Thought provoking article

[Bethboilerfan]

Just read this article: https://www.thedailybeast.com/foxs-...ort-there-is-something-there?via=twitter_page

Not sure what to think as it appears, at least to Judge Napolitano, that there is evidence on collusion of something but not enough for reasonable doubt standard?????? And on the obstruction charge Mueller left it to be decided by Barr.

 

[kescwi]

He says the report is 700 pages, NYT says 300 pages, and this "conclusion" of no collusion by the campaign or any members is based in the summary on what appears to be the last part of one sentence, not even a full sentence, out of lord knows how many in the report on the topic. And even then, as your article points out, that partial sentence doesn't even say there was absolutely no collusion.

This is a joke and it is starting to look like that Trump has gotten what he has wanted, an AG who acts as his personal attorney. Protecting him and, we'll see how far this goes, attacking politically for him.

 

[Bethboilerfan]

Question: Who will be responsible for the redactions on this report????

 

[kescwi]

I have read both Mueller's team and Barr's will do the redacting. I wouldn't expect much on collusion because of ongoing criminal cases and evidence from the grand jury, so probably nothing on Manafort and his giving polling data to a Russian and Stone's dealings with Wikileaks, along with all the others who have been shown to have lied about contact with Russians.

 

[Bethboilerfan]

I saw that in article but not sure what the "rules" will be or what/who will make the final decisions