I am sure that Patrick Mahomes could assist and/or his friends to help out, if needed,Where are they getting all this money?
i saw where they have a $200M stadium renovation planned as well.
There has been so much talk on here that colleges could not directly do this. It had to be businesses or boosters. I guess that has been put to rest now. Purdue is going to have to come out with a "Boilermaker Special" for their athletes.One year 25 grand for all scholarship players plus 15 walk ons....Saw it on ESPN but I am on my phone and can't link....
There's oil in them hills.Where are they getting all this money?
i saw where they have a $200M stadium renovation planned as well.
PutinWhere are they getting all this money?
i saw where they have a $200M stadium renovation planned as well.
It seems so shady to have literally the most despised man in the world fund your football program. I didn’t even know he was a passionate college football fan!Putin
Texas Tech is not directly doing this. It is the boosters that are doing this.There has been so much talk on here that colleges could not directly do this. It had to be businesses or boosters. I guess that has been put to rest now. Purdue is going to have to come out with a "Boilermaker Special" for their athletes.
I’d rather give $50K to our top 50 players.One year 25 grand for all scholarship players plus 15 walk ons....Saw it on ESPN but I am on my phone and can't link....
Theres oil in them there Permian Basin?No hills in Lubbock! 🙂
That's a tough call. People will be slighted and then the next argument will be should it have been the top 60 and on and on.I’d rather give $50K to our top 50 players.
And Texas Tech is an example of a program that is in a better position if NIL kept separate from program budgets per the intent of the law. They can't compete with Big Ten or SEC budgets, but their boosters can step up to level the recruiting field. Go to a Big Ten also-ran and have access to nice facilities and better coaching or go to TTU and get paid.Texas Tech is not directly doing this. It is the boosters that are doing this.
The smart thing about what they are doing is the 15 walkons can probably pay for their cost of attendance with the NIL money, assuming they are instate.That's a tough call. People will be slighted and then the next argument will be should it have been the top 60 and on and on.
The extremely wealthy and powerful value anonymity. They’d rather roll out a guy with a twang that you wanna have a beer with.Perhaps it's time for the Ivy League to re-enter major college football. I'm sure that there's plenty of their alumni if they cared that could buy one of the best teams in the US, and also give favorable legislation to their cause. Get rid of those more modern day upstarts.
The smartest thing in the world is for as outside many dollars as humanely possible to go to NIL. I fully expect for that not to happen and for Purdue to be like “look at all this inside money that we can’t give out in NIL. Sure is a shame we have so much of it.” LolAnd Texas Tech is an example of a program that is in a better position if NIL kept separate from program budgets per the intent of the law. They can't compete with Big Ten or SEC budgets, but their boosters can step up to level the recruiting field. Go to a Big Ten also-ran and have access to nice facilities and better coaching or go to TTU and get paid.
Wasn’t Sasha stephanovich one of If not THE biggest recipient of money last year?That's a tough call. People will be slighted and then the next argument will be should it have been the top 60 and on and on.
And the part nobody is saying out loud, that NIL donations help football programs to circumvent things like Title IX regulations and debt repayment. Most athletic departments operate on state welfare.The smartest thing in the world is for as outside many dollars as humanely possible to go to NIL. I fully expect for that not to happen and for Purdue to be like “look at all this inside money that we can’t give out in NIL. Sure is a shame we have so much of it.” Lol
How do they do that when most of Their fans are the most fiscally conservative people you’ll meet??And the part nobody is saying out loud, that NIL donations help football programs to circumvent things like Title IX regulations and debt repayment. Most athletic departments operate on state welfare.
What would the criteria be to judge that? Would a third string skill player, like a WR, be worth more than a second string OL or DL in judging the top 50, etc, etc.?I’d rather give $50K to our top 50 players.
Yeah probably not good for team morale to only pay half your roster. Also, how would you even objectively decide who those top 50 players are?That's a tough call. People will be slighted and then the next argument will be should it have been the top 60 and on and on.
Objectively you could exclude freshmen. That is the Matt Painter solution and gets the number down to around 60 or so for football.Yeah probably not good for team morale to only pay half your roster. Also, how would you even objectively decide who those top 50 players are?
But freshmen are not objectively worse than older players and the post I responded too specifically mentioned paying the top 50 players.Objectively you could exclude freshmen. That is the Matt Painter solution and gets the number down to around 60 or so for football.
FDB's point is that by excluding Freshmen specifically, you don't have to decide who the top X number of players are. It's called an alternative solution to the problem.But freshmen are not objectively worse than older players and the post I responded too specifically mentioned paying the top 50 players.
Thank you captain obvious.FDB's point is that by excluding Freshmen specifically, you don't have to decide who the top X number of players are. It's called an alternative solution to the problem.
Purdue can't be involved.. NIL is all outside money....So basically it comes down to alumni putting something togetherPurdue just needs to divert funding from supporting scholarships to funding NIL (or at least make it an option for those who want to fund NIL versus pay for scholarships). Then take the TV money to fund scholarships.
Seems to be an easy way to turn TV money into NIL money.
Continue to reward NIL supporters just like JPC donations.
I'd much rather see...pay for performance!!I’d rather give $50K to our top 50 players.
Exactly. That’s how you determine the top 50.I'd much rather see...pay for performance!!
My point was, instead of asking the JPC to support scholarships, provide the same “reward” structure to the NIL group and have the AD pay for scholarships themselves.Purdue can't be involved.. NIL is all outside money....So basically it comes down to alumni putting something together
I'd rather just pay based on the percentage of snaps played on offense and defense. Maybe we could throw in a discretionary sign on bonus.I’d rather give $50K to our top 50 players.
This is like Texas offering O-Linemen $50K for coming to UT. Isn't that just buying players? Let the bidding wars begin, since it's all in the open now...One year 25 grand for all scholarship players plus 15 walk ons....Saw it on ESPN but I am on my phone and can't link....
Aka The Jack Perdue Club.My point was, instead of asking the JPC to support scholarships, provide the same “reward” structure to the NIL group and have the AD pay for scholarships themselves.
under that scenario, no money goes to NIL from the university. It just diverts alumni money from supporting scholarships to alumni money supporting NIL.
That's really a smart move. Paying 15 walkons allows you to expand your roster by 15 players/yr, with quality players, who give you good depth. The old 85 man roster limit just got bypassed, since you could end up with 60 walkons, who were capable of playing. A great way to horde players and keep them away from your competition. The guys, who have no shot at playing will hit the portal and TT may find a few solid players among the walkons.The smart thing about what they are doing is the 15 walkons can probably pay for their cost of attendance with the NIL money, assuming they are instate.