ADVERTISEMENT

The portal is closed. Rankings now for next season.

…..that was how long ago?

And was that with guys in their first year at IU from mid majors that wanted to played T IU only because they got overpaid?

I forget.
I'm not sure what these dudes are getting paid. I mean if they wanted to overpay, they'd have Conwell and probably some others. I think DeVries is being much more deliberate than Woodson.

Also, Purdue was pretty darned successful in the Big Ten with small ball this past year right? So the two best teams in the conference played a lot of small ball and we're successful? Seems like it can work. I guess we will see what happens.
 
MSU was at their best with their guards. And 5 of their top 6 minutes guys were 6-6 and under. So it can work. Will Indiana win the Big Ten? No probably not. I guess it depends on your definition of "working." Is 10-10 in the Big Ten working? Or is only winning a B1G title? Small Ball can definitely work. Though we will see how small Indiana really is once the roster is filled out. Bailey is 6-10 and Alexis is 6-9.
10-10 is what IU was last year, not sure you’re fan base would accept that again and miss tournament.

It’s crazy that Alexis keeps growing. Listed at 6’8 and now everyone is saying he’s 6’9. Didn’t play much of a role for UF once Handlogten came back from injury. 1 min in all of NCAAT.

Bailey…I guess could be your big? But he will get into foul trouble more than likely.

MSU guards (and coach) are a whole lot different and better than what IU has right now. However, I do enjoy seeing the mental gymnastics IU fans on X and you are saying in hopes IU can be successful. “Well Houston did it” or “Miami did it a few years ago”. And now yours of “well IU did it a decade ago”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indy_Rider
I'm not sure what these dudes are getting paid. I mean if they wanted to overpay, they'd have Conwell and probably some others. I think DeVries is being much more deliberate than Woodson.

Also, Purdue was pretty darned successful in the Big Ten with small ball this past year right? So the two best teams in the conference played a lot of small ball and we're successful? Seems like it can work. I guess we will see what happens.
If IU has two all Americans/two all big ten first teamers, the best PG in the country along with the best PF in the country, all while being the best 3pt shooting team in the conference, then yes, they will be successful.
 
If IU has two all Americans/two all big ten first teamers, the best PG in the country along with the best PF in the country, all while being the best 3pt shooting team in the conference, then yes, they will be successful.
Well they *should* be a good 3pt shooting team. It'll be interesting to see exactly what his direction is. It's a hell of a lot different from Woodsons direction for sure. But he has brought in some dudes who are hopefully hungry and don't seem to be bad shooters.

Nick Dorn 35.1% on 8.4 attempts
Jason Drake 39.6% on 3.1
Jasai Miles 33.5% on 7.3
Lamar Wilkerson 44.5% on 7.7
Reed Bailey 41.5% on 1.2
Tucker DeVries 47.3% on 6.9(was 36.3% on 7.1 in a full season before)
Conor Enright 32.5% on 3.5

The whole team now, even including Alexis and Conerway(and using DeVries last season at Drake since it's more in line with how he will actually shoot at 36% and not 47%), shot 36.1% last season. I think Sisley is a good shooter in high school so will see how that translates. For reference as to how different these guys are than Woody's team last year, IU was 203-632 from 3 last year. These guys were 472-1302(36.1%). That would have been tied for 59th compared to IU this past season shooting 32.1% for 263rd in the nation.

From the looks of it, seems he's going for the old saying "live by the 3, die by the 3." We will see if it works🤷
 
10-10 is what IU was last year, not sure you’re fan base would accept that again and miss tournament.

It’s crazy that Alexis keeps growing. Listed at 6’8 and now everyone is saying he’s 6’9. Didn’t play much of a role for UF once Handlogten came back from injury. 1 min in all of NCAAT.

Bailey…I guess could be your big? But he will get into foul trouble more than likely.

MSU guards (and coach) are a whole lot different and better than what IU has right now. However, I do enjoy seeing the mental gymnastics IU fans on X and you are saying in hopes IU can be successful. “Well Houston did it” or “Miami did it a few years ago”. And now yours of “well IU did it a decade ago”.
Indiana has been 10-10 the past two seasons. But if people see a product that looks like it can work, sees progress, sees hard play and hustle etc, people will be okay with it. You'll have a loud fringe that acts like morons. 10-10 in the B1G puts you on the bubble.
 
ANd that's completely fine. I'd put Purdue on the 1 line. No clue about Indiana yet. Roster isn't done. Really good pieces. Considering DeVries track record and everyone stays healthy, should be a 20 win season and that puts a good chance at making the tourney. And I'll take that in year 1.
15 wins. 17 max. That isn't a tourney pick. IU's not the only team changing it's line up
 
Well they *should* be a good 3pt shooting team. It'll be interesting to see exactly what his direction is. It's a hell of a lot different from Woodsons direction for sure. But he has brought in some dudes who are hopefully hungry and don't seem to be bad shooters.

Nick Dorn 35.1% on 8.4 attempts
Jason Drake 39.6% on 3.1
Jasai Miles 33.5% on 7.3
Lamar Wilkerson 44.5% on 7.7
Reed Bailey 41.5% on 1.2
Tucker DeVries 47.3% on 6.9(was 36.3% on 7.1 in a full season before)
Conor Enright 32.5% on 3.5

The whole team now, even including Alexis and Conerway(and using DeVries last season at Drake since it's more in line with how he will actually shoot at 36% and not 47%), shot 36.1% last season. I think Sisley is a good shooter in high school so will see how that translates. For reference as to how different these guys are than Woody's team last year, IU was 203-632 from 3 last year. These guys were 472-1302(36.1%). That would have been tied for 59th compared to IU this past season shooting 32.1% for 263rd in the nation.

From the looks of it, seems he's going for the old saying "live by the 3, die by the 3." We will see if it works🤷
"Slight" difference now that the boys are in the B10. Whole lot better defense on the 3's.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indy_Rider
Same teams, different order. No one knows anything. That’s why they play and we watch.
 
It appears that DeVries has a plan and is building his roster accordingly, but unless he can land a few more quality bigs, front court depth may be a big problem.
They were looking at Scott from Louisville. 6-11 guy. Doesn't have crazy numbers or anything but I don't think DeVries is looking for a big man to throw down in the post to outside of Bailey. And he's gotten some guys who have more than 1 year left which is nice.
 
Umm...I was referring to the sucess I believe Devries will have at IU. As I've stated before, IU had to settle to get a coach to come.
"Settle." Guess it depends on what you believe settling is and what conspiracy you believe in. Guess we will see what kind of success he can have. He can clearly coach given his track record.
 
I'm not sure what these dudes are getting paid. I mean if they wanted to overpay, they'd have Conwell and probably some others. I think DeVries is being much more deliberate than Woodson.

Also, Purdue was pretty darned successful in the Big Ten with small ball this past year right? So the two best teams in the conference played a lot of small ball and we're successful? Seems like it can work. I guess we will see what happens.
Purdue was successful? Maybe in IU's eyes. Now we come from bragging about our NIL money and 5* star athletes to DeVries being more deliberate than Woodson. So where in the world is IU bar set to now. Chase away your 5* and load up with injured 3 and 4 stars some who barely played last year. The thing I see is DeVries, is being more Painter like and less like the IU FAN and X-coach mentality. Exit Hollywood enter (I apologize to Nebraska fans) Nebraska ball footprint. Talent wise it is still mid pack, little height, short bench, and DeVries is still a work in progress.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indy_Rider
"Settle." Guess it depends on what you believe settling is and what conspiracy you believe in. Guess we will see what kind of success he can have. He can clearly coach given his track record.
100% speculation. new world, bigger stage, BIG has great coaches. Izzo, Painter & May are very impressive. His biggest probably is the ENTITLED fan base that eats their own year after year!
 
I have no problem if an IU fan wants to post here but why isn’t he posting on his own board? I’ve never heard of a Purdue fan only posting on an IU board and not their own. Seems a bit bizarre. IU fan kicked off their own board?
 
I have no problem if an IU fan wants to post here but why isn’t he posting on his own board? I’ve never heard of a Purdue fan only posting on an IU board and not their own. Seems a bit bizarre. IU fan kicked off their own board?
I've never actually been to the IU site here. But I go to a different site for IU sports. A better one.
 
Purdue was successful? Maybe in IU's eyes. Now we come from bragging about our NIL money and 5* star athletes to DeVries being more deliberate than Woodson. So where in the world is IU bar set to now. Chase away your 5* and load up with injured 3 and 4 stars some who barely played last year. The thing I see is DeVries, is being more Painter like and less like the IU FAN and X-coach mentality. Exit Hollywood enter (I apologize to Nebraska fans) Nebraska ball footprint. Talent wise it is still mid pack, little height, short bench, and DeVries is still a work in progress.
Yes, Purdue was successful this past season. I'm not sure by whose standards they weren't. They kept right with the expectations to begin the season with. People had them as a max S16 team, started 14th in the AP... Finished in the S16 and 14th in the final AP. Finished tied 4th in the B1G. After losing the 2x NPOY and some veterans. Yea, that's a successful year.
 
Yes, Purdue was successful this past season. I'm not sure by whose standards they weren't. They kept right with the expectations to begin the season with. People had them as a max S16 team, started 14th in the AP... Finished in the S16 and 14th in the final AP. Finished tied 4th in the B1G. After losing the 2x NPOY and some veterans. Yea, that's a
"People had them max S16 team". Is that you and your little iu buddies? Why not minimum S16? That's right, you make things up...constantly.
 
I put on ignore - it’s fantastic. Here’s the thing that is really hilarious - Purdue is going into the new year pre season number 1, will be a favorite to win it all, and IU is completely irrelevant and has been for years. Nobody here cares who they signed and what their fan base thinks. IU is really a story of a program living in the past and Purdue is a program of the present and future. One program has been far superior to the other for years now and it’s not even debatable. Go find an IU site and talk about the nuances of a mediocre program!
 
Last edited:
Ohh sorry. It was actually a Purdue fan that started it 🤷
It's a PU board. It was PU posters talking about different things. One of the things discussed was IU. Nobody "started" anything. You saw IU mentioned and just had to jump in. Rinse and repeat.
 
I put on ignore - it’s fantastic. Here’s the thing that is really hilarious - Purdue is going into the new year pre season number 1, will be a favorite to win it all, and IU is completely irrelevant and has been for years. Nobody here cares who they signed and what their fan base thinks. IU is really a story of a program living in the past and Purdue is a program of the present and future. One program has been far superior to the other for years now and it’s not even debatable. Go find an IU site and talk about the nuances of a mediocre program!
Just did, great suggestion. I only have two on ignore now, Wole is the other. Two posters that constantly make up content that is just wrong, and also try to move threads toward their myopic agendas. Will be easier to scroll now.
 
Purdue was successful? Maybe in IU's eyes. Now we come from bragging about our NIL money and 5* star athletes to DeVries being more deliberate than Woodson. So where in the world is IU bar set to now. Chase away your 5* and load up with injured 3 and 4 stars some who barely played last year. The thing I see is DeVries, is being more Painter like and less like the IU FAN and X-coach mentality. Exit Hollywood enter (I apologize to Nebraska fans) Nebraska ball footprint. Talent wise it is still mid pack, little height, short bench, and DeVries is still a work in progress.
Here''s my question...With Iowa needng a coach, and Devries whoring himself for the money...why didn't Iowa hire their own farm boy Devries?
 
It's a PU board. It was PU posters talking about different things. One of the things discussed was IU. Nobody "started" anything. You saw IU mentioned and just had to jump in. Rinse and repeat.
Maybe you should read back lol. It might be a PU board. But it's an open college basketball thread. And IU and the new coach was brought up in a direct reply to me.
 
Here''s my question...With Iowa needng a coach, and Devries whoring himself for the money...why didn't Iowa hire their own farm boy Devries?
I'm assuming resources. I am sure he would have went to Iowa had they had the same resources as Indiana. It's gonna be wild for Iowa fans though. To go from Fran to McCollum is such a 180.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT