger. Just watch. This is gross incompetence at the highest levels of our government.
All these people have secure devices to communicate. Why would they use Signal? One reason. It can't be tracked. There would be no record. That's against the rules my friend.
You can't even be objective when you KNOW the severity of this based on your own experience.......and when it puts military personnel at risk. Mr objective.
Oh, no doubt about it. If I had intentionally used an unsecure device to transmit classified information, and had done so repeatedly for years, I would have had my security clearance pulled and been court-marshalled.
A single, unintentional breach by someone new to the game which resulted in no harm, that's a nothingburger. But the far-left news media are make it into Armageddon. And your " . . . military personnel at risk . . ." Kneeslapper!
Live updates: Trump defends Mike Waltz after group text leak as Democrats demand answers
President Trump said his national security adviser "learned a lesson" after he mistakenly opened up a secret chat of Trump officials to a reporter.
www.indystar.com
Last edited:
Someone new to the game? Is Steven Miller new to the game? Do you have to be new to the game to not know to use secure communications? You don't think ALL THESE PEOPLE on the text were briefed on what communications were safe and which weren't? Lol. The SecDef didn't know how to communicate securely?
From what I've read, these types of communications are typically done in a SCIF.
Nice deflection. You think I'm gonna defend what Hillary did? ROFL.
All you freakin idiots with your whataboutisms.
You can't even see the flaw and sheer ignorance of your argument.
You equate this to what Hillary did. You say her actions were grossly negligent and threatened national security. You are ADMITTING this is just as bad or similar, YET YOU MAKE EXCUSES FOR IT AND DENY ITS A SERIOUS ISSUE.
If your going to use a whataboutism, you're conceding the severity of it while at the same time saying it's no big deal.
Are you saying the group want briefed on communications security? Or did they just choose to ignore protocol? Is it hubris or ignorance.........or on purpose so their communications couldn't be tracked?
I did not admit this was just as bad or similar. It wasn't. This was a single, accidental leak compared to thousands of intentional security breaches over four years.
Nobody equated it to what Hillary did, which was intentional and had vastly greater potential consequences.
Can't you even understand that, Bagram?
Far from me to defend Hillary........but "thousands of intentional security breaches" is complete BS. There's no evidence her emails were hacked. There's nome to say the group text was either but Signal can be accessed by professionals in minutes.
You don't to talk about the incompetence of using Signal? I don't know it was a single event, do you? We only know about one. Have they been using signal since 1/20?
Did Kash immediately confiscate the phones? He should have.
Why did trump say he knew nothing about it? Was he lying or is he surrounded by people that don't want to tell him? Or the organization is so screwed up nobody actually told him?
Of course. It was a private server. We have no way of knowing if it was hacked, how often, by whom, when. And be aware that every person that she emailed during those four years was fully aware they were receiving messages from an unsecure, non-government email address and not one of them had the integrity, dignity or balls to report the security breach. Hillary did not once log into her official government email account during her entire tenure as Sec of State. Those State Dept cowards are filth.
What is shocking is that they would follow a 2024 'best practice' from your hero's administration - or any best practice from the Joe Crow administration.
Biden-era guidance encouraged use of Signal app by highly-targeted govt officials: 'Best practice'
A Biden-era Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) best guidance document shows highly-targeted government employees were encouraged to use Signal.
Last edited:
Waiting to see if your shock has subsided, @Katscratch.
What do you think, Bagram ? @BB62 ... @BNIBoiler
What do you think, Bagram ? @BB62 ... @BNIBoiler
Ya think that Fox News may have buried the lead in their own article?What is shocking is that they would follow a 2024 'best practice' from your hero's administration - or any best practice from the Joe Crow administration.
Biden-era guidance encouraged use of Signal app by highly-targeted govt officials: 'Best practice'
A Biden-era Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) best guidance document shows highly-targeted government employees were encouraged to use Signal.www.foxnews.com
From your link:
“A Department of Defense memo from 2023 under the Biden administration detailed that while Signal was approved for some use by government officials, they could not use the platform to "access, transmit, process non-public DoD information." CISA's guidance related to Signal was released after the Department of Defense guidance.”
So Signal? At times, yes. BUT NOT FOR WAR STRIKES, YOU DINGBAT
No mention of DOD in the CISA best practice, which, as you say, came out after the DoD guidance.
"While applicable to all audiences, this guidance specifically addresses “highly targeted” individuals who are in senior government or senior political
positions and likely to possess information of interest to these threat actors."
The real mistake here was that somehow a hack reporter got added to the distribution.
Disagree. If true, by far the biggest f up is Hegseth blatantly lying. Those career high level officers don’t appreciate or trust liars.
DOGE over-exuberance.
Investigation Reveals DOGE Had Just Laid Off The Guy Whose Job It Was To Make Sure Jeffrey Goldberg Wasn’t In The War Group Chat
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Elon Musk was quick to apologize Monday for DOGE mistakenly laying off the one government employee whose job it was to prevent journalist Jeffrey Goldberg from being in war strategy group chats.
babylonbee.com
Lying about the mistakenly shared invite on a non-secure system NOT being about war planes and NOT being classified information.
Cabinet secretaries calling European allies “pathetic freeloaders” with a reporter listening in?
Which of our European "allies" is not a pathetic freeloader? Be specific.
Are you afraid it hurt their feelings?
Those are our closest allies, you idiot.
But then again, you already knew that they are, and we already knew that you are.
Last edited:
That doesn't mean they are not pathetic freeloaders - for which I don't blame them. We let them do it for decades while they financed expansive social welfare programs.
By pathetic, the VP meant they are on the same landmass as Russia, but haven't stepped up to provide their own defense. Like a pathetic free-loading, drug-addicted in-law - the addiction being to US taxpayer-funded defense.
Why were they talking so much about Europe and how they would have to pay us back for reopening the shipping lanes? I know they run more goods through there than we do but it seems like that was a conversation for another time. Trump had said to go. They appeared to be focused on that subject way too much considering the point of the texts.
I wondered that too. I think that since they had to get POTUS final approval to launch the attack, the VP was still hoping to get the group to agree to recommend to delay the attack as he said.
Wow, I'm impressed with your knowledge of high level military officers. How long did you serve?
So you're going to go with the counterpoint of "career high level officers DO appreciate or trust liars?"
Gotcha sparky.
No, I'm going to go with "Where did you gain such insight into high level military officers?"
Similar threads
